GNU bug report logs - #53523
[PATCH] gnu: Add tree-sitter.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #23 received at 53523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Luis Henrique Gomes Higino <luishenriquegh2701 <at> gmail.com>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>, 53523 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#53523] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add neovim-luajit.
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:07:04 -0300

Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:39:05PM +0000, Maxime Devos wrote:
>> Luis Henrique Gomes Higino schreef op di 25-01-2022 om 13:56 
>> [-0300]:
>> > * gnu/packages/vim.scm (neovim-luajit): New variable.
>> > +(define-public neovim-luajit
>> > +  (package
>> > +    (inherit neovim)
>> > +    (name "neovim-luajit")
>> > +    (inputs (modify-inputs (package-inputs neovim)
>> > +              (replace "lua" luajit)))
>> > +    (arguments
>> > +     (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments 
>> > neovim)
>> > +       ((#:configure-flags cf) `(delete 
>> > "-DPREFER_LUA:BOOL=YES"
>> > +                                        ,cf))))
>> > +    (synopsis
>> > + "Fork of vim focused on extensibility and agility - built 
>> > with
LuaJIT")))
>> 
>> Does this need to be a separate package?  I.e., can we use 
>> luajit
>> in the 'neovim' package on systems that support luajit, so not 
>> for
>> powerpc)?
>
> I believe in the past we've discussed using luajit as the 
> default lua
> for neovim. My guess is we should fall back to lua(-5.1?) on
> (not (package-supported-system luajit))

Yes, I believe this is the best solution if it is acceptable by 
Guix standards.

-- 
Regards,
Luis H. Higino

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.