Subject: bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 09:36:16 +0100

Mattias Engdegård <[email-masked]> writes:

> Fchar_syntax and the bytecode Bchar_syntax differ:
>
> Fchar_syntax calls SETUP_BUFFER_SYNTAX_TABLE. Bchar_syntax does not.
> Bchar_syntax converts arguments to multibyte. Fchar_syntax does not.

[...]

> And, most importantly, what would be the correct code?

Hm.  Perhaps Stefan has an opinion; added to the CCs.

> (I suppose char-syntax is rare enough that we could call Fchar_syntax
> from Bchar_syntax and thus avoid any future divergence.)

Used 172 times in-core, which isn't that rare...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no