Subject: Re: bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode [PATCH]

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:30:23 +0100

Mattias Engdegård <[email-masked]> writes:

> Sure, I'm happy to do it either way. Chars retrieved from unibyte
> buffers or strings really should be converted to multibyte before used
> with char-syntax; unibyte buffers are not very common but strings
> slightly more so.

Makes sense to me.  Unless Stefan has any further comments, please go
ahead and push.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no