Subject: [bug#53132] gnu: Add newaita-reborn-icon-theme

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2022 17:52:16 +0100

Am Sonntag, dem 09.01.2022 um 16:27 +0100 schrieb Tobias Geerinckx-
Rice:
> Liliana Marie Prikler 写道：
> > There's no reason to set up an icons file.
> 
> I think there is.  Putting GNOME extensions in gnome-xyz makes 
> sense, along with GNOME-specific themes.  These icon themes are 
> neither.
While not necessarily GNOME-specific, I'd still say icon packs
primarily target a GNOME or KDE audience, with Guix traditionally
shipping more of the GNOME-adjacent ones.  The name "newaita" also
sounds much like Adwaita, which as we all know is the default icon
theme for GNOME.

We currently have the following icon themes:
> name: lxde-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/lxde.scm:434:2
> 
> name: tango-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2882:2
> 
> name: papirus-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm:185:2
> 
> name: moka-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm:161:2
> 
> name: mate-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/mate.scm:136:2
> 
> name: mate-icon-theme-faenza
> location: gnu/packages/mate.scm:157:2
> 
> name: hicolor-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3018:2
> 
> name: gnome-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2835:2
> 
> name: faba-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm:130:2
> 
> name: elementary-xfce-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/xfce.scm:269:2
> 
> name: delft-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm:97:2
> 
> name: arc-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome-xyz.scm:63:2
> 
> name: adwaita-icon-theme
> location: gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2863:2

Would you suggest collecting them all in a single file?  Can that even
be done (particularly the mate one looks sus in terms of dependencies)?