From unknown Tue Sep 23 10:39:49 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#53004 <53004@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#53004 <53004@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive Reply-To: bug#53004 <53004@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 17:39:49 +0000 retitle 53004 NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive reassign 53004 emacs submitter 53004 Stefan Kangas severity 53004 minor thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 04 09:10:26 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2022 14:10:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37163 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4kWA-000286-5p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 09:10:26 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:37678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4kW7-00027x-NL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 09:10:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4kW7-0002vn-IE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 09:10:23 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]:38885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4kVw-0000Wa-Hn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 09:10:21 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id l10-20020a17090a384a00b001b22190e075so35776134pjf.3 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 06:10:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Rg9no+dn/UefzmGyoGAPg8LoBRYzOO8qrAeTYxQtSGo=; b=PXZyQan0u1yTTkUAKUPqiATn4Gm+BwBzVGn55NSp9pHBVWHDHydbvCaNOfaDCOFjyx ze304HTyNRAlk4t07WsyOdQquxh0hEjXYG/UJM+VDkwM3qgxIu1n2PTOTYsiume3pXpq /FySQ3s4wvlXV48PNbwY4J+j/9+Gobc2vmSWDzFGmjZ6Iix1iVGQLYKkqdsRP4gIRNgy u7MaO0sOK9W7Xnpu7sTDB251tPNQj6FeuYXCJqVnImkUTN1LsuirvBSjeyP+3E5xSWc2 oQUYS3TBdWq/BSSAGN5vYbJJrFaMll+NzTjVj6H8u68SP/Gk+xpZ+WyPuoqjWZ4eg3H/ ciOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533MWkvmXJPoZCHzzVmkURdQd9HTIWe0oGGeueVf7mC8zd1m1ePO 5wgASolANdndAWxogpGV3//1IL4vAHhzWr1QQL6POySe X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmCfwXfhv2pyEkzy/a+1T+FzGc6NcJSjG9PDFZXEQbMAi1Qwpk1rveetAQKzb+4IIFM7GaXGSptKh4VigqAzM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1646:: with SMTP id il6mr60626348pjb.143.1641305406365; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 06:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 09:10:05 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 09:10:05 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.48; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-f48.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) In elpa-packages, we have: ("paredit" :url "https://mumble.net/~campbell/git/paredit.git" :ignored-files ("check.sh" "genhtml.sh" "test.el")) But I can't find it on: http://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu/ However, it is available here: https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu-devel/ I guess this has to do with the version number, which is "25beta". I'm not sure why it is a beta, as I've been using it for 10+ years with no issues whatsoever. Perhaps we should gently ask the developer to bump it to some non-beta version number, or alternatively accept that as a full release in this case? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 04 14:30:27 2022 Received: (at 53004) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2022 19:30:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38754 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4pVm-0004yd-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:30:27 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:59131) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4pVj-0004yO-Fw for 53004@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:30:21 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352D55C020B; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:30:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:30:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=LcBehGoyYdrwLY9YEHKnRPxs9G TZ2Uy2LGdDwTm+MXo=; b=lK8z8YEky+/Tm8ndLcwa7jemdjL00eRdcnTsVW2mjh uBRCKMgYHPexrKmMBmv5QKW7N4KrdGWEGdN1wXNy/51biofu7tfCuB3IxTPP1S3i 2InPBmFFpNfO+sz0STo+JJESigoRRKafEMJ8nom2axkgXd+7MlmiD8IToQ0EYorN 0HtEAVKSa+DZlwrjwSQO/HHXSL+t+N9ATigaUdeZbZaQJt2s/kzYO3l54NX1FWS/ dAK8SP0w0o/P++D9TIeplb869ke+eA0O7kZ0T6jdk4r1FS3UdBwGnWnl61Vh4fdw 