GNU bug report logs - #52977
[PATCH 0/6] Update some minetest packages

Previous Next

Full log

Message #37 received at 52977 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>, Ludovic
 Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 52977 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#52977: [PATCH 0/6] Update some minetest packages
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 01:52:53 +0100

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, dem 06.01.2022 um 00:18 +0100 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Yes, but it has been a while ago so I preferred to not overcomplicate
> the patch series more.  There's also the complication that
> (revision ...) might need to be incremented. Yet another
> complication:
> minetest mods can have two separate version schemes: the
> ‘release titles’ on content.minetest.net, and the version they use in
> forum posts or git repos.  For minetest-ethereal, they are different,
> and worse, the latest version on content.minetest.net doesn't have a
> corresponding version on the forum.
If I recall correctly, this was also a point of debate in the initial
series that added the importer.  Can we establish an ordering/heuristic
here?  E.g. "if we have git tags use those, otherwise use contentdb",
"always use contentdb" or "always use whatever was edited most
recently"?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.