From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:10:24 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#53504 <53504@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#53504 <53504@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU Emacs 28.0.91 ?? Reply-To: bug#53504 <53504@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:10:24 +0000 retitle 53504 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU Emacs 28= .0.91 ?? reassign 53504 emacs submitter 53504 Auntie Carol severity 53504 normal tag 53504 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 24 10:38:56 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2022 15:38:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45388 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC1Qk-0002Wj-CA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:38:56 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBzAC-0005iT-8F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 08:13:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBzAC-0007pX-2h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 08:13:40 -0500 Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b] (port=46722 helo=mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBzA7-0003Co-V6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 08:13:39 -0500 Received: by mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com with SMTP id p5so51041698ybd.13 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 05:13:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+v/TnrXrzzhjxn5UynuCWBpRbHAtx1mCZd9RmTipsDE=; b=ijjTcifqKzUduYgVGoTLiho4PBRsZF9RfnIRFfefcoaCvo8oez+GdLvmhd3z82+De0 4XBoGYD2ZLYN9BCodiZKAlWSrwtxFQf7IB2Xcwc7XNA/lRFiVouZs+OBrsLJ/LchciQd n/K4zkSzEYLEcA2KBeg6dtmPQeSmrJnAtkfgObKBPbFYIy0z1SjpX+t8s23Mi343od+O cp0bvmnrhul5bm02E44+77EgaiBVoNrMxCLHB+YWe2Y351xIuk4LKL54y8/Hkew4hUXP C9h5hN0fV87GE96cJ/5iYcEGfeKZ+t4kqF7hyhNY9xny0xSuentlAA0lCB2evnXY65I6 W7GA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+v/TnrXrzzhjxn5UynuCWBpRbHAtx1mCZd9RmTipsDE=; b=AIWLl7DE8WFG7DzIBRPrKyE6Gg6SZhJAwU++xTbkJ+SSmrnpasnwdIVml5Q88XCDjt 9UMBpym3FMK9T9ecvm6ovf5F/2zBgIn8GCO2EG3oIGZR8HPfWsf7qPXJObrUdth2xgSW CjHIq8W7ZpxMHMCVsPNc5NK2AZfJFkN2zg4skuBxuonINXaMhB5gc+Fx82/dgQIV8IQB 7/k996apxXWINrQ+aOPaB96cTgOZcit7+g4bnXgassVvuK0r1nwURqruZx2gz58YntsZ 68Xiv35xFFXRnLGZgwx46yZblIBuABCa9Ziw0SngEzHdC+AQX8bNoUV9cNnUtbTK1YLD mvKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313bs1XED1Cb2q6VGg4CnnabIxgM9U65UIdmr3gihPl1Imv5YpW 8l4FqK2hRCZ1ZxVrAHgFrlr92FyNkplZ5YXUnAfWxJFXg+56Nu7S X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyokEnAC6czPYBHUDshQUSkTN5o0nun9rX1PN98HvqPu195XqKD/KjPzguhM7yG9Ar7Ucjo0H7o6Im1f4V/c6k= X-Received: by 2002:a25:b783:: with SMTP id n3mr21889184ybh.73.1643030011615; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 05:13:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Auntie Carol Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:13:18 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU Emacs 28.0.91 ?? To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000329d7805d653bc20" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b; envelope-from=centzon.totochtin@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:38:52 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --000000000000329d7805d653bc20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've been building from Savannah's main branch for the last couple of months. Yesterday I decided to "roll back" to 28.0.91 and ran into the following errors: 2 unexpected results: FAILED emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout FAILED emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout And compilation does not complete. All works as it should when ` check` is removed from the make directive. kernel (supplied by Pop!