From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:18:01 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#52981 <52981@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#52981 <52981@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install Reply-To: bug#52981 <52981@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 12:18:01 +0000 retitle 52981 Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install reassign 52981 guix submitter 52981 Erik Winkels severity 52981 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 03 12:11:45 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 17:11:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36091 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Qs4-0001f6-8J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 12:11:45 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QCD-0000Nz-Sk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:28:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QCD-0000j9-Nl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:28:29 -0500 Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.28]:52011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QC9-0000YE-Q5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:28:28 -0500 Received: from ox-appsuite3.xs4all.net ([194.109.29.136]) by smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net with ESMTPSA id 4QC1nbgxsi0jk4QC1nDiFJ; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 17:28:17 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xs4all.nl; s=s2; t=1641227297; bh=If5izsgO9Ovl0mzssdWW07Ud0FI4nuOZYGGrzGX0lGY=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From: Subject; b=h92vDOvhJ1wIg870L5CnbQqHe/DUrLGhF3lztQyIW8fBpWNLY7lFNNAYAucWgZ15A CgmiPmv25l9lhHy0Tu7cSTGoDInsMLmKakOaWgbl9tzdGnPgvmj2KUJPY2n8G61JL4 8yutD5aED+SYxhiCVK0gHUfOlO1REeo2qUIdahIXlt4Y+gkggznqt5nbhmOqtruDqP /bJnk0uYPyvQOXt17lwxIs7st6USKw+65B+3zIe81dy0NkF0KMUo7GN1gTN66XEAS9 rdBACEnuSACccAwBcjTFFYNxbN6MH7I7leYKU1HhRILQ2Do0fPvzD/dw1Km/ODCLUV yahPiI8lhY3dA== Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:28:17 +0100 (CET) From: Erik Winkels To: "bug-guix@gnu.org" Message-ID: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> Subject: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591" X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.5-Rev27 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfDCJkEiGZbvD0GKdnaGiiTE2iIxHy+96AsP2cR3iMgaG6ajzgIF95jDr6CLJP7K2FYbKP9mSEkbe9LwqfkdglJh+y8JtFfctlqrpaO7IzDjuRDMP2x1s pHoF2SNTf0ef/EhYrZ9EFvhLMvcd/cHmC+BSeUSaybTnfpQq0qXLq4zkU4C97Sn98mmPza4sBSib0GoRqXezeNg6jv71TjafP7w= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=194.109.24.28; envelope-from=aerique@xs4all.nl; helo=lb2-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net X-Spam_score_int: -1 X-Spam_score: -0.2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.2 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 12:11:43 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) ------=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit When doing a `guix install flatpak` while having `gnupg` already installed as a user package I get this error: ``` $ guix package --list-installed [...] gnupg 2.2.32 out /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 $ guix install flatpak The following package will be installed: flatpak 1.12.1 guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg guix install: error: first entry: gnupg@2.2.30 /gnu/store/0snfzd41n430ddpq316j9v2z5fn2y62m-gnupg-2.2.30 guix install: error: ... propagated from flatpak@1.12.1 guix install: error: second entry: gnupg@2.2.32 /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 hint: Try upgrading both `flatpak' and `gnupg', or remove one of them from the profile. $ guix upgrade guix upgrade: warning: nothing to do ``` Worse, initially the Flatpak install did not complain because I had GnuPG installed as a system package. After installing Flatpak `gpg` mostly stopped working with `gpg-agent` segfaulting. It took a while to figure out Flatpak's GnuPG was the culprit. Regards, Erik ------=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
When doing a `guix install flatpak` while having `gnupg` already installed as a user package I get this error:

```
$ guix package --list-installed
[...]
gnupg 2.2.32 out /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32

$ guix install flatpak
The following package will be installed:
flatpak 1.12.1
guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg
guix install: error: first entry: gnupg@2.2.30 /gnu/store/0snfzd41n430ddpq316j9v2z5fn2y62m-gnupg-2.2.30
guix install: error: ... propagated from flatpak@1.12.1
guix install: error: second entry: gnupg@2.2.32 /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32
hint: Try upgrading both `flatpak' and `gnupg', or remove one of them from the profile.

$ guix upgrade
guix upgrade: warning: nothing to do
```

Worse, initially the Flatpak install did not complain because I had GnuPG installed as a system package. After installing Flatpak `gpg` mostly stopped working with `gpg-agent` segfaulting. It took a while to figure out Flatpak's GnuPG was the culprit.

Regards,
Erik
------=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 03 13:56:30 2022 Received: (at 52981) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 18:56:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36207 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SVP-0004YZ-0X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:56:30 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:37049) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SV7-0004Xo-R7 for 52981@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:56:25 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBAA5C0098; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:56:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:56:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=uhkpLXTtCQdYLmLvKZ0Ka0c7 xnkb8bVtngtGekN8QYE=; b=IBHs3jxaKMY+tpvq85f6IvGwDWvamSqJbnBwDqY4 SJoXBzl9fzpb4zs2aVYENX9fPcS/vHw+PYv5JSv569lBydZQxdhnodqk2SM6/vJW 2G+MAUGxb6xO2tz7sFCsOB4OVvrkqkK+B0BPizX/2Y8aUToxx37SZPpjPRir4Axf s28= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=uhkpLX TtCQdYLmLvKZ0Ka0c7xnkb8bVtngtGekN8QYE=; b=LOOAoC+BiSN4mg3JTbXPtV X6B50Z/ObmhfcARKn8aU4/KUghk0WROHbcIMFiWyy59xjzE/wQcxhIQtcbNh2d57 rSDcFNUuIswKV2MOd7c2ijP6NuKiyVG1VxCS1njeq6dQFfqpWrq1eCGuw5jaCVBK UVB/491vp6JXy6+mP6J8/i+7hqjun4JbigY24d8lVp3rHI+dY5zF9fFr4gyG0q6y Y4vruaVNmdyVQMIIcrqsV4AjsMzUMSN6BuSxnD2Phqe8HMtMFd0xMSamj5SS5Vbf uun6TOFMGgRw0UaKJ/1URMoPEtPsU9t1GjUUajdzLbzjaddSxyRM9ASVzDccU3NQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudefuddguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhf fgkeeikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudffieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghose hfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:56:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:56:02 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Erik Winkels Subject: Re: bug#52981: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install Message-ID: References: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52981 Cc: 52981@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:28:17PM +0100, Erik Winkels wrote: > When doing a `guix install flatpak` while having `gnupg` already installed as a user package I get this error: > > ``` > $ guix package --list-installed > [...] > gnupg 2.2.32 out /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 > > $ guix install flatpak > The following package will be installed: > flatpak 1.12.1 > guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg > guix install: error: first entry: gnupg@2.2.30 /gnu/store/0snfzd41n430ddpq316j9v2z5fn2y62m-gnupg-2.2.30 > guix install: error: ... propagated from flatpak@1.12.1 > guix install: error: second entry: gnupg@2.2.32 /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 > hint: Try upgrading both `flatpak' and `gnupg', or remove one of them from the profile. Thanks for the report. This is fallout from the fix for , where GnuPG 2.2.30 was released with significant bugs and we didn't notice until we'd already deployed it for users. Unfortunately, gnupg-2.2.30 has ~2400 dependent packages: ------ $ guix refresh -l gnupg@2.2.30 Building the following 1324 packages would ensure 2425 dependent packages are rebuilt: [...] ------ So, we can't upgrade it directly on the master branch. I'll look into upgrading Flatpak's dependency on GnuPG. > Worse, initially the Flatpak install did not complain because I had GnuPG installed as a system package. After installing Flatpak `gpg` mostly stopped working with `gpg-agent` segfaulting. It took a while to figure out Flatpak's GnuPG was the culprit. Oof :( From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 03 14:06:38 2022 Received: (at 52981-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 19:06:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36221 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SfG-0004pz-8L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:06:38 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:52615) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SfD-0004pj-Uu for 52981-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:06:37 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56995C004A; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 14:06:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:06:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=eObBs6nbYwzJGkJhjY6Sq0Sc Nc+Rtf2cY8JD/y5uFZY=; b=d2fC7JBjmSwawlyOZUaWZnVO+xPnUtSOSHkMDplW OWgvr4PN8I0OLjQEPGA2zLXCL0CunQGYyxFNMY3drQGWdbYacQO4cyhmDtHdweeE vYtonSyCKNU12eE/6Pc1uegKdeTGQrBMTaNjigbll/RLSpDkFUMAv7MSW8wab72r AIk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=eObBs6 nbYwzJGkJhjY6Sq0ScNc+Rtf2cY8JD/y5uFZY=; b=IUrgTa/WUQDt1YYlAq/r9r /fFSXlnbRpzkryh+qyL8NT0sXSCpXMcSSE/sTm35EOwSfP/Cgb12E7WBDylBmKtO GXml/p0+YCT6HcgI9DzSLoiWKrzC9s/c3T8oKN495bLy7KdpN22Qm2uEBCggDrNq LpBB+Adk+iAK0qroL1zMOT8/eGGKRGHdLB0E7Fo34geM77RwVC5gc0dNIIo5Fun5 meqLskasC/pSt6QamrkuNceLlMNLAGbl8tVFXRu6+/SYLmWtQE3HuIJKdGqN0BLH DBvKh34N5RRGXbQMJpPV7NZ1VKjUFCaffr1wvJILORkZrbZ8Wiw51WLqhcGJa8Nw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudefuddguddulecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhf fgkeeikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudffieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghose hfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 14:06:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 14:06:28 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Erik Winkels Subject: Re: bug#52981: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install Message-ID: References: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52981-done Cc: 52981-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:28:17PM +0100, Erik Winkels wrote: > guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg This should be fixed with commit 0d15873d7e898110c12fd77d32258ab55e16e7eb https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=0d15873d7e898110c12fd77d32258ab55e16e7eb From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:18:01 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator