GNU bug report logs - #53749
29.0.50; [PATCH] Xref backend for TeX buffers

Previous Next

Full log

Message #179 received at 53749 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: David Fussner <dfussner <at> googlemail.com>
Cc: 53749 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp>,
 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>,
 Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
 stefankangas <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#53749: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Xref backend for TeX buffers
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:04:39 +0200

David Fussner <dfussner <at> googlemail.com> writes:

> Thanks for the nudge. I am in fact in the final stages of preparing a
> new patch to get xref working in TeX buffers.

Thanks for the update.

> The semantic/symref backend used by xref-find-references greps in
> files matching the major-mode of the buffer where the user calls the
> command. It looks in semantic-symref-filepattern-alist for
> file-extensions matching the major-mode, and if that fails it looks in
> auto-mode-alist. When both fail to produce any file extensions it
> tells the user to customize semantic-symref-filepattern-alist. Also,
> if it finds things in s-s-f-a, it doesn't go on to auto-mode-alist, so
> s-s-f-a has to be complete in order to be useful. In effect, we need
> s-s-f-a to hold all the extensions for all the modes that can appear
> as values of major-mode, and I notice that AUCTeX has started to
> populate that alist, though incompletely.

I'm not familiar with the way xref works, but reading the above, xref
doesn't care about modes set per file variables, is this correct?

> I'm also aware that many packages add their own extensions to files
> which are basically TeX or LaTeX files, and I wonder whether we can
> really keep up with the whole of CTAN in terms of providing complete
> lists of extensions for s-s-f-a.

I think this is almost impossible.  Besides the effort, take for example
the .cnf extension which is used by other programs as well, so
associating it with LaTeX-mode wouldn't make sense, IMO.  Finally, I
think many packages are written in .dtx format and the ones with many
files with different extensions (.def, .enc, .fd, ...) usually extract
them from the .dtx via an .ins file, so the edited source is inside the
.dtx, and we don't need to care about these extensions.

> As an example of where we are, if you open a plain-tex-mode (or
> plain-TeX-mode) file and M-? with point on some standard word you'll
> currently get the message to customize s-s-f-a, because
> auto-mode-alist has only tex-mode and s-s-f-a doesn't cover them,
> either.

This is possibly the next mess since .tex can be plain-TeX, ConTeXt,
LaTeX ...  So in general, I second what Stefan M. wrote in his other
message, but respecting/using file local variables could help here (if
it doesn't work ATM, see above), e.g.:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\beginsection 1. Introduction.
This is the start of the introduction.
\bye

%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: plain-TeX
%%% TeX-master: t
%%% End:
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

HTH.  Best, Arash

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.