_OS): 5.15.8-76051508-generic gcc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-7ubuntu2): 11.2.0 Don't know if this is a bug or my system. Anyway, thanks! CT =3D=3D=3D guts of the build script =3D=3D=3D export CC=3D"gcc-10" ./autogen.sh ./configure \ --with-native-compilation \ --with-gnutls=3Difavailable \ --with-json \ --with-jpeg \ --with-pgtk \ --with-png \ --with-rsvg \ --with-tiff \ --with-wide-int \ --with-xft \ --with-xinput2 \ --with-xml2 \ --with-xpm make check && sudo make install =3D=3D=3D cat ./test/src/emacs-tests.log =3D=3D=3D cat ./test/src/emacs-tests.log Running 7 tests (2022-01-23 14:59:43+0000, selector =E2=80=98(not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp)))=E2=80=99) Test emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout backtrace: signal(ert-test-failed (((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql 159 0) : ert-fail(((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql 159 0) :value nil)) #f(compiled-function () #)() ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout :docu ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector (not (or (tag :expensi ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) (tag :n ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) ( ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit '(not (or (tag :expensive-test) ( command-line-1(("-L" ":." "-l" "ert" "-l" "src/emacs-tests" "--eval" command-line() normal-top-level() Test emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout condition: Info: Process output: (ert-test-failed ((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql 159 0) :value nil)) FAILED 1/7 emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout (0.227544 sec) passed 2/7 emacs-tests/seccomp/absent-file (0.044747 sec) Test emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout backtrace: signal(ert-test-failed (((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql "Bad sys ert-fail(((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql "Bad system call" 0) :v #f(compiled-function () #)() ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout :do ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector (not (or ... ... ...)) ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) (tag :n ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) ( ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit '(not (or (tag :expensive-test) ( command-line-1(("-L" ":." "-l" "ert" "-l" "src/emacs-tests" "--eval" command-line() normal-top-level() Test emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout condition: Info: Process output: (ert-test-failed ((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql "Bad system call" 0) :value nil)) FAILED 3/7 emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout (0.277550 sec) passed 4/7 emacs-tests/seccomp/empty-file (0.040075 sec) passed 5/7 emacs-tests/seccomp/file-too-large (0.124284 sec) passed 6/7 emacs-tests/seccomp/forbids-subprocess (0.307874 sec) passed 7/7 emacs-tests/seccomp/invalid-file-size (0.049196 sec) Ran 7 tests, 5 results as expected, 2 unexpected (2022-01-23 14:59:45+0000, 1.329448 sec) 2 unexpected results: FAILED emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout FAILED emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout --000000000000329d7805d653bc20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've been building from Savannah's main branch for= the last couple of months. Yesterday I decided to "roll back" to= 28.0.91 and ran into the following errors:

2 unexpected results:=C2=A0 =C2=A0FAILED =C2=A0emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout
=C2=A0 =C2=A0= FAILED =C2=A0emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout

And compilation does = not complete.
All works as it should when ` check` is removed from the m= ake directive.

kernel (supplied by Pop!_OS): 5.15.8-76051508-generi= c
gcc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-7ubuntu2): 11.2.0

Don'= t know if this is a bug or my system. Anyway, thanks!

CT

=3D= =3D=3D guts of the build script =3D=3D=3D
export CC=3D"gcc-10"=
./autogen.sh
./configure \
--with-native-compilation =C2=A0\
-= -with-gnutls=3Difavailable \
--with-json \
--with-jpeg \
--with-pg= tk \
--with-png \
--with-rsvg \
--with-tiff \
--with-wide-int \=
--with-xft \
--with-xinput2 \
--with-xml2 \
--with-xpm
make= check && sudo make install

=3D=3D=3D cat ./test/src/emacs-t= ests.log =3D=3D=3D
cat ./test/src/emacs-tests.log
Running 7 tests (20= 22-01-23 14:59:43+0000, selector =E2=80=98(not (or (tag :expensive-test) (t= ag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp)))=E2=80=99)
Test emacs-tests/bwrap/allow= s-stdout backtrace:
=C2=A0 signal(ert-test-failed (((should (eql status = 0)) :form (eql 159 0) :
=C2=A0 ert-fail(((should (eql status 0)) :form (= eql 159 0) :value nil))
=C2=A0 #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode 0x9= 1b1991a23835a9>)()
=C2=A0 ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-executi= on-info :test #s(ert-test
=C2=A0 ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name emacs-te= sts/bwrap/allows-stdout :docu
=C2=A0 ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats= :selector (not (or (tag :expensi
=C2=A0 ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :ex= pensive-test) (tag :unstable) (tag :n
=C2=A0 ert-run-tests-batch((not (o= r (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) (
=C2=A0 ert-run-tests-batch-and= -exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un
=C2=A0 eval((ert-run-tests= -batch-and-exit '(not (or (tag :expensive-test) (
=C2=A0 command-lin= e-1(("-L" ":." "-l" "ert" "-l&= quot; "src/emacs-tests" "--eval"
=C2=A0 command-line= ()
=C2=A0 normal-top-level()
Test emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout con= dition:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Info: Process output:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 (ert-test-f= ailed
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0((should
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(eql st= atus 0))
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 :form
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 (eql 159 0)<= br>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 :value nil))
=C2=A0 =C2=A0FAILED =C2=A01/7 =C2= =A0emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout (0.227544 sec)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0passed = =C2=A02/7 =C2=A0emacs-tests/seccomp/absent-file (0.044747 sec)
Test emac= s-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout backtrace:
=C2=A0 signal(ert-test-failed (= ((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql "Bad sys
=C2=A0 ert-fail(((shou= ld (eql status 0)) :form (eql "Bad system call" 0) :v
=C2=A0 #= f(compiled-function () #<bytecode 0x1354e77c9d8677f7>)()
=C2=A0 er= t--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
=C2= =A0 ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout :do=C2=A0 ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector (not (or ... ... ...)= )
=C2=A0 ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) (t= ag :n
=C2=A0 ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un= stable) (
=C2=A0 ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-t= est) (tag :un
=C2=A0 eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit '(not (or (t= ag :expensive-test) (
=C2=A0 command-line-1(("-L" ":.&quo= t; "-l" "ert" "-l" "src/emacs-tests"= ; "--eval"
=C2=A0 command-line()
=C2=A0 normal-top-level()<= br>Test emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout condition:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Info:= Process output:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 (ert-test-failed
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(= (should
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(eql status 0))
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 :form
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 (eql "Bad system call" 0)
= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 :value nil))
=C2=A0 =C2=A0FAILED =C2=A03/7 =C2=A0em= acs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout (0.277550 sec)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0passed =C2= =A04/7 =C2=A0emacs-tests/seccomp/empty-file (0.040075 sec)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0= passed =C2=A05/7 =C2=A0emacs-tests/seccomp/file-too-large (0.124284 sec)=C2=A0 =C2=A0passed =C2=A06/7 =C2=A0emacs-tests/seccomp/forbids-subprocess= (0.307874 sec)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0passed =C2=A07/7 =C2=A0emacs-tests/seccomp/= invalid-file-size (0.049196 sec)
