GNU bug report logs -
#53464
[PATCH] doc: Add a rule of thumb to guide enabling new committers.
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 53464 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 53464 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#53464
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 23 Jan 2022 03:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 23 Jan 2022 03:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* doc/contributing.texi (Commit Access): Introduce a new rule of thumb to
determine if a contributor should be considered to become a committer.
---
doc/contributing.texi | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/contributing.texi b/doc/contributing.texi
index 9f97788c0b..321d496739 100644
--- a/doc/contributing.texi
+++ b/doc/contributing.texi
@@ -1386,9 +1386,14 @@ what your usertag means.
@cindex commit access, for developers
Everyone can contribute to Guix without having commit access
(@pxref{Submitting Patches}). However, for frequent contributors,
-having write access to the repository can be convenient. Commit access
-should not be thought of as a ``badge of honor'' but rather as a
-responsibility a contributor is willing to take to help the project.
+having write access to the repository can be convenient. As a rule of
+thumb, a contributor should have accumulated fifty (50) reviewed commits
+to be considered as a committer and have sustained their activity in the
+project for at least 6 months. This ensures enough interactions with
+the contributor, which is essential for mentoring and assessing whether
+they are ready to become a committer. Commit access should not be
+thought of as a ``badge of honor'' but rather as a responsibility a
+contributor is willing to take to help the project.
The following sections explain how to get commit access, how to be ready
to push commits, and the policies and community expectations for commits
--
2.34.0
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#53464
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Mon, 31 Jan 2022 22:47:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 53464 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello!
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> * doc/contributing.texi (Commit Access): Introduce a new rule of thumb to
> determine if a contributor should be considered to become a committer.
> ---
> doc/contributing.texi | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/contributing.texi b/doc/contributing.texi
> index 9f97788c0b..321d496739 100644
> --- a/doc/contributing.texi
> +++ b/doc/contributing.texi
> @@ -1386,9 +1386,14 @@ what your usertag means.
> @cindex commit access, for developers
> Everyone can contribute to Guix without having commit access
> (@pxref{Submitting Patches}). However, for frequent contributors,
> -having write access to the repository can be convenient. Commit access
> -should not be thought of as a ``badge of honor'' but rather as a
> -responsibility a contributor is willing to take to help the project.
> +having write access to the repository can be convenient. As a rule of
> +thumb, a contributor should have accumulated fifty (50) reviewed commits
> +to be considered as a committer and have sustained their activity in the
> +project for at least 6 months. This ensures enough interactions with
That sounds reasonable to me.
Thanks!
Ludo’.
Reply sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 01 Feb 2022 04:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 01 Feb 2022 04:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 53464-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi!
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Hello!
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> * doc/contributing.texi (Commit Access): Introduce a new rule of thumb to
>> determine if a contributor should be considered to become a committer.
>> ---
>> doc/contributing.texi | 11 ++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/contributing.texi b/doc/contributing.texi
>> index 9f97788c0b..321d496739 100644
>> --- a/doc/contributing.texi
>> +++ b/doc/contributing.texi
>> @@ -1386,9 +1386,14 @@ what your usertag means.
>> @cindex commit access, for developers
>> Everyone can contribute to Guix without having commit access
>> (@pxref{Submitting Patches}). However, for frequent contributors,
>> -having write access to the repository can be convenient. Commit access
>> -should not be thought of as a ``badge of honor'' but rather as a
>> -responsibility a contributor is willing to take to help the project.
>> +having write access to the repository can be convenient. As a rule of
>> +thumb, a contributor should have accumulated fifty (50) reviewed commits
>> +to be considered as a committer and have sustained their activity in the
>> +project for at least 6 months. This ensures enough interactions with
>
> That sounds reasonable to me.
Pushed as c1043fd60d273c61c80ecfd31fa3a4ea1b24639a.
Thank you for having a look!
Maxim
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 168 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.