GNU bug report logs - #53234
terminal URL capability not correctly detected (gnome-terminal 3.22.2).

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#53234: closed (Re: bug#53234: terminal URL capability not
 correctly detected (gnome-terminal 3.22.2).)
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 04:55:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#53234: terminal URL capability not correctly detected (gnome-terminal 3.22.2).

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 53234 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
53234: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53234
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 53234-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53234: terminal URL capability not correctly detected
 (gnome-terminal 3.22.2).
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 23:54:28 -0500

Hello!

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> I discovered that on a Debian 9 (stretch) box equipped with
>> gnome-terminal 3.22.2, Guix would use terminal ANSI codes to represent
>> hyperlinks in its output, which were not supported by GNOME terminal
>> 3.22.2 which uses VTE 0.46.1 (it picked up support in 3.26 IIRC).
>
> I’m afraid there’s not much we can do: terminal emulators are supposed
> to ignore ANSI sequences they don’t understand.

Ah, thanks for pointing that to me.  I had guessed we had to do some
work to detect the terminal capability and conditionally output escapes
or not, but I'm glad that's not how it works :-).

> My recollection is that there was a bug in libvte back then:
>
>   https://issues.guix.gnu.org/38940#6-lineno18
>
> That bug mentions a much older VTE though, so I wonder if it’s a newer
> regression?

According to [0]:

> At this moment, terminals known to be buggy (OSC 8 resulting in
> display corruption) are VTE versions up to 0.46.2 and 0.48.1, Windows
> Terminal up to 0.9, Emacs's built-in terminal, and screen with 700+
> character long URLs.

Which gnome-terminal shipped with Debian 9 uses.  Luckily, this release
will be EOL in a few months (June 2022) [1], so the problem will
disappear soon.

I'm closing this report, thank you for the explanations!

Maxim

[0]  https://gist.github.com/egmontkob/eb114294efbcd5adb1944c9f3cb5feda
[1]  https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: terminal URL capability not correctly detected (gnome-terminal
 3.22.2).
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:49:29 -0500

Hello,

I discovered that on a Debian 9 (stretch) box equipped with
gnome-terminal 3.22.2, Guix would use terminal ANSI codes to represent
hyperlinks in its output, which were not supported by GNOME terminal
3.22.2 which uses VTE 0.46.1 (it picked up support in 3.26 IIRC).

Thanks,

Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.