Ran 7 tests, 5 results as expected, 2 u= nexpected (2022-01-23 14:59:45+0000, 1.329448 sec)
2 unexpected results:=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0FAILED =C2=A0emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout
=C2=A0 =C2= =A0FAILED =C2=A0emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout
--000000000000329d7805d653bc20-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 24 10:45:16 2022 Received: (at 53504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2022 15:45:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45393 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC1Wt-0002hV-PC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:45:15 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52328) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC1Wq-0002h1-HJ for 53504@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:45:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iDd+TEjCS0Um3cdGywPJ4iJYQZp6+FawxK1ydXW66XM=; b=uyzGj1MoQngYUIXiaVReOFrFCE G9bJ7dp5yvPxMBWi/SMH1PgruvBJHo9TpcLXejK76fM1HmDhtRMvQylKDnuJ3KGJM6PIkerQAcQzm riiEXsIdJi3oYahZc3yAN0dCAm7S7CmuAxmYayKO8cwSdhOv9pyyS6cVM1QSVLhj5fYU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nC1Wh-0000eA-0R; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:45:05 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Auntie Carol Subject: Re: bug#53504: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU Emacs 28.0.91 ?? References: Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEVAOkVCPEU5Mzj/ //9zPAoYAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAd0SU1FB+YBGA8sBJEE7HUAAAG1SURBVCjPLdDBbptAEAbg MUol6hMgjJKcMFIlvE9BLR/cnJqKQTGn+IBk71Ng1FZ0T4klI9cngupqmafMLITD7n7amX9HwK04 WFVoEbUhgBI6otiirrVKEKJsiSq+iUqwhaYRpMGWH9CMp7WBVVetYCzryqAtRcs9E8UFOgx5Xa+3 FbVeHZmAWKKlY09HtUGMvg2MkGqwHfQBHB2ZAOlimoC3iEoZA+lHfxl6NpzyBUz1E0Do2zczRHgQ Nvd4n60B09IHTNPEwRmsV2UwwdRP3BWjiAOuwMS5Qdh9pRHfQwQxVwGfuUteQexU4xjg8gRyR4x0 liKnUUy/z3P/V4pFwePQ//N25iJuEEhQUxfOHZchyI0KVOpPTCLscVrV37JXxAIh31Ont+mnDPMT kKQu3uLwAfXU0ZxPj9mGIY5avPzNMOOyPZl/XQfDO9xEpKibFTwOcQ8jvuOpOaBRDLoNe4a+KHFP nfvlzIP2zSUJ9LGUmnt0cy6yn3RIFyaA6BmlKlfuCIE5vYg/I+h4laXsR8imlw0dPm5ee156kAMu V16GcUiKi9n0gAepzDY3+Pcjvzd4ewd89O+M+1oisAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMi0w MS0yNFQxNTo0NDowNCswMDowMDh+VuQAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMDEtMjRUMTU6 NDQ6MDQrMDA6MDBJI+5YAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: New Order's _Brotherhood_: "Way of Life" Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:45:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Auntie Carol's message of "Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:13:18 +0000") Message-ID: <87o8415e9u.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Auntie Carol writes: > I've been building from Savannah's main branch for the last couple of months. > Yesterday I decided to "roll back" to 28.0.91 and ran into the following errors: > > 2 unexpected results: > FAILED em [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53504 Cc: 53504@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Auntie Carol writes: > I've been building from Savannah's main branch for the last couple of months. > Yesterday I decided to "roll back" to 28.0.91 and ran into the following errors: > > 2 unexpected results: > FAILED emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout > FAILED emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout > > And compilation does not complete. > All works as it should when ` check` is removed from the make directive. There have been seccomp fixes in the emacs-28 branch earlier today -- can you try to update and rebuild Emacs and check whether the problem is still present? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 24 10:45:22 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2022 15:45:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45396 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC1Wz-0002hn-W5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:45:22 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52342) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC1Wy-0002hU-D9 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:45:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=OsGRg6cypbpl4yQwW9HhagIdfwklOW68suGKENHTiKc=; b=hPB3S2jhQYQz+aRBx1ZGGJedZp GGL1woYlTIAtBbBHWdi4wqf6+k3ygOuuaYTV6qTGDWQT2rkFKAyc76P91RvX2XSB71Ren2O3oohYm 6VlQHsYRi5efhccKmVd14dWqopytJLFCwf3HI/Z3vjAGRvwAEQj/1/elXJtb0SOGTad0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nC1Wq-0000eL-DJ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:45:14 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:45:11 +0100 Message-Id: <87mtjl5e9k.