From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 09 17:49:01 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2022 22:49:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51523 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6gzk-0006qZ-V7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 17:49:01 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55718) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6eDe-0000KB-TU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 14:51:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6eDe-0006cE-Lx for bug-parted@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 14:51:10 -0500 Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::52b] (port=38595 helo=mail-ed1-x52b.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6eDc-0003Se-MN for bug-parted@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 14:51:10 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id u21so22717593edd.5 for ; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 11:51:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LiUjfpPkwtRfDFScn59GeqJvLbcbM5h+jWgkrIXwsIw=; b=oWIijyDlL6ZfdWnzXuHSRF8lmg2BeiVTxDkxaBI/y8DJaMWqJDsb98AvaljyYWhJ90 YVsviAlw12Z7P1PaxAjczQCpWEgHbJ8Cu3bpwnrxtqSRPPPPxa1pHUQT87h7MUSvwoOG 1BRtdOjDseNHSo8IrdrwjZ4WGpAqSoetuJ7si/M9DoofLoldNiiJQM2keiOHVSihPOFT izv/W8Z5oXjVxPLBhCUhZ2ZLRGQusqItAPzpHwCTqjhG5i3VXfyc7p5BS4NYbsJYl4JG 4p8oLGoHHgtGHpyjnj7iSCT4ZqRhdCrwnlkCRpL1SePUx2uCiAa0G3RKqkqQi/BQqFv/ sUow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LiUjfpPkwtRfDFScn59GeqJvLbcbM5h+jWgkrIXwsIw=; b=714+BuUNG9B5JK/NoJVDYbReuamzRybQ/5DlI1LHQaTwZ1t6O9UD/NlRkpr0iXxchE LkkVO+9tYSorcRyGkauujsjdYSY2Jj8nGP3NM+vDOQPOC5K6YxEeXiZbTt3PKEYguO5b 8r2pLARmoWwrarAuJlNWuxHNjrFHJ+X8TTizLYfNFbrqrIvT0rMWU3uVVa/EXjwwJAYY mSL5mKMuqJhP+MvITpgZaN1ozoDlvhQvdqpZXm7j1p7J05tkb2TuO23OLKBa0OVM12VR 8NhJixAlWROmHXw5/GRCVaOIhVpgAFC9SHq46dRNXaTl32cesNDZQG+ROCjeGRWUna7Z iR3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532OXLBUtmHSWsQcmvklvaJMwDYXH4oqxlg3xubJ+1d4N4aj6SvN RCKX+K1GZgWbM5w5KmyJuHNm+5AJZtTrjjGY3tUwyCSTOKtaag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyU5I+nvhZzhit3b4ocLPjDJcNopqOIgsgURgftdMtKarGqeXKwv4xvXw8Kd4WXW8beOGOysOKwfbMelGUQUHI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3d88:: with SMTP id he8mr59500687ejc.239.1641757865950; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 11:51:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: AE x Lemur Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:50:55 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Bug: Overlapping Partitions To: bug-parted@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000068402905d52b8ad0" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::52b (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52b; envelope-from=lemur767trap@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x52b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 09 Jan 2022 17:49:00 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --00000000000068402905d52b8ad0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I think I found a bug in v3.4 of GNU Parted. This was my issue, put in removable media that had old Root and Home labelled partitions but they were mounted at /media/USER/xxxx. I wanted to format and i got an error about overlapping partitions. I used sfdisk to check my sectors start and end. I outputted the partition table data to a text file and edited the overlap as I did find one on /dev/sdb. I used sfdisk -d /dev/sdb > ~/Desktop/sdb-backup.txt After editing this text file to fix the overlap as my sdb1 end overlapped my sdb2 start, i re fed the new partition data back in with sfdisk /dev/sdb < ~/Desktop/sdb-backup.txt After being confident i fixed the overlap that was causing Parteds GUI to not open and the partitions were resized after feeding new adjusted data sectors to the disks with sfdisk, I got this print out when using a command: parted /dev/sdb unit s print to confirm the changes took place. My terminal spit this out *Backtrace has 14 calls on stack: 14: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x4f) [0x7f15143c3c8f] 13: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x2654c) [0x7f15143db54c] 12: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x136ba) [0x7f15143c86ba] 11: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_add_partition+0x1f0) [0x7f15143c8f90] 10: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x26f29) [0x7f15143dbf29] 9: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x270dd) [0x7f15143dc0dd] 8: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x26f54) [0x7f15143dbf54] 7: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x271cd) [0x7f15143dc1cd] 6: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_new+0x48) [0x7f15143c8a18] 5: parted(+0x8a1d) [0x55ae5016da1d] 4: parted(non_interactive_mode+0xb8) [0x55ae50173378] 3: parted(main+0x116d) [0x55ae5016bbdd] 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xcd) [0x7f151418b7ed] 1: parted(_start+0x2a) [0x55ae5016bd6a]You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checkingthe last version of GNU Parted that you can find at: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/ Please check this version prior to bug reporting.If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,please visit the GNU Parted website: http://www.gnu.org/software/parted for further information.Your report should contain the version of this release (3.4)along with the error message below, the output of parted DEVICE unit co print unit s printand the following history of commands you entered.Also include any additional information about your setup youconsider important.Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2359 in function add_logical_part_metadata() failed.zsh: IOT instruction sudo parted /dev/sdb print unit s print unit chs print* Please advise on how I fix this bug or review v3.4 files and patch the bug for future versions. Let me know if i was first to report this error in v3.4, not for reward but for personal pride and an ability to show off an email. Thanks Brandon Thomas --00000000000068402905d52b8ad0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think I found a bug in v3.4 of GNU Parted.

This was my issue, put in removable media that had old Roo= t and Home labelled partitions but they were mounted at /media/USER/xxxx.= =C2=A0 I wanted to format and i got an error about overlapping partitions.<= /div>

I used sfdisk to check my sectors start and end.

I outputted the partition table data to a text file= and edited the overlap as I did find one on /dev/sdb. I used sfdisk -d /de= v/sdb > ~/Desktop/sdb-backup.txt

After editing = this text file to fix the overlap as my sdb1 end overlapped my sdb2 start, = i re fed the new partition data back in with

sfdis= k /dev/sdb < ~/Desktop/sdb-backup.txt

After bei= ng confident i fixed the overlap that was causing Parteds GUI to not open a= nd the partitions were resized after feeding new adjusted data sectors to t= he disks with sfdisk,

I got this print out when us= ing a command: parted /dev/sdb unit s print=C2=A0 to confirm the changes to= ok place.=C2=A0 My terminal spit this out

Backtrace has 14 calls = on stack:
=C2=A0 14: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x4= f) [0x7f15143c3c8f]
=C2=A0 13: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x2= 654c) [0x7f15143db54c]
=C2=A0 12: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+= 0x136ba) [0x7f15143c86ba]
=C2=A0 11: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.= 2(ped_disk_add_partition+0x1f0) [0x7f15143c8f90]
=C2=A0 10: /lib/x86_64-= linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x26f29) [0x7f15143dbf29]
=C2=A0 9: /lib/x86_6= 4-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x270dd) [0x7f15143dc0dd]
=C2=A0 8: /lib/x86= _64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x26f54) [0x7f15143dbf54]
=C2=A0 7: /lib/x= 86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x271cd) [0x7f15143dc1cd]
=C2=A0 6: /lib= /x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_new+0x48) [0x7f15143c8a18]
=C2= =A0 5: parted(+0x8a1d) [0x55ae5016da1d]
=C2=A0 4: parted(non_interactive= _mode+0xb8) [0x55ae50173378]
=C2=A0 3: parted(main+0x116d) [0x55ae5016bb= dd]
=C2=A0 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xcd) [0= x7f151418b7ed]
=C2=A0 1: parted(_start+0x2a) [0x55ae5016bd6a]

You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:

Don&= #39;t panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
Help= us to fix this bug by doing the following:

Check whether the bug ha= s already been fixed by checking
the last version of GNU Parted that you= can find at:

http://ftp= .gnu.org/gnu/parted/

Please check this version prior to bug repo= rting.

If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how t= o check,
please visit the GNU Parted website:

http://www.gnu.org/software/parted

= for further information.

Your report should contain the version of t= his release (3.4)
along with the error message below, the output of
<= br> parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print

and the following histo= ry of commands you entered.
Also include any additional information abou= t your setup you
consider important.

Assertion (metadata_length &= gt; 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2359 in function add_logical_part= _metadata() failed.

zsh: IOT instruction =C2=A0sudo parted /dev/sdb = print unit s print unit chs print


Please advise on how I fix this bug or review v3.4 fi= les and patch the bug for future versions.
Let me know if i was first to report this error in v3.4, not for re= ward but for personal pride and an ability to show off an email.

= Thanks
Brandon Thomas=

--00000000000068402905d52b8ad0-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 10 17:23:38 2022 Received: (at 53151-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2022 22:23:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53469 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n734j-0003Wb-TX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:23:38 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:45972) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n734h-0003WS-1X for 53151-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:23:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1641853414; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=onc6pUlJdaQC/70FPn7S3H0dPcPJTq9L6CKKbEbwEEc=; b=jFtd5JDcJ3U3DPIhPEUgj4G5kWYIF/wCUbGMctXdD1bN+NS3GZ7Fjm6fRwGE1YUagQXO36 al86HYm6ZOa+IgBZmGvMI9hCMHEXDuvmG+1s4myPhrD+bo7OWtXCMySZH7DDDV++JuNKTe 4UcAjQgLhQgLP8NO16pa/anWSbWsFDU= Received: from mail-pl1-f197.google.com (mail-pl1-f197.google.com [209.85.214.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-133-x0goTW7_MPW_I5SOciCtnw-1; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:23:33 -0500 X-MC-Unique: x0goTW7_MPW_I5SOciCtnw-1 Received: by mail-pl1-f197.google.com with SMTP id p5-20020a170902bd0500b00148cb2d29ecso3302731pls.4 for <53151-close@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:23:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=onc6pUlJdaQC/70FPn7S3H0dPcPJTq9L6CKKbEbwEEc=; b=dn2taPUWLVWojMzABycdyO+AIVsU9eJORMzcGeMwbqGz4TF+mrURDYagDmqsGKNg2g kVF778tLu4w9B3PQ1KDu/HMVdwAV9MD1q4AAdUquL+Zs6i4HKf+SAwrzSNlLRMN+ZD2Y 7fE8ONH4TL+RqoJ+1zTfM8fuTGuhsR9F3gO9MhCvqvC4raSLMhGh1/qOeADk8a6BwrO9 iePJt8SoHGbvv+VgTENCLO3c9nOv/yBs5k+9IPtCXrL9NbsDga2n56esW79POX73VOxT BClxl6bf6f6YkrbfPi7hylq40TOBBCixn7s/5QGmOTbAPwQOr9o5v8PzbdRBd8Duhzoe i8NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hMYTOX1h9Rp0NNLk7PlXddBhgUghYe+cE5BplnSk3CRwMuFEd EEtJAePAaDGsyvNF7A4TXojtY7jhPQ7i8L6KulyQiJSJKs8Rjj+hhIm5vDqJMsok7Z+ls5zvcpP JfqqPoqAzFrfn64ylE/oKX2+kXoaNNGKZChLNFPioCgvDphCGG2CWuSVX43DPjolF7jRg X-Received: by 2002:a63:e343:: with SMTP id o3mr1529573pgj.543.1641853411915; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:23:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwcdEtLpvbFXm8+rSA7MFhufXoCGqeIe4UwSUTfXIhBVKqjGu4dMgooNUX57FVjEISl5UR1KA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e343:: with SMTP id o3mr1529555pgj.543.1641853411523; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:23:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ohop.brianlane.com ([2601:603:5000:3e9:52e5:49ff:fe52:c5be]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y14sm7966203pfi.178.2022.01.10.14.23.30 for <53151-close@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:23:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:23:29 -0800 From: "Brian C. Lane" To: 53151-close@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#53151: Bug: Overlapping Partitions Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=bcl@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53151-close X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 02:50:55PM -0500, AE x Lemur wrote: > I think I found a bug