From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:35:56 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52981: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install Resent-From: Erik Winkels Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 17:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 52981 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 52981@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: "bug-guix@gnu.org" Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16412299056397 (code B ref -1); Mon, 03 Jan 2022 17:12:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 17:11:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36091 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Qs4-0001f6-8J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 12:11:45 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QCD-0000Nz-Sk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:28:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QCD-0000j9-Nl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:28:29 -0500 Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.28]:52011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QC9-0000YE-Q5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:28:28 -0500 Received: from ox-appsuite3.xs4all.net ([194.109.29.136]) by smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net with ESMTPSA id 4QC1nbgxsi0jk4QC1nDiFJ; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 17:28:17 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xs4all.nl; s=s2; t=1641227297; bh=If5izsgO9Ovl0mzssdWW07Ud0FI4nuOZYGGrzGX0lGY=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From: Subject; b=h92vDOvhJ1wIg870L5CnbQqHe/DUrLGhF3lztQyIW8fBpWNLY7lFNNAYAucWgZ15A CgmiPmv25l9lhHy0Tu7cSTGoDInsMLmKakOaWgbl9tzdGnPgvmj2KUJPY2n8G61JL4 8yutD5aED+SYxhiCVK0gHUfOlO1REeo2qUIdahIXlt4Y+gkggznqt5nbhmOqtruDqP /bJnk0uYPyvQOXt17lwxIs7st6USKw+65B+3zIe81dy0NkF0KMUo7GN1gTN66XEAS9 rdBACEnuSACccAwBcjTFFYNxbN6MH7I7leYKU1HhRILQ2Do0fPvzD/dw1Km/ODCLUV yahPiI8lhY3dA== Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:28:17 +0100 (CET) From: Erik Winkels Message-ID: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591" X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.5-Rev27 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfDCJkEiGZbvD0GKdnaGiiTE2iIxHy+96AsP2cR3iMgaG6ajzgIF95jDr6CLJP7K2FYbKP9mSEkbe9LwqfkdglJh+y8JtFfctlqrpaO7IzDjuRDMP2x1s pHoF2SNTf0ef/EhYrZ9EFvhLMvcd/cHmC+BSeUSaybTnfpQq0qXLq4zkU4C97Sn98mmPza4sBSib0GoRqXezeNg6jv71TjafP7w= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=194.109.24.28; envelope-from=aerique@xs4all.nl; helo=lb2-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net X-Spam_score_int: -1 X-Spam_score: -0.2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.2 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 12:11:43 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) ------=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit When doing a `guix install flatpak` while having `gnupg` already installed as a user package I get this error: ``` $ guix package --list-installed [...] gnupg 2.2.32 out /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 $ guix install flatpak The following package will be installed: flatpak 1.12.1 guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg guix install: error: first entry: gnupg@2.2.30 /gnu/store/0snfzd41n430ddpq316j9v2z5fn2y62m-gnupg-2.2.30 guix install: error: ... propagated from flatpak@1.12.1 guix install: error: second entry: gnupg@2.2.32 /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 hint: Try upgrading both `flatpak' and `gnupg', or remove one of them from the profile. $ guix upgrade guix upgrade: warning: nothing to do ``` Worse, initially the Flatpak install did not complain because I had GnuPG installed as a system package. After installing Flatpak `gpg` mostly stopped working with `gpg-agent` segfaulting. It took a while to figure out Flatpak's GnuPG was the culprit. Regards, Erik ------=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
When doing a `guix install flatpak` while having `gnupg` already installed as a user package I get this error:

```
$ guix package --list-installed
[...]
gnupg 2.2.32 out /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32

$ guix install flatpak
The following package will be installed:
flatpak 1.12.1
guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg
guix install: error: first entry: gnupg@2.2.30 /gnu/store/0snfzd41n430ddpq316j9v2z5fn2y62m-gnupg-2.2.30
guix install: error: ... propagated from flatpak@1.12.1
guix install: error: second entry: gnupg@2.2.32 /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32
hint: Try upgrading both `flatpak' and `gnupg', or remove one of them from the profile.

$ guix upgrade
guix upgrade: warning: nothing to do
```

Worse, initially the Flatpak install did not complain because I had GnuPG installed as a system package. After installing Flatpak `gpg` mostly stopped working with `gpg-agent` segfaulting. It took a while to figure out Flatpak's GnuPG was the culprit.