65ngZJ+C8o3wSs+OEZhQVSlwJWWrMk0wl79pa6CjqrnA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LcBehG oyYdrwLY9YEHKnRPxs9GTZ2Uy2LGdDwTm+MXo=; b=Rz654F2KcKEJYv5F9+XZ3A J4dVtRXt12CIqoSfORRF0IFELO1rnaLDt5uVJPyQeBxKUkZosUvEsvVyGbm6B1Lo jPFG9QDKDld+/W3ZjmMgWzcrakY6O0RVgEpAVQOxqlksEny9BDzgQozrSyqww53T edaYpIg904kyEFVw+537jQeHiIZJDFntq/lJ0k6RXLTnSWyhkPNKScy/CHOISUoH JuaB3YuPSGzVyHkAM6vi/qTD6ljmBLCn4HxaXiGaz6mqBnjCs3mHlyqfj8ibYDaX MsHkGv+AidZau1YWTM0lRYbjBSYjXKTVcfXtPXV/jj1iRgJqZlDCe3iAda+pbZ4Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudeffedguddviecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffujghffgffkfggtgesthdttddttdertdenucfhrhhomhepufgvrghn ucghhhhithhtohhnuceoshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgvqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvieelffffgeelfeekveelfeelhffgffffledvhfekteeu tdelvddvffejtdekteenucffohhmrghinhepmhhumhgslhgvrdhnvghtpdhnohhnghhnuh drohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:30:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF3B97F954E; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 12:30:12 -0700 (MST) From: Sean Whitton To: Stefan Kangas , 53004@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#53004: NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.31.4 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 12:30:12 -0700 Message-ID: <87k0ffuwmz.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53004 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hello Stefan, On Tue 04 Jan 2022 at 09:10AM -05, Stefan Kangas wrote: > In elpa-packages, we have: > > ("paredit" :url "https://mumble.net/~campbell/git/paredit.git" > :ignored-files ("check.sh" "genhtml.sh" "test.el")) > > But I can't find it on: > > http://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu/ > > However, it is available here: > > https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu-devel/ > > I guess this has to do with the version number, which is "25beta". I'm > not sure why it is a beta, as I've been using it for 10+ years with no > issues whatsoever. > > Perhaps we should gently ask the developer to bump it to some non-beta > version number, or alternatively accept that as a full release in this > case? I was in touch with upstream recently about a bug. I think that 25 might be forthcoming. So perhaps wait and see a bit? -- Sean Whitton From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 05 11:54:36 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2022 16:54:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41628 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n59Ya-0003Jr-HD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 11:54:36 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com ([209.85.216.51]:38743) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n59YY-0003Jc-4w for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 11:54:34 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id l10-20020a17090a384a00b001b22190e075so4929819pjf.3 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 08:54:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YTZ6N5JpH/IudX6ORqpuNBBjMeCyD/05JQ33tbRVNQo=; b=jlrZTeiOpseYfceNkoFRU8V2j/MRZAUFYGPlwoOaks5kWzeL/EMbGnnV+U5/gHq0PN 7KWblmCwO4hQsdnMc4o8Jqk/vOZ/ZClBOlSRreEuUpEkZv/+Q3rpMt17s4ULkxgXDX/X E5n2zsCH+b7Hb1NU/DyKaKmASMc+n935S7yJy3fqpu2nVJTKe9wePdXkMKCpod6kK7BR 8+d4RZ8KBu4U+XDutNl/nTbvkcAPjUaHcPyi7zv8owHCJCxKqjN5QTWBalCpxnRhNJZf S8DOaZttT+ko6HhpNT8YPCOxq0apwGxQ8EHBIAN57tqxWBuJi5zTCKSKiywMEwE+dNZt NcZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533EXgflvT+5J9N/rvHgE/YplZLaiSnWmT7KZnzmZLiYv2eUMUQn 21CfbA9Oz6gVpR/48LSL/Oj6ZCQX/UFZrxpWRY86DLfX X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMEAWoeJ8MX5+3Lg66DfTwGNM/dzDN+faFqly0AtyWWJX2nwAR9YpxBdwn679bQLMjaIdOOgWnWLDLTZumUeM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7615:b0:148:db50:6b9f with SMTP id k21-20020a170902761500b00148db506b9fmr53588027pll.102.1641401668075; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 08:54:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 08:54:27 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 08:54:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: control message for bug #53004 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) severity 53004 minor quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 05 11:54:55 2022 Received: (at 53004-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2022 16:54:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n59Yt-0003KQ-Mf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 11:54:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f176.google.com ([209.85.210.176]:40696) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n59Ys-0003KC-C1 for 53004-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 11:54:54 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f176.google.com with SMTP id q3so31383316pfs.7 for <53004-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 08:54:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LCtBd4DWR4WBCgMnnFfCOpg6XdGl57JOopKuKwHXcWY=; b=MdTg8bfPcO/IWcmifjL9zT01vzP72KYR9KtNPiGvS5yWCJi6hgxFulIj9p7GTLJbUm GwwQ/Pp8F7wXsLQVEILIj+9y6Kz1AKzQSX1+lwg/MH7+dLZtNdL8/ZVzc4f3ZUoVb28p cp8/rBzJ+ZSs8p+XfovTzWffInsd5nmQdbMVi0A1nJ+UksbnzUUEKgsglBujlhxI8rBk hBpgF5Xp2EgxfLKJRxREI7JCtFcMyum726haKEix8O+bghBbVQFKyR/2O0ZyGdnc9q2I 1EMSEfx0ZKAnAWAtC55s+Z8mGTmVKrDABL0tDFZWmpNL70zDLdfsZcLGiJsvu7kD9fmq gowQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531B3O631QYGFT/lfT67QnA+NtLyUJYHTPZgn3akQNouAFcc7MPM ulUCTgvup6bY9wpYveDPR6/UPT+fQFhjVNpi/xExPBah X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgQjL7VGdH8kGC8C0+Wqv9I9ov0cbNK/JRpHnrKyv8pm/3QHChdQ0z6JiC4PqrxsD12NOyG1amhkKr13i6X/U= X-Received: by 2002:a62:7745:0:b0:4ba:7251:d559 with SMTP id s66-20020a627745000000b004ba7251d559mr56253927pfc.35.1641401688602; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 08:54:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 08:54:48 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87k0ffuwmz.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> (Sean Whitton's message of "Tue, 04 Jan 2022 12:30:12 -0700") References: <87k0ffuwmz.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 08:54:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#53004: NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive To: Sean Whitton Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53004-done Cc: 53004-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Sean Whitton writes: > I was in touch with upstream recently about a bug. I think that 25 > might be forthcoming. So perhaps wait and see a bit? I think I've misunderstood the development model. Basically, it is briefly changed from e.g. version 25-beta to version 25 when it is released, and then it is changed to 26-beta. So if you're running from current master, it will always be such a "beta" version. In this case, we could tag up an old commit and build a package from that, but I don't think it's worth it. Let's just wait for version 26. I'm therefore closing this bug report. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 06 01:40:55 2022 Received: (at 53004) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2022 06:40:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39494 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n5MSF-0005Ft-Eb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 01:40:55 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:36591) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n5MSE-0005Fh-3J for 53004@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 01:40:54 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE56E5C00FF; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 01:40:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 06 Jan 2022 01:40:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=CPRlPNXU1xTMnuD3WRCPyED7oR V+JhHWuZGJNd/uCw8=; b=wD8O5sPQR9O7cJuF6JXrM+aLnA5z3u9qSAd0t0ued5 iyqBTX2XAAcIM+nbCNPVf+A+QPkpR4TOYa2h2S84vmkCLbq3iZ9kL3z9drQs5yc5 G2twJnBchi9E6h3QWROQ5MBMLOEc4n7fr3ZoVSFi20oJrS6VuQNcs9abin2vyAU9 5m1TgchrZW7yYRdlvzvZDOdO+6NoQQl9LksnLMT9UlfnfkcaDqaOFnOhJH0Y8nwD eq/aiRY7vIvDTl4JZgSJpX/uoSVoC3hd6hKP6Ky2ttmh9s02pg8BMPfpG6/GvdzS YG/RlyFTd9W7lgeBiKaz3J9VMRs6AqyYp8hHaexWuqyg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=CPRlPN XU1xTMnuD3WRCPyED7oRV+JhHWuZGJNd/uCw8=; b=WB1EqiPXug/C5rbkYYz1Mr wsJtd/pAm6RjG2mrZIVJNB5PS27cnFOswe+zyCljTs9iFbvxM4OQcR+znXTr9WDN /itg/0wirNOHOJsfyr4ni37sUvCr8yNLdMazk60dPaAFMvNOJ4ee0xa8cx/CU/is Sn4oXzCvyxVh/kj7DeJWjGX5yo3gmvHiFEVqZTesEYT5ARRUp0RBic+8BbxSwiCW rmltbnmz/4SNPc70we/CCiondSRgyUa6lM78p2Hfj8rhuXvNsuRT+xjEqW9RSrff EGHNwO8U9cmUAma0i1sAS+rHKKftDWpykYdiHPh3yzVI12viVV4WDpEaK/pukiYw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudefkedgudejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhgffffkgggtsehttddttddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefuvggrnhcu hghhihhtthhonhcuoehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgeqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleeggefgvdeijedvhfdugfegtefgkeekueeileejjeehudeg geefteeghfeuffeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 01:40:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by athena.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C3D5F1B98B8; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 06:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Sean Whitton To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#53004: NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive In-Reply-To: References: <87k0ffuwmz.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.31.4 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2022 23:40:47 -0700 Message-ID: <87a6g92wpc.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53004 Cc: 53004@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Wed 05 Jan 2022 at 08:54am -08, Stefan Kangas wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >> I was in touch with upstream recently about a bug. I think that 25 >> might be forthcoming. So perhaps wait and see a bit? > > I think I've misunderstood the development model. Basically, it is > briefly changed from e.g. version 25-beta to version 25 when it is > released, and then it is changed to 26-beta. So if you're running from > current master, it will always be such a "beta" version. > > In this case, we could tag up an old commit and build a package from > that, but I don't think it's worth it. Let's just wait for version 26. Just to confirm, you meant version 25, right? -- Sean Whitton From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 06 03:05:21 2022 Received: (at 53004) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2022 08:05:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39558 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n5Nlx-0007Nx-J4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 03:05:21 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]:36575) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n5Nlv-0007Ni-4s for 53004@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 03:05:19 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f42.google.com with SMTP id c9-20020a17090a1d0900b001b2b54bd6c5so7601197pjd.1 for <53004@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:05:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Xfxoy9F4FdES9eiH5V5G4boVphCHHvhmDTGIONR6cxs=; b=As/+Z+cBjsnA3u7y0VsDZV6TnXd1BwkxeBTv0nP0Espdhvr61ji0JDQZIOynmui0Pw gdvgJu2x4oEV3Q/K069byxWO11MPt4U+k6QwcDv4wLvyVJKuPXzpbQgLgaMiS7fTmKlo BjY1BpgEkQGEi1CnO9g5eeVflrzE19IOxVWRgaHbcJ89huSP6n/XSfx2QYxElN/poJRe VRyPh09Gkgzw7af2t/XcThEVvNXqcyegC4R+n/AHPClvveO6zJ7c4v+NR5wg1UyUudiG S0zqso5LN9lKBCMRvFAqbBcJEUqS/e62TdixD6+11cQYJwoQBhd42CYdBeBI4JSha75t 0FGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tO6Z8eGWzaP1DFHtcysbUNbBzdxNUWps9E7/X/EZxpyspskyl biunTXfk2DuWyG3ijpmktzRW43YuOk7TxMJxNLw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxREk5rGG31KPJv9dGjUHjcOu9iMfPmqc2kQczTG5Au4M0SuYo5hQwuDbHwqkBYTVQAmx4JjtvXVl+wBARsmMA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bc4c:b0:149:ed05:3027 with SMTP id t12-20020a170902bc4c00b00149ed053027mr2460732plz.174.1641456313348; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:05:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 00:05:12 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87a6g92wpc.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> References: <87k0ffuwmz.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87a6g92wpc.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 00:05:12 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#53004: NonGNU ELPA: paredit only available in -devel archive To: Sean Whitton Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 53004 Cc: 53004@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Sean Whitton writes: >> In this case, we could tag up an old commit and build a package from >> that, but I don't think it's worth it. Let's just wait for version 26. > > Just to confirm, you meant version 25, right? Yes, that was a typo. From unknown Tue Sep 23 10:39:49 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator