GNU bug report logs - #53142
cuirass: useless guile backtraces.

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:58:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#53142: closed (Re: bug#53142: cuirass: useless guile backtraces.)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 09:47:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#53142: cuirass: useless guile backtraces.

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 53142 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
53142: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53142
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Cc: 53142-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53142: cuirass: useless guile backtraces.
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:46:07 +0100
Hey,

> Let's see if the backtraces are now more interesting to read.

Found the issue and fixed it with:
07a419e34a31c017c69ec31243c12aa858e2f15f.

Thanks,

Mathieu

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: cuirass: useless guile backtraces.
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2022 16:57:01 +0100
Hello,

On berlin, the cuirass-remote-server process experiences some crashes:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
64324951:In ice-9/eval.scm:
64324952-    619:8  2 (_ #(#(#<directory (cuirass scripts remote-server) ?> ?)))
64324953-    619:8  1 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (cuirass scr?> ?)) ?) ?) ?) ?))
64324954-2022-01-09T11:03:14 debug: 141.80.167.181 (BxlgA2Wd): no available build.
64324955:In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
64324956-  1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
64324957-2022-01-09T11:03:14 debug: 141.80.167.180 (R0kGMoI8): request work.
64324958:ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
64324959:In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting struct): #f
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

and,

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
64325600:In ice-9/eval.scm:
64325601-    619:8  2 (_ #(#(#<directory (cuirass scripts remote-server) ?> ?)))
64325602-    619:8  1 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (cuirass scr?> ?)) ?) ?) ?) ?))
64325603:In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
64325604-  1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
64325605-2022-01-09T11:03:44 debug: 141.80.167.161 (gnijzoxQ): no available build.
64325606:ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
64325607:In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting struct): #f
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Any idea how to make those backtraces more helpful?

Thanks,

Mathieu



This bug report was last modified 3 years and 123 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.