From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 13 05:29:04 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2010 10:29:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NV0TH-0006Tt-SV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:29:04 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NV0TF-0006TW-Nz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:29:02 -0500 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:36360) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NV0TD-0002rp-5p for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:28:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NV0TA-00068y-Jn for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:28:58 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on monty-python X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from mail-fx0-f228.google.com ([209.85.220.228]:48659) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NV0T9-000680-Li for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:28:55 -0500 Received: by fxm28 with SMTP id 28so14806980fxm.26 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:28:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=NUOFeccD1ufeneJTVgLd9bMMxCxMr5MzpqaNxuL98AA=; b=kLYsPvaKwOIdHBICbEYIaVnGED6SibfZN0TgW8hvAF9V1a+6Ri81lBHmFJY6YxQHLX Y9Muvah4Hv2RXz9mATUU+w/E71sZBh8pKvDu2my5bIWqApQTFBnUOOFn1CktwY+7hd1s JjGCjpf7eVYOD3O87E995r+WmY+mLD3ZDMxmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=PhV/jNu33KOBEVBqB2YXz07AUahmtlS9FvxVNXiArsA90Zb86DPFmjNa+fcXIvWiyq GNwxk/wh/7c73Rvw51mHWweXfh2A8UpVxd4dZRME9XJoP4KfS3I+EvoSFS4CmNADwcJG 2Z+viqXs7PHraV2pWbUTkAiBT3tcqc6iDodlg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.183.147 with SMTP id u19mr39209hbg.106.1263378534102; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:28:54 -0800 (PST) From: Lennart Borgman Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:28:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: vc-find-file-hook in batch? To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) Should really vc-find-file-hook be in find-file-hook when Emacs is run in batch? Could not that create problems? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 14 21:34:16 2010 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2010 02:34:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVc0u-0002Nz-7E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:34:16 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVc0s-0002Nt-9H for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:34:14 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVc0o-0003pu-Q3; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:34:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19279.54306.760765.98090@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:34:10 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: red X-Ran: :m~t}wvg-c(~($msYvZ|;v.!JomO'3d}hwb{k1S4tPrXRnrVb!DCq)dD@=s-a^i3cq17iH X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) tags 3642 moreinfo unreproducible severity 3699 minor severity 3870 minor severity 4438 minor severity 4952 minor severity 5154 minor close 5215 severity 5239 wishlist close 5318 severity 5360 wishlist severity 5362 minor tags 4974 moreinfo unreproducible severity 4408 wishlist severity 4089 wishlist tags 4089 wontfix reassign 4044 emacs,ns merge 2280 5252 tags 5374 moreinfo reassign 4828 emacs,cc-mode tags 4828 patch reassign 5001 emacs,erc close 5371 reassign 4517 emacs,ns severity 3230 minor close 4930 close 5249 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 11 20:15:14 2011 Received: (at 5374) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2011 00:15:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQd8-0002Ht-AY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:15:14 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQd7-000288-EA for 5374@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:15:13 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48535) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQd1-0005Ym-Ms; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:15:07 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Lennart Borgman Subject: Re: bug#5374: vc-find-file-hook in batch? References: X-Spook: counter intelligence Marxist assassination Aldergrove X-Ran: ,P\Q`C`^s3VL7^th@k82_:8@_oc6(cS{eo'uV')zx}(W)+gOoKA\Qf+BM`TcT9uj)]XA~d X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:15:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:28:34 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5374 Cc: 5374@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Lennart Borgman wrote: > Should really vc-find-file-hook be in find-file-hook when Emacs is run > in batch? Could not that create problems? Can you give an example of a problem? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 12 07:09:06 2011 Received: (at 5374) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2011 11:09:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgapu-0007ZN-13 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:09:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgaps-0007Yo-W2 for 5374@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:09:05 -0400 Received: by eye13 with SMTP id 13so2040198eye.3 for <5374@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:08:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=X45gYr6HbmR6a3tQnJZZ8RpGcWtOMARDy2Rd6a6tjRg=; b=SYp4XomG8knjdaK/MEGPUbPk6+3y9ntUQcMrxYtZouJmEQ0apRgE5UwLSo0ukf6drQ eMaNc/ITorjaqHEnXdvQlMEZNN/nXoimEvjW1p+IxunNABlRZo/ZV3c95bcszOJAzedS IOVcmfgSdWQ6Hx+57EdZX6mpwCOgARdnvkDdE= Received: by 10.213.27.143 with SMTP id i15mr1898031ebc.38.1310468939110; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:08:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.114.16 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:08:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:08:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5374: vc-find-file-hook in batch? To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5374 Cc: 5374@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:15, Glenn Morris wrote: > Lennart Borgman wrote: > >> Should really vc-find-file-hook be in find-file-hook when Emacs is run >> in batch? Could not that create problems? > > Can you give an example of a problem? In some cases I run a lot of batch jobs from Emacs (to be sure about what is loaded in Emacs). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 12 12:03:56 2011 Received: (at 5374) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2011 16:03:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgfRD-0005UR-JV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:03:55 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.143]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgfRB-0005UF-Tz for 5374@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:03:54 -0400 Received: from furball (dhcp128036014025.