Regards,
Erik
------=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:35:56 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52981: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 18:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52981 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Erik Winkels Cc: 52981@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52981-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52981.164123619017528 (code B ref 52981); Mon, 03 Jan 2022 18:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 52981) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 18:56:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36207 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SVP-0004YZ-0X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:56:30 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:37049) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SV7-0004Xo-R7 for 52981@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:56:25 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBAA5C0098; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:56:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:56:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=uhkpLXTtCQdYLmLvKZ0Ka0c7 xnkb8bVtngtGekN8QYE=; b=IBHs3jxaKMY+tpvq85f6IvGwDWvamSqJbnBwDqY4 SJoXBzl9fzpb4zs2aVYENX9fPcS/vHw+PYv5JSv569lBydZQxdhnodqk2SM6/vJW 2G+MAUGxb6xO2tz7sFCsOB4OVvrkqkK+B0BPizX/2Y8aUToxx37SZPpjPRir4Axf s28= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=uhkpLX TtCQdYLmLvKZ0Ka0c7xnkb8bVtngtGekN8QYE=; b=LOOAoC+BiSN4mg3JTbXPtV X6B50Z/ObmhfcARKn8aU4/KUghk0WROHbcIMFiWyy59xjzE/wQcxhIQtcbNh2d57 rSDcFNUuIswKV2MOd7c2ijP6NuKiyVG1VxCS1njeq6dQFfqpWrq1eCGuw5jaCVBK UVB/491vp6JXy6+mP6J8/i+7hqjun4JbigY24d8lVp3rHI+dY5zF9fFr4gyG0q6y Y4vruaVNmdyVQMIIcrqsV4AjsMzUMSN6BuSxnD2Phqe8HMtMFd0xMSamj5SS5Vbf uun6TOFMGgRw0UaKJ/1URMoPEtPsU9t1GjUUajdzLbzjaddSxyRM9ASVzDccU3NQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudefuddguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhf fgkeeikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudffieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghose hfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:56:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:56:02 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:28:17PM +0100, Erik Winkels wrote: > When doing a `guix install flatpak` while having `gnupg` already installed as a user package I get this error: > > ``` > $ guix package --list-installed > [...] > gnupg 2.2.32 out /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 > > $ guix install flatpak > The following package will be installed: > flatpak 1.12.1 > guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg > guix install: error: first entry: gnupg@2.2.30 /gnu/store/0snfzd41n430ddpq316j9v2z5fn2y62m-gnupg-2.2.30 > guix install: error: ... propagated from flatpak@1.12.1 > guix install: error: second entry: gnupg@2.2.32 /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 > hint: Try upgrading both `flatpak' and `gnupg', or remove one of them from the profile. Thanks for the report. This is fallout from the fix for , where GnuPG 2.2.30 was released with significant bugs and we didn't notice until we'd already deployed it for users. Unfortunately, gnupg-2.2.30 has ~2400 dependent packages: ------ $ guix refresh -l gnupg@2.2.30 Building the following 1324 packages would ensure 2425 dependent packages are rebuilt: [...] ------ So, we can't upgrade it directly on the master branch. I'll look into upgrading Flatpak's dependency on GnuPG. > Worse, initially the Flatpak install did not complain because I had GnuPG installed as a system package. After installing Flatpak `gpg` mostly stopped working with `gpg-agent` segfaulting. It took a while to figure out Flatpak's GnuPG was the culprit. Oof :( From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:35:56 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Erik Winkels Subject: bug#52981: closed (Re: bug#52981: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install) Message-ID: References: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 52981 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 52981@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 19:07:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1641236822-18642-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1641236822-18642-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #52981: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 52981@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 52981: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D52981 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1641236822-18642-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 52981-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 19:06:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36221 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SfG-0004pz-8L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:06:38 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:52615) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SfD-0004pj-Uu for 52981-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:06:37 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56995C004A; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 14:06:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:06:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=eObBs6nbYwzJGkJhjY6Sq0Sc Nc+Rtf2cY8JD/y5uFZY=; b=d2fC7JBjmSwawlyOZUaWZnVO+xPnUtSOSHkMDplW OWgvr4PN8I0OLjQEPGA2zLXCL0CunQGYyxFNMY3drQGWdbYacQO4cyhmDtHdweeE vYtonSyCKNU12eE/6Pc1uegKdeTGQrBMTaNjigbll/RLSpDkFUMAv7MSW8wab72r AIk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=eObBs6 nbYwzJGkJhjY6Sq0ScNc+Rtf2cY8JD/y5uFZY=; b=IUrgTa/WUQDt1YYlAq/r9r /fFSXlnbRpzkryh+qyL8NT0sXSCpXMcSSE/sTm35EOwSfP/Cgb12E7WBDylBmKtO GXml/p0+YCT6HcgI9DzSLoiWKrzC9s/c3T8oKN495bLy7KdpN22Qm2uEBCggDrNq LpBB+Adk+iAK0qroL1zMOT8/eGGKRGHdLB0E7Fo34geM77RwVC5gc0dNIIo5Fun5 meqLskasC/pSt6QamrkuNceLlMNLAGbl8tVFXRu6+/SYLmWtQE3HuIJKdGqN0BLH DBvKh34N5RRGXbQMJpPV7NZ1VKjUFCaffr1wvJILORkZrbZ8Wiw51WLqhcGJa8Nw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudefuddguddulecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhf fgkeeikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudffieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghose hfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 14:06:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 14:06:28 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Erik Winkels Subject: Re: bug#52981: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install Message-ID: References: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52981-done Cc: 52981-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:28:17PM +0100, Erik Winkels wrote: > guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg This should be fixed with commit 0d15873d7e898110c12fd77d32258ab55e16e7eb https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=0d15873d7e898110c12fd77d32258ab55e16e7eb ------------=_1641236822-18642-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 17:11:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36091 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Qs4-0001f6-8J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 12:11:45 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QCD-0000Nz-Sk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:28:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QCD-0000j9-Nl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:28:29 -0500 Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.28]:52011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QC9-0000YE-Q5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:28:28 -0500 Received: from ox-appsuite3.xs4all.net ([194.109.29.136]) by smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net with ESMTPSA id 4QC1nbgxsi0jk4QC1nDiFJ; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 17:28:17 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xs4all.nl; s=s2; t=1641227297; bh=If5izsgO9Ovl0mzssdWW07Ud0FI4nuOZYGGrzGX0lGY=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:From: Subject; b=h92vDOvhJ1wIg870L5CnbQqHe/DUrLGhF3lztQyIW8fBpWNLY7lFNNAYAucWgZ15A CgmiPmv25l9lhHy0Tu7cSTGoDInsMLmKakOaWgbl9tzdGnPgvmj2KUJPY2n8G61JL4 8yutD5aED+SYxhiCVK0gHUfOlO1REeo2qUIdahIXlt4Y+gkggznqt5nbhmOqtruDqP /bJnk0uYPyvQOXt17lwxIs7st6USKw+65B+3zIe81dy0NkF0KMUo7GN1gTN66XEAS9 rdBACEnuSACccAwBcjTFFYNxbN6MH7I7leYKU1HhRILQ2Do0fPvzD/dw1Km/ODCLUV yahPiI8lhY3dA== Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:28:17 +0100 (CET) From: Erik Winkels To: "bug-guix@gnu.org" Message-ID: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> Subject: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591" X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.5-Rev27 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfDCJkEiGZbvD0GKdnaGiiTE2iIxHy+96AsP2cR3iMgaG6ajzgIF95jDr6CLJP7K2FYbKP9mSEkbe9LwqfkdglJh+y8JtFfctlqrpaO7IzDjuRDMP2x1s pHoF2SNTf0ef/EhYrZ9EFvhLMvcd/cHmC+BSeUSaybTnfpQq0qXLq4zkU4C97Sn98mmPza4sBSib0GoRqXezeNg6jv71TjafP7w= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=194.109.24.28; envelope-from=aerique@xs4all.nl; helo=lb2-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net X-Spam_score_int: -1 X-Spam_score: -0.2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.2 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 12:11:43 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) ------=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit When doing a `guix install flatpak` while having `gnupg` already installed as a user package I get this error: ``` $ guix package --list-installed [...] gnupg 2.2.32 out /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 $ guix install flatpak The following package will be installed: flatpak 1.12.1 guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg guix install: error: first entry: gnupg@2.2.30 /gnu/store/0snfzd41n430ddpq316j9v2z5fn2y62m-gnupg-2.2.30 guix install: error: ... propagated from flatpak@1.12.1 guix install: error: second entry: gnupg@2.2.32 /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 hint: Try upgrading both `flatpak' and `gnupg', or remove one of them from the profile. $ guix upgrade guix upgrade: warning: nothing to do ``` Worse, initially the Flatpak install did not complain because I had GnuPG installed as a system package. After installing Flatpak `gpg` mostly stopped working with `gpg-agent` segfaulting. It took a while to figure out Flatpak's GnuPG was the culprit. Regards, Erik ------=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
When doing a `guix install flatpak` while having `gnupg` already installed as a user package I get this error:

```
$ guix package --list-installed
[...]
gnupg 2.2.32 out /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32

$ guix install flatpak
The following package will be installed:
flatpak 1.12.1
guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg
guix install: error: first entry: gnupg@2.2.30 /gnu/store/0snfzd41n430ddpq316j9v2z5fn2y62m-gnupg-2.2.30
guix install: error: ... propagated from flatpak@1.12.1
guix install: error: second entry: gnupg@2.2.32 /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32
hint: Try upgrading both `flatpak' and `gnupg', or remove one of them from the profile.

$ guix upgrade
guix upgrade: warning: nothing to do
```

Worse, initially the Flatpak install did not complain because I had GnuPG installed as a system package. After installing Flatpak `gpg` mostly stopped working with `gpg-agent` segfaulting. It took a while to figure out Flatpak's GnuPG was the culprit.

Regards,
Erik
------=_Part_3099518_1320869345.1641227297591-- ------------=_1641236822-18642-1--