From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 26 17:25:45 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2022 22:25:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nCqjY-0006Mh-QQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:25:45 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40784) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nCqi0-0006KA-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:24:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCqhy-0007so-3k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:24:07 -0500 Received: from rdmp.org ([52.19.174.175]:37100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCqhw-0007Jo-Sj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:24:05 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=[IPv6:::1]) by rdmp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1nCqhu-0002E2-35 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 22:24:02 +0000 Message-ID: <5c45a856b27d319076357888e40d6c1cf5fc4271.camel@rdmp.org> Subject: Failing: guix package -i gtkmm@3 From: Dale Mellor To: bug-guix Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 22:24:01 +0000 Organization: DM Bespoke Computer Solutions Ltd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=52.19.174.175; envelope-from=guix-devel-0brg6a@rdmp.org; helo=rdmp.org X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:25:43 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: guix-devel-0brg6a@rdmp.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) The above command produces The following package will be installed: gtkmm 3.24.5 guix package: error: profile contains conflicting entries for libsigc++ guix package: error: first entry: libsigc++@3.0.6 /gnu/store/ng4k2yl94d758p5vnashd4nvyb1aw8s1-libsigc++-3.0.6 guix package: error: ... propagated from cairomm@1.14.2 guix package: error: ... propagated from gtkmm@3.24.5 guix package: error: second entry: libsigc++@2.9.3 /gnu/store/iad8jg1fm7jsq0pqj547f3n5s2jn9rp0-libsigc++-2.9.3 guix package: error: ... propagated from glibmm@2.64.5 guix package: error: ... propagated from pangomm@2.46.0 guix package: error: ... propagated from gtkmm@3.24.5 hint: You cannot have two different versions or variants of `gtkmm' in the same profile. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 29 13:42:23 2022 Received: (at 53561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2022 18:42:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDsg3-0002Fs-Mn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 13:42:23 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:46143) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDsg1-0002Fe-Tl for 53561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 13:42:22 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCF65C00EA; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 13:42:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 29 Jan 2022 13:42:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; bh=EySzoEqfe8qV94mOx4DYGDprj+u g/hE1WEt9RMBPCH4=; b=qjkVNHbhiZfKwGsratcAhHzhoNDrcddaRCr+tqjRt3g H3DNKNmihN8qR3tzL/WSuMTKdFlcl0IRzcWj9DKimYV28JscYdH+EbN22NHCM6AV E/fdFsJBsgX+2PXytZM/YDLT0eDnMkxFq0khkobGUI92QPqb6ZcndZlYGi/E+czg = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=EySzoEqfe8qV94mOx 4DYGDprj+ug/hE1WEt9RMBPCH4=; b=fEaVICOKCHlYogplQY99Cbv1hPCzJb+qt fgh1KAWS/nIj6iOoQHWRmBzuIAJek7aJUkFz0IK/fpl9rlF4DXgoJeq6Hs8kF+tP qhkqWuo6IL7w7zGxcQ+ukgedzsuGUcrkwUAuGPaAOsaesPnBvHhozxfg7jxqhqXX YY0iZtufo23ytGUb7KZVA2uuPHhNFglqFop8D3AzEp8f5M3k+mxaqBoZtVEoc7bj IM7K4tqShIo6vvqoKlUloWp9/4YORFVFiJeU3y/o6CC/loEwlWmMHOIbIQ+NmZUa vwRONdjdRH+8Jz6uE7KwkwAwdpivskIOea6erlzRUT38TCijpw0wQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrfeejgdduudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhue efiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheffvefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 13:42:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 13:42:14 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Dale Mellor Subject: Re: bug#53561: Failing: guix package -i gtkmm@3 Message-ID: References: <5c45a856b27d319076357888e40d6c1cf5fc4271.camel@rdmp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5c45a856b27d319076357888e40d6c1cf5fc4271.camel@rdmp.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53561 Cc: 53561@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:01PM +0000, Dale Mellor wrote: > The above command produces > > The following package will be installed: > gtkmm 3.24.5 > > guix package: error: profile contains conflicting entries for libsigc++ > guix package: error: first entry: libsigc++@3.0.6 /gnu/store/ng4k2yl94d758p5vnashd4nvyb1aw8s1-libsigc++-3.0.6 > guix package: error: ... propagated from cairomm@1.14.2 > guix package: error: ... propagated from gtkmm@3.24.5 > guix package: error: second entry: libsigc++@2.9.3 /gnu/store/iad8jg1fm7jsq0pqj547f3n5s2jn9rp0-libsigc++-2.9.3 > guix package: error: ... propagated from glibmm@2.64.5 > guix package: error: ... propagated from pangomm@2.46.0 > guix package: error: ... propagated from gtkmm@3.24.5 > hint: You cannot have two different versions or variants of `gtkmm' in the same profile. To clarify, what is the bug that you are reporting? Are you reporting that `guix package -i gtkmm@3` did not work? Or are you reporting that the hint mentions the wrong package? (I think it should talk about libsigc++, not gtkmm) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 29 19:56:10 2022 Received: (at 53561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2022 00:56:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35198 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDyVm-0006bf-5m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:56:10 -0500 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:44535) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDyVj-0006bH-3Y for 53561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:56:08 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D9D3200E5F; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:56:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:56:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from :from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; bh=0rSEynLT3eK scy9DOyAptI2x0g1TTccSA7B/+zWJUT4=; b=lsbJ6ftAFggFL3vxiESTlDpCGBj xFcK42k3jPicfM3rPFcnGTQtEIU4EfWoCrOwXrn+f7qVM4NHhctBHxXEWfugclQK JyhhnHgmcJOZ0GYhU/SjsWp3sJeooSpTxk7S4hLikEp1YZVYhLu9QrfR17nCJpEy a/YiwLDZdDrGsCBo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=0rSEynLT3eKscy9DOyAptI2x0g1TTccSA7B/+zWJU T4=; b=fY9l+KjshYi9EXa2yZpfPqoDxq45Fnq0gLcwdo7peidj2kShqsQGPj/1W bScxsUXh8vCJaIZSBxTthvxtpN3J8fGns0BQlc1UWQjhwY4OwRA7ynMz29/AnmNA UxjeOfKFj8W6h3rG8x5v3OtNAYqgNA9HphY4XQUB6zgvTCoXPQKqxGOPyqFdn3RL uyTUrEzbSSquC+l0Ln8n0ImdD8kjZWWdnp1VCVCx/yAbvdEVpi5JvfFQI1YNXTVt W9G9GZ2RwLGTCdjXaaqGVlLaF/ayZTQkifivUJ6RPHDeAf/1m+6yoeZEh1H62o6H ZE9CcyiQXvF8kyn22xqPbN0U5giRg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrfeekgddtkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesthekro dttddtudenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepuedttdegveeivdeigffhffekjeeile elkeekveevteefhfeijeekledvhfefteelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:56:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:55:58 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Dale Mellor Subject: Re: bug#53561: Failing: guix package -i gtkmm@3 Message-ID: References: <5c45a856b27d319076357888e40d6c1cf5fc4271.camel@rdmp.org> <1531652819c02abe9e095816895679a6d6719fe8.camel@rdmp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1531652819c02abe9e095816895679a6d6719fe8.camel@rdmp.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53561 Cc: 53561@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 12:37:06AM +0000, Dale Mellor wrote: > > > The following package will be installed: > > >    gtkmm 3.24.5 > > > > > > guix package: error: profile contains conflicting entries for libsigc++ > > > guix package: error:   first entry: libsigc++@3.0.6 /gnu/store/ng4k2yl94d758p5vnashd4nvyb1aw8s1-libsigc++-3.0.6 > > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from cairomm@1.14.2 > > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from gtkmm@3.24.5 > > > guix package: error:   second entry: libsigc++@2.9.3 /gnu/store/iad8jg1fm7jsq0pqj547f3n5s2jn9rp0-libsigc++-2.9.3 > > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from glibmm@2.64.5 > > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from pangomm@2.46.0 > > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from gtkmm@3.24.5 > > > hint: You cannot have two different versions or variants of `gtkmm' in the same profile. > > I'm reporting that it did not work. Okay. Is the hint unclear? The hint is saying that you are trying to install a package that would conflict with packages that are already installed. Specifically, you already have installed a package that "propagates" libsigc++. That means that the package installs libsigc++ alongside itself. Now, you are trying to install another package that propagates a different version of libsigc++. They cannot both be installed in the same profile. Guix includes two versions of libsigc++, but you cannot install both of them in the same generation of a profile. In general, I think that installing gtkmm is unusual. Gtkmm seems like something that is used by other programs internally rather than directly by users. What are you trying to accomplish by installing gtkmm? I'm very interesting in your experience with this situation, because other Guix users have expressed confusion with it. I'm planning to improve the documentation about these "conflicting entries" errors. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 29 19:59:12 2022 Received: (at 53561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2022 00:59:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDyYi-0006g7-M1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:59:12 -0500 Received: from rdmp.org ([52.19.174.175]:33916) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDyDR-00066o-I0 for 53561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:37:13 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=[IPv6:::1]) by rdmp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1nDyDL-0004Li-3I; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 00:37:07 +0000 Message-ID: <1531652819c02abe9e095816895679a6d6719fe8.camel@rdmp.org> Subject: Re: bug#53561: Failing: guix package -i gtkmm@3 From: Dale Mellor To: Leo Famulari , 53561@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 00:37:06 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <5c45a856b27d319076357888e40d6c1cf5fc4271.camel@rdmp.org> Organization: DM Bespoke Computer Solutions Ltd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 13:42 -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:01PM +0000, Dale Mellor wrote: > > The above command produces > > > > The following package will be installed: > [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.9 SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53561 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:59:11 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: guix-devel-0brg6a@rdmp.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 13:42 -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:01PM +0000, Dale Mellor wrote: > > The above command produces > > > > The following package will be installed: > >    gtkmm 3.24.5 > > > > guix package: error: profile contains conflicting entries for libsigc++ > > guix package: error:   first entry: libsigc++@3.0.6 /gnu/store/ng4k2yl94d758p5vnashd4nvyb1aw8s1-libsigc++-3.0.6 > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from cairomm@1.14.2 > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from gtkmm@3.24.5 > > guix package: error:   second entry: libsigc++@2.9.3 /gnu/store/iad8jg1fm7jsq0pqj547f3n5s2jn9rp0-libsigc++-2.9.3 > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from glibmm@2.64.5 > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from pangomm@2.46.0 > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from gtkmm@3.24.5 > > hint: You cannot have two different versions or variants of `gtkmm' in the same profile. > > To clarify, what is the bug that you are reporting? > > Are you reporting that `guix package -i gtkmm@3` did not work? > > Or are you reporting that the hint mentions the wrong package? (I think > it should talk about libsigc++, not gtkmm) I'm reporting that it did not work. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 30 05:01:50 2022 Received: (at 53561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2022 10:01:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35618 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nE71p-0004UO-TB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 05:01:50 -0500 Received: from rdmp.org ([52.19.174.175]:34116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nE71o-0004UC-Qj for 53561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 05:01:49 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=[IPv6:::1]) by rdmp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1nE71i-0004ca-Gp; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 10:01:42 +0000 Message-ID: <81cbc842d9eebb9ee95044d37d97fc0d47ff9ea5.camel@rdmp.org> Subject: Re: bug#53561: Failing: guix package -i gtkmm@3 From: Dale Mellor To: Leo Famulari Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 10:01:41 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <5c45a856b27d319076357888e40d6c1cf5fc4271.camel@rdmp.org> <1531652819c02abe9e095816895679a6d6719fe8.camel@rdmp.org> Organization: DM Bespoke Computer Solutions Ltd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 19:55 -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 12:37:06AM +0000, Dale Mellor wrote: > > > > The following package will be installed: > > > >    gtkmm 3.24.5 > > > > [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.9 SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53561 Cc: 53561@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: guix-devel-0brg6a@rdmp.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 19:55 -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 12:37:06AM +0000, Dale Mellor wrote: > > > > The following package will be installed: > > > >    gtkmm 3.24.5 > > > > > > > > guix package: error: profile contains conflicting entries for libsigc++ > > > > guix package: error:   first entry: libsigc++@3.0.6 /gnu/store/ng4k2yl94d758p5vnashd4nvyb1aw8s1-libsigc++-3.0.6 > > > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from cairomm@1.14.2 > > > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from gtkmm@3.24.5 > > > > guix package: error:   second entry: libsigc++@2.9.3 /gnu/store/iad8jg1fm7jsq0pqj547f3n5s2jn9rp0-libsigc++-2.9.3 > > > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from glibmm@2.64.5 > > > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from pangomm@2.46.0 > > > > guix package: error:    ... propagated from gtkmm@3.24.5 > > > > hint: You cannot have two different versions or variants of `gtkmm' in the same profile. > > > >   I'm reporting that it did not work. > > Okay. Is the hint unclear? Not to me it's not. You however don't seem to get it... > The hint is saying that you are trying to install a package that would > conflict with packages that are already installed. No it isn't. It is saying that the package definitions for gtkmm and its dependencies are inconsistent. > Specifically, you already have installed a package that "propagates" > libsigc++. That means that the package installs libsigc++ alongside > itself. I haven't. Please try to get your head around this. > Now, you are trying to install another package that propagates a > different version of libsigc++. They cannot both be installed in the > same profile. I am trying to install a package, defined right there in the GUIX repo, which propagates two different versions of libsigc++. Please try to get your head around this. > Guix includes two versions of libsigc++, but you cannot install both of > them in the same generation of a profile. I agree with you here. > In general, I think that installing gtkmm is unusual. Gtkmm seems like > something that is used by other programs internally rather than directly > by users. What are you trying to accomplish by installing gtkmm? My software builds against it. > I'm very interesting in your experience with this situation, because > other Guix users have expressed confusion with it. I'm planning to > improve the documentation about these "conflicting entries" errors. I would suggest asking someone else to write the documentation; you don't seem to understand it well enough. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 30 06:55:26 2022 Received: (at 53561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2022 11:55:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35698 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nE8nm-0007iS-0w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 06:55:26 -0500 Received: from rdmp.org ([52.19.174.175]:34178) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nE8nj-0007iE-Tn for 53561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 06:55:25 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=[IPv6:::1]) by rdmp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1nE8nd-0004fM-JH; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 11:55:17 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#53561: I APOLOGIZE From: Dale Mellor To: Leo Famulari Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 11:55:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <81cbc842d9eebb9ee95044d37d97fc0d47ff9ea5.camel@rdmp.org> References: <5c45a856b27d319076357888e40d6c1cf5fc4271.camel@rdmp.org> <1531652819c02abe9e095816895679a6d6719fe8.camel@rdmp.org> <81cbc842d9eebb9ee95044d37d97fc0d47ff9ea5.camel@rdmp.org> Organization: DM Bespoke Computer Solutions Ltd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I take back everything that I said in the previous message; I sent it quicker than I should have, I'm sorry. I still don't think the documentation needs changing, just those error messages need to be made clearer. Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.9 SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53561 Cc: 53561@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: guix-devel-0brg6a@rdmp.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) I take back everything that I said in the previous message; I sent it quicker than I should have, I'm sorry. I still don't think the documentation needs changing, just those error messages need to be made clearer. This issue can be closed now, thank you. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 30 13:25:12 2022 Received: (at 53561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2022 18:25:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nEEsx-0004IT-Qu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:25:12 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:55719) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nEEsv-0004IC-6i for 53561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:25:09 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEF65C00F7; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:25:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:25:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; bh=Mvlm6sSIzRTCT+I1T2MxeIHBKvi U/LGLrZHDqAsapOU=; b=Tt7TaSodQfiTJPO6zDsH39RPr5iWAmwGkDZBNLsS1rI hkrMCwb2gIDzycHH8D8nDU9jxyneAHplf/uLQeVKOsjZHGV5Q23m1P0P9CNn8FLz E3lMNHsDp0NQzMK8ry0UrjlQkAn8F63GR0hZbJ6Z4MCclhHH9ovLIAVw6rcxaCJ4 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Mvlm6sSIzRTCT+I1T 2MxeIHBKviU/LGLrZHDqAsapOU=; b=OWPELsVXvyl8/rMnIAKfsKB58zD04UByU 4iWEC02m/RKvj+oKepdlWZ2XXAxLsQti4T7lUChFXJQclMBvEY2uTCIebM5mNBto VDMFMnOQ4h4FPqsalgCg3nh1aZXPd2AnyQUc3uJ3ysYDibisVktqTpmUbo85CtW/ LGftLdj7obg1jtz0n2/R92uJL0EYeDSj29SzjrrSzC8hRatEZC5Z8eOwBPF+CxDp 9ArVY44AbwvguX9myQHkpEtiPJaibQEAXj5rvbSJ2jLhH3lghIbt32iYMIH8hWYo jeP96RwtJnDSQo4fiqN0yxGDx9/ym7AhHzVhqnSmyMou+BVaGo6mQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrfeelgdduuddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhue efiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheffvefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:25:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:25:01 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Dale Mellor Subject: Re: bug#53561: Failing: guix package -i gtkmm@3 Message-ID: References: <5c45a856b27d319076357888e40d6c1cf5fc4271.camel@rdmp.org> <1531652819c02abe9e095816895679a6d6719fe8.camel@rdmp.org> <81cbc842d9eebb9ee95044d37d97fc0d47ff9ea5.camel@rdmp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81cbc842d9eebb9ee95044d37d97fc0d47ff9ea5.camel@rdmp.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53561 Cc: 53561@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 10:01:41AM +0000, Dale Mellor wrote: > I am trying to install a package, defined right there in the GUIX repo, which propagates two different versions of > libsigc++. I see. That should be fixed. It's true that my earlier reply was kind of dense, but you didn't put any effort into your initial report, and thus you did not communicate the problem effectively. You have to understand that we triage bug reports from people with all levels of skill and experience.