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6CG3m6V030809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:03:48 -0400 From: Chong Yidong To: Lennart Borgman Subject: Re: bug#5374: vc-find-file-hook in batch? References: Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:03:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:08:39 +0200") Message-ID: <87hb6rmqor.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.143 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5374 Cc: Glenn Morris , 5374@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Lennart Borgman writes: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:15, Glenn Morris wrote: >> Lennart Borgman wrote: >> >>> Should really vc-find-file-hook be in find-file-hook when Emacs is run >>> in batch? Could not that create problems? >> >> Can you give an example of a problem? > > In some cases I run a lot of batch jobs from Emacs (to be sure about > what is loaded in Emacs). This is not an example of problem. Can you give an example of a problem that vc-find-file-hook causes? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 12 12:17:36 2011 Received: (at 5374) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2011 16:17:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgfeS-0006f0-8R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:17:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgfeP-0006ek-EX for 5374@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:17:34 -0400 Received: by eye13 with SMTP id 13so2165629eye.3 for <5374@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:17:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6rPZtjNU9zt4j9C2jEdFACqo5/bbag1LCLUzv83H+iY=; b=A0gxyRLNn8/XHtDKoQlVp5AmiquQGWBIo+SWF5oEAS7ihxQP5AEaMXNztBE13QRXEG 4oyEGN3fcZwiR9Vj4sovoqu405YQ9rr7xYuiJNMoIAs0FlKhEc4wWFT7H0k8qLwCOHfg Bm04URKn2ZC28rBhPWCePaQsjX+a5ak44vuKQ= Received: by 10.213.22.74 with SMTP id m10mr72150ebb.117.1310487447194; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:17:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.114.16 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:17:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87hb6rmqor.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87hb6rmqor.fsf@stupidchicken.com> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:17:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#5374: vc-find-file-hook in batch? To: Chong Yidong Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5374 Cc: Glenn Morris , 5374@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 18:03, Chong Yidong wrote: > Lennart Borgman writes: > >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:15, Glenn Morris wrote: >>> Lennart Borgman wrote: >>> >>>> Should really vc-find-file-hook be in find-file-hook when Emacs is run >>>> in batch? Could not that create problems? >>> >>> Can you give an example of a problem? >> >> In some cases I run a lot of batch jobs from Emacs (to be sure about >> what is loaded in Emacs). > > This is not an example of problem. =C2=A0Can you give an example of a pro= blem > that vc-find-file-hook causes? It takes a lot of time to run the hook in this case, but other than that I see no problem. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 15 18:05:27 2011 Received: (at 5374-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2011 22:05:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhqVj-0004Kg-Jf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:05:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhqVh-0004KU-81 for 5374-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:05:25 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37537) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QhqVb-00042U-IG; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:05:19 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 5374-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#5374: vc-find-file-hook in batch? References: <87hb6rmqor.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-Spook: 9705 Samford Road FTS2000 AFSPC S Key Europol BLU-114/B X-Ran: t'mX1{S}$tq<[lc@6>TqP8"eY8$.kD_*+x>EZqsa3xMt"h|V;g;GiRr,.<-sKnPPuDF('n X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:05:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:17:07 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5374-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Lennart Borgman wrote: > It takes a lot of time to run the hook in this case, but other than > that I see no problem. OK. I don't think is reason enough to remove vc-find-file-hook in batch mode though. You can always remove it in your own personal use if you feel it necessary. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 18 10:44:36 2011 Received: (at 5374) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2011 14:44:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qip3j-00054E-Qc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:44:36 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qip3i-000541-Vz for 5374@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:44:35 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsQHAJNGJE5MCqt8/2dsb2JhbABUmHWOfniIfMJIhjwEnyeEMA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,222,1309752000"; d="scan'208";a="126504809" Received: from 76-10-171-124.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.171.124]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 18 Jul 2011 10:44:21 -0400 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5D1306660D; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:44:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: 5374@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#5374: vc-find-file-hook in batch? Message-ID: References: <87hb6rmqor.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:44:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:05:19 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5374 Cc: rgm@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) >> It takes a lot of time to run the hook in this case, but other than >> that I see no problem. > OK. I don't think is reason enough to remove vc-find-file-hook in batch > mode though. You can always remove it in your own personal use if you > feel it necessary. If it's a performance problem, the right fix is to profile it, find the culprit and fix it. Disabling vc-find-file-hook would just workaround the problem. Stefan From unknown Sun Sep 07 16:50:58 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator