GNU bug report logs - #53461
[kiasoc5@tutanota.com: Rust CVE]

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 00:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Merged with 54439, 56684

Done: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #32 received at 53461 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: kiasoc5 <at> tutanota.com, 53461 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#53461] [kiasoc5 <at> tutanota.com: Rust CVE]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 11:35:42 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
kiasoc5--- via Guix-patches via schreef op za 26-02-2022 om 07:07
[+0100]:
> +(define rust-1.59
> +  (rust-bootstrapped-package
> +   rust-1.58 "1.59.0"
> "1yc5bwcbmbwyvpfq7zvra78l0r8y3lbv60kbr62fzz2vx2pfxj57"))

Is building rust <at> 1.59 with rust <at> 1.58 necessary?  Can it be built
with an earlier rust instead?  I.e., would

(define rust-1.59 (rust-bootstrapped-package rust-1.57 "1.59.0" [...]))

or even

(define rust-1.59 
  (package
    (inherit rust-1.56)
    (source
      (origin
        (inherit (package-source rust-1.56))
        (uri (rust-uri version))
        (sha256 (base32 [...]))))))

work?

Greetings,
Maxime.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 343 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.