GNU bug report logs -
#53004
NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive
Previous Next
Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:11:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 5 Jan 2022 08:54:48 -0800
with message-id <CADwFkmn_=3c2Zc2=trttMzW0iCaq6Lg+C551mmZJARN=916ONg <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#53004: NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #53004,
regarding NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
53004: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53004
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
In elpa-packages, we have:
("paredit" :url "https://mumble.net/~campbell/git/paredit.git"
:ignored-files ("check.sh" "genhtml.sh" "test.el"))
But I can't find it on:
http://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu/
However, it is available here:
https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu-devel/
I guess this has to do with the version number, which is "25beta". I'm
not sure why it is a beta, as I've been using it for 10+ years with no
issues whatsoever.
Perhaps we should gently ask the developer to bump it to some non-beta
version number, or alternatively accept that as a full release in this
case?
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name> writes:
> I was in touch with upstream recently about a bug. I think that 25
> might be forthcoming. So perhaps wait and see a bit?
I think I've misunderstood the development model. Basically, it is
briefly changed from e.g. version 25-beta to version 25 when it is
released, and then it is changed to 26-beta. So if you're running from
current master, it will always be such a "beta" version.
In this case, we could tag up an old commit and build a package from
that, but I don't think it's worth it. Let's just wait for version 26.
I'm therefore closing this bug report.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 233 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.