GNU bug report logs -
#53234
terminal URL capability not correctly detected (gnome-terminal 3.22.2).
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2022 23:54:28 -0500
with message-id <87sftpa9a3.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#53234: terminal URL capability not correctly detected (gnome-terminal 3.22.2).
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #53234,
regarding terminal URL capability not correctly detected (gnome-terminal 3.22.2).
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
53234: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53234
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello,
I discovered that on a Debian 9 (stretch) box equipped with
gnome-terminal 3.22.2, Guix would use terminal ANSI codes to represent
hyperlinks in its output, which were not supported by GNOME terminal
3.22.2 which uses VTE 0.46.1 (it picked up support in 3.26 IIRC).
Thanks,
Maxim
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello!
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> I discovered that on a Debian 9 (stretch) box equipped with
>> gnome-terminal 3.22.2, Guix would use terminal ANSI codes to represent
>> hyperlinks in its output, which were not supported by GNOME terminal
>> 3.22.2 which uses VTE 0.46.1 (it picked up support in 3.26 IIRC).
>
> I’m afraid there’s not much we can do: terminal emulators are supposed
> to ignore ANSI sequences they don’t understand.
Ah, thanks for pointing that to me. I had guessed we had to do some
work to detect the terminal capability and conditionally output escapes
or not, but I'm glad that's not how it works :-).
> My recollection is that there was a bug in libvte back then:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/38940#6-lineno18
>
> That bug mentions a much older VTE though, so I wonder if it’s a newer
> regression?
According to [0]:
> At this moment, terminals known to be buggy (OSC 8 resulting in
> display corruption) are VTE versions up to 0.46.2 and 0.48.1, Windows
> Terminal up to 0.9, Emacs's built-in terminal, and screen with 700+
> character long URLs.
Which gnome-terminal shipped with Debian 9 uses. Luckily, this release
will be EOL in a few months (June 2022) [1], so the problem will
disappear soon.
I'm closing this report, thank you for the explanations!
Maxim
[0] https://gist.github.com/egmontkob/eb114294efbcd5adb1944c9f3cb5feda
[1] https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 179 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.