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #53504 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 53504 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 53504 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 24 13:33:31 2022 Received: (at 53504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2022 18:33:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45811 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC49i-0004Cd-CG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:33:30 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-f172.google.com ([209.85.219.172]:33486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC3wU-0003my-NX for 53504@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:19:51 -0500 Received: by mail-yb1-f172.google.com with SMTP id l68so53459234ybl.0 for <53504@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:19:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yTaF34ro+x+tPXLv956HiQKyC4zAc0seWfMd7JtFVJ8=; b=aJVdCBQAW2N5zAW8lCmroctv0hPh/Lc75dIYG14960pBrkZEyJ7nteZiu9k94wexxL ZVKThL4aMoe+GVst6Pv9MZK/QLu7nVomWEZYB01+ASfWCfMR+zVTd670JTOMemQHG7Oc j7ZFrrFc43FbrC7k8sgEUlALc31h04xdP17Aacc90qkizk5MKfbLsQXVI0nlZz71Do9z vcAH7ckNYE29UdjOLD+L6q7V9P9ZQWWZsrrEeZWmhf8cm3loLpzAWpsNvEMQ7D2pvD7w 99+KHP7P/K1GYtMjWQ+EnZqG3Sb9oI02mGac1N5OTJXTLIlo4Wq5JMU4HCbPGH5CETE2 gmxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yTaF34ro+x+tPXLv956HiQKyC4zAc0seWfMd7JtFVJ8=; b=nujCepij/pY488/NY7boWLNekKXguT07nE6JUCmC++EHzhNtnkzvE98RoUCBqUNAa3 B90pw57kmTsRDS8xYifbROoOyvc5IcB6rXoDytGkZ9SXm08skcYeu2iK6JBiXzlggAd4 DKdpn8hUlP5nNiQ5/yVsEJ8/Nz3khLbIbhB8LbZ6qOQCQKtXW/XHGsEwsKLDLBXtNCu8 E2rmfnAaBIyTua/7inC4VNxmEnrAtxFwEJOVqJ5uOLr/Ds3A11dkG9w/E4Z/OqlCE7pC 2C7YW7+CmT0KSLpfq2lZ5B51f7Wa34DOvOmRP0Y1gcAfLFRR8SX3o6Oc4C9pLym2KgRR g5Bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AozxOQ9xUbjJwUZNNPGzYaevPFSy5TCi3zWUtoPPShPlNRiD7 vllxaaZ/qwAUmO6svi2kbUS3hchddlzm8zp5e2VCA5zVbXpTDwX+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMHyPc9avTzJpJ04KianbX6KP2Rl24HrbcE+qCee1uBYDRj5kXmInTAZFXKpBUcUPx1ct6BN8p8npJy7FHPak= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:3ce:: with SMTP id t14mr23366617ybp.361.1643048385075; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:19:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87o8415e9u.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <87o8415e9u.fsf@gnus.org> From: Auntie Carol Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:19:32 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#53504: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU Emacs 28.0.91 ?? To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000575f1305d65803f5" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53504 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:33:28 -0500 Cc: 53504@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --000000000000575f1305d65803f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 3:45 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Auntie Carol writes: > > > I've been building from Savannah's main branch for the last couple of > months. > > Yesterday I decided to "roll back" to 28.0.91 and ran into the following > errors: > > > > 2 unexpected results: > > FAILED emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout > > FAILED emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout > > > > And compilation does not complete. > > All works as it should when ` check` is removed from the make directive. > > There have been seccomp fixes in the emacs-28 branch earlier today -- > can you try to update and rebuild Emacs and check whether the problem is > still present? > > There is still a failure to compile. albeit with different errors now: ~/src/emacs on HEAD (d193801) == >> GEN src/xml-tests.log make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/yearluk/src/emacs/test' make[2]: [Makefile:335: check-doit] Error 2 (ignored) SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ----------------------- Files examined: 375 Ran 5608 tests, 5466 results as expected, 33 unexpected, 109 skipped 10 files contained unexpected results: src/emacs-tests.log lisp/wdired-tests.log lisp/simple-tests.log lisp/progmodes/xref-tests.log lisp/progmodes/project-tests.log lisp/gnus/mml-sec-tests.log lisp/files-tests.log lisp/cedet/semantic-utest-ia.log lisp/autorevert-tests.log lisp/net/tramp-tests.log make[2]: *** [Makefile:336: check-doit] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/yearluk/src/emacs/test' make[1]: *** [Makefile:305: check] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/yearluk/src/emacs/test' make: *** [Makefile:994: check] Error 2 --000000000000575f1305d65803f5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 3:45 PM Lars = Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> w= rote:
Auntie Car= ol <cen= tzon.totochtin@gmail.com> writes:

