GNU bug report logs - #53132
gnu: Add newaita-reborn-icon-theme

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 53132 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Disseminate Dissent <disseminatedissent <at> protonmail.com>
Subject: [bug#53132] gnu: Add newaita-reborn-icon-theme
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2022 17:52:16 +0100

Am Sonntag, dem 09.01.2022 um 16:27 +0100 schrieb Tobias Geerinckx-
Rice:
> Liliana Marie Prikler 写道：
> > There's no reason to set up an icons file.
> 
> I think there is.  Putting GNOME extensions in gnome-xyz makes 
> sense, along with GNOME-specific themes.  These icon themes are 
> neither.
While not necessarily GNOME-specific, I'd still say icon packs
primarily target a GNOME or KDE audience, with Guix traditionally
shipping more of the GNOME-adjacent ones.  The name "newaita" also
sounds much like Adwaita, which as we all know is the default icon
theme for GNOME.

We currently have the following icon themes:
> name: lxde-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/lxde.scm:434:2
> 
> name: tango-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2882:2
> 
> name: papirus-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm:185:2
> 
> name: moka-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm:161:2
> 
> name: mate-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/mate.scm:136:2
> 
> name: mate-icon-theme-faenza
> location: gnu/packages/mate.scm:157:2
> 
> name: hicolor-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3018:2
> 
> name: gnome-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2835:2
> 
> name: faba-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm:130:2
> 
> name: elementary-xfce-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/xfce.scm:269:2
> 
> name: delft-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm:97:2
> 
> name: arc-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm:63:2
> 
> name: adwaita-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2863:2

Would you suggest collecting them all in a single file?  Can that even
be done (particularly the mate one looks sus in terms of dependencies)?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.