GNU bug report logs - #53710
guix pull fails

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357 <at> gmail.com>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 53710 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#53710: "guix pull" doesn't have nice error messages in case of network errors
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 09:31:05 -0700

On 3/2/22 06:14, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès schreef op wo 02-03-2022 om 12:19 [+0100]:
>>> ./guix/serialization.scm:80:6: In procedure get-bytevector-n*:
>>> ERROR:
>>>    1. &nar-error:
>>>        file: #f
>>>        port: #<input-output: file 10>
>>> guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
>>> '/gnu/store/rx23w5k5nys4a2hjwcy4lampkhnslj3m-compute-guix-
>>> derivation'
>>> failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
>>> "787b13a5d9df8f0cc7170de1b80cead68b516c66"; system: "x86_64-linux";
>>> host version: "90a41fe388102d448b3f91a070e38a7680d2d568"; pull-
>>> version: 1).
>>> Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to
>>> <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>.
>> Thanks for reporting the issue.  Unfortunately, I suspect it was
>> “just”
>> a transient issue (probably a networking issue while downloading
>> substitutes for guile-ssh, which we see in the backtrace).  It’s
>> unfortunate that it crashed like that.
> Even if it's ‘only’ a networking issue, shouldn't it be reported
> better?  When "guix package -u" fails due to networking errors, the
> error messages are much clearer.  Why not the same for "guix pull"?
> Perhaps the issue should be reopened?
>
> Greetings,
> Maxime.
A proper error message would at least ensure this particular kind of 
crash does not prompt the end user to send a bug report. It would seem 
the real bug is communication to the user, "you found a bug, report it 
to the developers." instead of "Network error. Try later."

-- 
-Jesse Gibbons

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.