GNU bug report logs - #53749
29.0.50; [PATCH] Xref backend for TeX buffers

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: David Fussner <dfussner <at> googlemail.com>

Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 15:10:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 29.0.50

Fixed in version 31.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #340 received at 53749 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com>
To: David Fussner <dfussner <at> googlemail.com>
Cc: 53749 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp>,
 Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>, Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>,
 Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>, Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>,
 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: bug#53749: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Xref backend for TeX buffers
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:35:00 +0200
16 sep. 2024 kl. 10.33 skrev David Fussner <dfussner <at> googlemail.com>:

> (re-search-forward "[][\\{}\"*`'#=&()%,|$[:cntrl:][:blank:]]")

Fine as far as I'm concerned.

> (I still, I'm ashamed to confess, find the traditional regexp syntax
> easier to read than rx notation, but could overcome this if you think
> rx is a better fit here.)

There is not a big difference in this case so stick to what you prefer.

Otherwise, I encourage you to try using rx from time to time – it's habit-forming!





This bug report was last modified 243 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.