From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:03:00 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#53067 <53067@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#53067 <53067@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: NonGNU ELPA: Packages removed from elpa-packages still on archive Reply-To: bug#53067 <53067@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:03:00 +0000 retitle 53067 NonGNU ELPA: Packages removed from elpa-packages still on arc= hive reassign 53067 emacs submitter 53067 Stefan Kangas severity 53067 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 07 03:31:41 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2022 08:31:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n5kez-0001AC-KO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 03:31:41 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n5kew-00019v-Mt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 03:31:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5kew-0008NQ-FD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 03:31:38 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181]:35594) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5ker-0001V0-Om for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 03:31:38 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f181.google.com with SMTP id n16so4409076plc.2 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:31:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YPobSh2HFVqmmvyv6GUbjaex/ngjmA00EuXW/TnUyts=; b=tEgnNJOgXHCGj+c6KIFJqesHLpaRw/0tGqdRh4lPkYnULHq/lcNA8kgbgJSWxiQ4fJ ZIB4pyodGE0XeZyZaFqj4y2CNV9qbRGpwAdbfiprdC0XVz65RKn7iL4U5BxIsditGOLr mCwBBc/YS0hXGAGtCJzTqYuOLzq/2xFWxxRA0/B0/0ts85letpSkUq+cLumJWWbzqOxB aUbS2sXjarKWnySpDUQrMEDDtXa65/wEX0AMrN7lYvIlij7mGw3KOZTcaddwxOhDbEnk gM5n8UR1rjv/9IBv3tvxUVg6Jjvr0pMWXOZSYFrJXtXar0G6RxShbECg90Fn1AR1V0/E Rehw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339cnEHbSidMZJXoBmShdd15KizUGRIa9cq40l3nsugDftpchWY XGECd+/7P4jpMWs2y3kLhXnChzM2o25/o4n7tvRL9HluVt8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxIanxbFLceEvk1PgsG8TDSOQLgLQNlUIMmvdTyRrPDsAcR/W95kWPFsZ4b0XOq5xbAvVFeokEg9JiI9pFQAU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b798:: with SMTP id m24mr1078184pjr.143.1641544285540; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 02:31:25 -0600 From: Stefan Kangas X-Debbugs-CC: Stefan Monnier , Philip Kaludercic MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 02:31:25 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: NonGNU ELPA: Packages removed from elpa-packages still on archive To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.181; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-f181.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) In this commit, a package was removed: commit 340e98ee8d52185c8c65f0ce59bb61d5a188a9f4 Author: Philip Kaludercic Date: Fri Oct 22 19:20:45 2021 +0200 * elpa-packages (color-theme-tangotango): Remove package However, it still is available for download: https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu/color-theme-tangotango.html Should we remove packages automatically if they are not listed in elpa-packages? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 09 20:33:21 2022 Received: (at 53067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2022 01:33:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6jYn-0004RX-Ig for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 20:33:21 -0500 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:4297) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6jYl-0004RL-IG for 53067@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2022 20:33:20 -0500 Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 19D08803FC; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 20:33:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7FEF480539; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 20:33:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1641778392; bh=hZfF+7xLuwIX9OnmaIrk062IuVAJnepb0ssmcB67YTg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=CYcxbjoLslu4BhMEbCniAn6V8pVK5yCf7v/jz2m9h4XCoxx1rI1f+vjBCr99+k7YX vbXUL949y6aYHczQkBfmgft8UWQYbCPanRTelXmcIvCmnMqItb9ZCP17seo655qgv5 Q/fNdH2e1L5KU70xQuz/6s2xPKTTJ2bO1Zqysc2nz6hrzkXpt5rwFPUBPzf6UG4Z2F 24WykqpVTDWMarQ4F5P3lOxoT3umFTPwoWpy6ZtzgxARbnJv5idDQ/BF4FUvB2y/tT DlMNoLOMI3xGYNvl6WsyC6CWTE1/7XUXFFZOEoBiTD2OU3nQYScCWN56yPp7aM5mi6 hOqRrFzn9u7sA== Received: from ceviche (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 514EE12046B; Sun, 9 Jan 2022 20:33:12 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#53067: NonGNU ELPA: Packages removed from elpa-packages still on archive Message-ID: References: Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2022 20:33:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 7 Jan 2022 02:31:25 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL 0.150 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53067 Cc: Philip Kaludercic , 53067@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Kangas [2022-01-07 02:31:25] wrote: > In this commit, a package was removed: > commit 340e98ee8d52185c8c65f0ce59bb61d5a188a9f4 > Author: Philip Kaludercic > Date: Fri Oct 22 19:20:45 2021 +0200 > * elpa-packages (color-theme-tangotango): Remove package > However, it still is available for download: > https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu/color-theme-tangotango.html > Should we remove packages automatically if they are not listed in > elpa-packages? Good question. The current scripts don't, obviously, but that's just a side effect of the way they work. Whether we remove them from `archive-contents` or not, I think it's important to keep their `.html` page, who updated with a note explaining that it's been removed. Stefan