> I've been building from Savannah's main branch for the last co= uple of months.
> Yesterday I decided to "roll back" to 28.0.91 and ran into t= he following errors:
>
> 2 unexpected results:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 FAILED=C2=A0 emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout
>
> And compilation does not complete.
> All works as it should when ` check` is removed from the make directiv= e.

There have been seccomp fixes in the emacs-28 branch earlier today --
can you try to update and rebuild Emacs and check whether the problem is still present?

There is= still a failure to compile. albeit with different errors now:
=

=C2=A0~/src/emacs on=C2=A0 HEAD (d193801)

=3D=3D >>

GEN =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0src/xml-tests.log
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/yearluk/src/e= macs/test'
make[2]: [Makefile:335: check-doit] Error 2 (ignored)
=
SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
-----------------------
Files examined: 3= 75
Ran 5608 tests, 5466 results as expected, 33 unexpected, 109 skipped<= br>10 files contained unexpected results:
=C2=A0 src/emacs-tests.log
= =C2=A0 lisp/wdired-tests.log
=C2=A0 lisp/simple-tests.log
=C2=A0 lisp= /progmodes/xref-tests.log
=C2=A0 lisp/progmodes/project-tests.log
=C2= =A0 lisp/gnus/mml-sec-tests.log
=C2=A0 lisp/files-tests.log
=C2=A0 li= sp/cedet/semantic-utest-ia.log
=C2=A0 lisp/autorevert-tests.log
=C2= =A0 lisp/net/tramp-tests.log
make[2]: *** [Makefile:336: check-doit] Err= or 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/yearluk/src/emacs/test'make[1]: *** [Makefile:305: check] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory = '/home/yearluk/src/emacs/test'
make: *** [Makefile:994: che= ck] Error 2=C2=A0
--000000000000575f1305d65803f5-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 24 13:36:10 2022 Received: (at 53504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2022 18:36:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45823 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC4CI-0004I0-HR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:36:10 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54264) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nC4CH-0004Hn-1a for 53504@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:36:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wnXRnUSE5AksM3FayKU4pMXgKXiVG7Knif+lnp+jYG0=; b=SgBVbHhGo/U8fkZ3Rb2UriaQO/ b1qAfSZOPvWHizJh2wdJkSZtPPOA753LRc+I0D0K0etsQM78EARLm8E6fw+4Q2QP81dS/uwBoIunI e9OPc+fNrIAPYCly73W71jNoqK0OFaPFYT2y2Hy9VmshYsmQNXx+hNfBy0UAQNPyBxNc=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nC4C7-0002KD-VL; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:36:02 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Auntie Carol Subject: Re: bug#53504: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU Emacs 28.0.91 ?? References: <87o8415e9u.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Joe Jackson's _Big World_: "Wild West" Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:35:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Auntie Carol's message of "Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:19:32 +0000") Message-ID: <87o8412d81.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Auntie Carol writes: > There is still a failure to compile. albeit with different errors now: With "failure to compile", you mean that the tests fail? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53504 Cc: 53504@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Auntie Carol writes: > There is still a failure to compile. albeit with different errors now: With "failure to compile", you mean that the tests fail? > 10 files contained unexpected results: > src/emacs-tests.log > lisp/wdired-tests.log > lisp/simple-tests.log > lisp/progmodes/xref-tests.log > lisp/progmodes/project-tests.log > lisp/gnus/mml-sec-tests.log > lisp/files-tests.log > lisp/cedet/semantic-utest-ia.log > lisp/autorevert-tests.log > lisp/net/tramp-tests.log So you got (at least) eight new test failures in the version from today compared to the one from yesterday? That's very odd. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 22 08:54:24 2022 Received: (at 53504) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2022 13:54:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40435 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nMVcW-0005e4-4D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:54:24 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nMVcU-0005dr-JU for 53504@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:54:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EdN29U1kbU2UgdxxLFEB/OUl6dqGoZzmwGMTKmDAKdQ=; b=r7DveQwEL9JvTcdhPVZ1LrJ6aa wCL+E5DUcCOWoIld20km1PGjwpNPp6N5g0SHGaWqYcxLbin+Uk8s9DaVLtKnlu+cMB6KwTy94tH+r kLv9MHmatAmtVfQSwGVzwtyO8ycv9dE/ycOEwpzb4DqpKC/tPKwjfPuijniNGvZys+7I=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nMVcL-0005xo-A2; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 14:54:16 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Auntie Carol Subject: Re: bug#53504: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU Emacs 28.0.91 ?? References: <87o8415e9u.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8412d81.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Xiu Xiu's _The Passenger_: "The Passenger" Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 14:54:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87o8412d81.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:35:58 +0100") Message-ID: <87ley3atx7.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So you got (at least) eight new test failures in the version from today > compared to the one from yesterday? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53504 Cc: 53504@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So you got (at least) eight new test failures in the version from today > compared to the one from yesterday? More information was requested, but no response was given within a month, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 22 08:54:29 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2022 13:54:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40438 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nMVcb-0005eQ-Bo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:54:29 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51542) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nMVcZ-0005dx-Ow for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:54:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HjkzcgpHWTPpSkQ/QxT/znFzBsYM7jXFSv3DByXl6XM=; b=RUUKlbCOo1KrV8tEP0eyCpnqPF JalM9rfhV4Pkl/59jlbAGqHclTk+JMzAKicLb1Z6Ozh50WJZGGPfHNs4iuWvGQ7qwlFh0Psw5Zoj5 UOCyG+hUeQScnNP0GqZDhj2/uchcnRseokgDYCBrMrXQrLPnp0tQsK2TcRmKiT6xAYZo=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nMVcR-0005ya-IY for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 14:54:22 +0100 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 14:54:18 +0100 Message-Id: <87k0dnatx1.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #53504 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 53504 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 53504 quit From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:10:24 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator