GNU bug report logs - #53024
29.0.50; Wishlist: Byte-compile loaddefs.el?

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>
Cc: 53024 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#53024: 29.0.50; Wishlist: Byte-compile loaddefs.el?
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 20:10:09 +0300

> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: 53024 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  'Eli Zaretskii' <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
>   monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:31:16 +0200
> 
> Error: void-function (display-warning)
>   mapbacktrace(#[1028 "\1\4\203\24\0\301\302!\210\300\4!\210\301\303!\210\202\35\0\301\304!\210\3\3B\262\1\211\2035\0\300\1@!\210\211A\211\262\2\2035\0\301\305!\210\202!\0\301\306!\207" [prin1 princ "  " "(" "  (" " " ")\n"] 7 "\n\n(fn EVALD FUNC ARGS FLAGS)"])
>   debug-early-backtrace()
>   debug-early(error (void-function display-warning))
>   display-warning(comp "Cannot look up eln file as no source file was found for /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/emacs-29.0.50/lisp/loaddefs.elc")
>   load("loaddefs")

Is this consistent?  That is, if you repeat the "make" command after
the failure, does it succeed to continue past this point?  If it does
not, is it true that lisp/loaddefs.el is not there?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.