in v3.4 of GNU Parted. > > This was my issue, put in removable media that had old Root and Home > labelled partitions but they were mounted at /media/USER/xxxx. I wanted to > format and i got an error about overlapping partitions. > > I used sfdisk to check my sectors start and end. > > I outputted the partition table data to a text file and edited the overlap > as I did find one on /dev/sdb. I used sfdisk -d /dev/sdb > > ~/Desktop/sdb-backup.txt > > After editing this text file to fix the overlap as my sdb1 end overlapped > my sdb2 start, i re fed the new partition data back in with > > sfdisk /dev/sdb < ~/Desktop/sdb-backup.txt > > After being confident i fixed the overlap that was causing Parteds GUI to > not open and the partitions were resized after feeding new adjusted data > sectors to the disks with sfdisk, > > I got this print out when using a command: parted /dev/sdb unit s print to > confirm the changes took place. My terminal spit this out That means that whatever (not parted) created that extended partition that they didn't leave the required space before the first logical partition. There's nothing that parted can do about that. Although given how often this seems to come up I may look at adding an actual error output instead of using the assert. Brian -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 11 10:59:30 2022 Received: (at 53151) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2022 15:59:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n7JYX-000278-Qs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:59:30 -0500 Received: from mail-oo1-f49.google.com ([209.85.161.49]:33430) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n7JYU-00026p-Sp; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:59:28 -0500 Received: by mail-oo1-f49.google.com with SMTP id z4-20020a4a6544000000b002dcc183d269so1430545oog.0; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 07:59:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gRA7b0sa9jUz/NpjWEktjRgjbBbaWGpxWXuESTBeYLE=; b=LfaGDJIGHXxXV6pBBqRsZgtFYM90Qgs7h+swsLMxaidxbQBC4Ah7vRSF+5K+Sj0l/F AGRiX1HdH7Yr+TEk3q/6lLiKDE2e6jQl6SNtN6B0BJOzQ/j8/Y7265rwKowS6NRjcpFz PEs8yKIAu5LGEg3ERqdTWuuFNWR1DNBCiBmsWsZJfE+9Xn1zvZSHtiG+4z0vQURAh6s1 XmXF6k8YKUwhYEgjbjv1bPRGU9me2jaNS715/zkDifZwB4GGva+BgpmM04VMGSpCGWvy l0e0538uE+ckUlC2cS1prFRwS3fzf8no7iQBTILNz3p1054azGa1K1kmHawf8i/td44m 3d5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gRA7b0sa9jUz/NpjWEktjRgjbBbaWGpxWXuESTBeYLE=; b=YDI4UUVmLyRMAh3vZ2XN/fZnXuZPHlSNeeZhblt+GUACIIQADHf6eu8auT/hxIStPX OJyi5wRgq4dyTxG898cH448R6ju5HKl2ROImU2KyblduANaEZsvtDcHieUgRfgN0kAE+ dqHkvWkEnzrs/PMMrKz9lmH0PtQ+xC/7tM0Ex4qNYqsT2N/6yqRhqg7hCVRaMI783+Zr ml/+fpllnryp4vCtLdSwKyBxPX0N8BiEay+RpAMM0kbmEX1GbvXK9XPnm0pL+fZFA5cL 7ogysE6K7OPt3C759OrdJM2u4u3/NFXb0tZv5BpnR9AkyyDdtMuT9zGh5BRKkyClnTpz FNNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mRKZvdtNLi4Rx6xGt/MEUNLbEkiQHjSZQ1U8pXCS0k5AI4Gd+ LBTjnChHwgcwqgcmLPuCI+l37qZKIroCr95AuPboSjdEV1M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXF81DDCJfbLH2qAumpdZwaK3bejhkHf6BoZGoFHVD9kbOE2WujJoXntG6PaMTjw6bTo74csYDBiHrDVYoO0E= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:c983:: with SMTP id u3mr3538569ooq.66.1641916760969; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 07:59:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?SMOla29uIEzDuHZkYWw=?= Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 16:59:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#53151: Bug: Overlapping Partitions To: 53151@debbugs.gnu.org, "Brian C. Lane" , lemur767trap@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53151 Cc: 53151-close@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 23:24, Brian C. Lane wrote: > Although given how often this seems to come up I may look at adding an > actual error output instead of using the assert. Yes, please do. From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:13:47 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator