GNU bug report logs -
#53260
char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Lars Ingebrigtsen [2022-01-15 09:36:16] wrote:
> Mattias Engdegård <mattiase <at> acm.org> writes:
>> Fchar_syntax and the bytecode Bchar_syntax differ:
>> Fchar_syntax calls SETUP_BUFFER_SYNTAX_TABLE. Bchar_syntax does not.
>> Bchar_syntax converts arguments to multibyte. Fchar_syntax does not.
> [...]
>> And, most importantly, what would be the correct code?
> Hm. Perhaps Stefan has an opinion; added to the CCs.
My past opinion is in its docstring:
If you’re trying to determine the syntax of characters in the buffer,
this is probably the wrong function to use, because it can’t take
‘syntax-table’ text properties into account. Consider using
‘syntax-after’ instead.
The "can't" is because `char-syntax` doesn't know where the char comes from.
>> (I suppose char-syntax is rare enough that we could call Fchar_syntax
>> from Bchar_syntax and thus avoid any future divergence.)
> Used 172 times in-core, which isn't that rare...
I think he meant "rare" w.r.t dynamic count rather than static count.
Stefan
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 122 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.