GNU bug report logs - #5347
23.1; M-x man: misreports absent man(1) as absent manpage.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: trentbuck <at> gmail.com

Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:15:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #29 received at 5347 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Trent W. Buck" <trentbuck <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 5347 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#5347: 23.1; M-x man: misreports absent man(1) as absent
	manpage.
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:59:31 +1100
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Why is the use-case of having man pages but not man(1) so important
> that it's worth catering to?

I was merely being pedantic re "cannot know" versus "not worth the
effort".  The original case arose because I forgot what system I was
on and ran man instead of woman, and the error briefly confused me.

A peonland solution would simply be to put in my .emacs:

    (unless (executable-find "man")
      (defalias 'man 'woman))

> Maybe it would be good enough to change
>
> 		(error "Can't find the %s manpage" args)
> into
> 		(error "Can't find the %s manpage or no man(1)" args)

Yup, that'd be fine.




This bug report was last modified 15 years and 133 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.