From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 02 20:29:58 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 01:29:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4CAf-0004Mp-SE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 20:29:58 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57540) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4CAe-0004Mi-Gz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 20:29:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4CAe-0006JG-Ac for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 20:29:56 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f170.google.com ([209.85.215.170]:45618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4CAc-00036U-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 20:29:55 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 2so28911477pgb.12 for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 17:29:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jb6Bi6d3epb9zum7uIzE9aAcfskVOj11i19COUR9ScQ=; b=6yImchfXXzcZYFqdsRSgjM7yZx4NFLRi1qLZVOSX+lxAt60CYu6/EQG/9nLD/tMDbk Rc7VhgQxDSvM5GupHsXDXq6X6CbQYk9aQ50sM4BBCxwOxYf2ViCxER9bJbbn0y2D5N0x bGar/o5PO8/JSGhqFSWqnrDlElHOd2cFfETX5ZbBU5ezUhu9PfGLG6kPs2GHYcWgNdhX hE8weOV/N1iNSyVVMSo5nXyJWkeWJRe+xq4ODchOTE4stRk6DsqA54lqyOEfexxy2K4M /cW/JomWYvBoxFlElCUjJtIVUl2/bjzwwoU57UFiUrjW7mQJGxZTDk2DsE8g4zfbpO47 Kriw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530pyLUUYwzxnZq7/XGbq4kDDZBgSUX4ts7wJKZmsLPg4v59AoOM JD/7PqSUnkkwFMdZ71jTgEX8x3Ip2/QSJpHXWKY85ODk X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoPh/81phAy2u4Eztw3KnriqP41RS/1kBVsHMmQTHkh9qk/QnqruqeWIgHgKSzSqCvLgOfyMjpoPzm8628GPc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2444:b0:4ab:15b9:20e5 with SMTP id d4-20020a056a00244400b004ab15b920e5mr44119990pfj.0.1641173393373; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 17:29:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:29:52 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas X-Debbugs-CC: Stefan Monnier MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:29:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Tests warn after eieio-compat.el was moved to obsolete/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.170; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-f170.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) > branch: master > commit d65534d254b3965ea82a9300c12c5c07f88818b7 > Author: Stefan Monnier > Commit: Stefan Monnier > > * lisp/emacs-list/eieio-compat.el: Really move to obsolete After this or some other recent and related commit, we get these warnings: In toplevel form: lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio-tests/eieio-test-methodinvoke.el:58:1: Warning: Package eieio-compat is deprecated GEN lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-x-tests.log In toplevel form: lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio-tests/eieio-tests.el:30:1: Warning: Package eieio-compat is deprecated I'm not sure about the best way to fix them. Could we just move those parts that require eieio-compat.el to a new file eieio-compat-tests.el? I will silence these warnings using `with-no-warnings' for now, and we can track progress on this here instead. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 02 23:22:33 2022 Received: (at 52971) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 04:22:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34009 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Erh-0000bX-8m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 23:22:33 -0500 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:46598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Ere-0000bF-B1 for 52971@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 23:22:32 -0500 Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3E779442BEC; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 23:22:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 064C3442BE8; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 23:22:23 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1641183743; bh=DR6gLe2gt20weKH/y/KX7V7F/oOXGlswTKAOJcVP3bg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=fbPQWd4PKxTGr2p+wycM1rd0mn03Kk876hpkasG/2L0UJVhUOQmsBkZ8ZPGIcmv8C wN/FXHXAeQJRrEXqJQJOCI5bEjg4ProQI8DBq0/Ds1E8ngnSOpShlff+vdkA7TcNhV f9YPcEBA1sJ/qAA6W45EUfKzcvjiHxogFxPdLgfm8A+afAZvbq5sdBZEZIXvob7puV XDdK4TIjhOnQ+97tCpo4LEoKEJ6681W/SJU6iD5OVL2/MJ+bX1HcvpHLIV6X4fzJP1 1o9iqv09Nl/UJdnL8MHHQfdUChOn21K4YbqlpMy6d+Qyth6eSyWixRm0rZ6xF7p7AZ h1tM221rNGiRA== Received: from ceviche (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B154212040A; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 23:22:22 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#52971: Tests warn after eieio-compat.el was moved to obsolete/ Message-ID: References: Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 23:22:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:29:52 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.071 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52971 Cc: 52971@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > I'm not sure about the best way to fix them. Could we just move those > parts that require eieio-compat.el to a new file eieio-compat-tests.el? That will just move the warnings. > I will silence these warnings using `with-no-warnings' for now, Sounds good. > and we can track progress on this here instead. Thanks, Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 03 11:49:01 2022 Received: (at 52971) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 16:49:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36022 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QW5-00010C-0h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:49:01 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f170.google.com ([209.85.210.170]:40884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4QW1-0000zv-Rs for 52971@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 11:48:59 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f170.google.com with SMTP id q3so25593080pfs.7 for <52971@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 08:48:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=saLAeijG1tJGaGe5MkwGoNo9+TGEzmqoj/H2uYhFH7E=; b=h4woq+UZWYdw23OcEFbrwG7Q/XqqF/Z0jH9Wd1fuBXZrzhAqNbSP8yCOsWdBQxbNRC h0T6xbXuX4XK2tKv+2zzVcoWZqMk7z+PByUwqKSxSN41xog1fNv/kxJDmevAQDTMZB+u NssJBvEaSHu1xUFyYRv4E/jijW7sp+DncHGtKff9BCWIk0e567tgzX5JcfXUvgIG2ckr 5a4nLmztezqeYZ35kCabeG6cYCpsS4qvUOgR9cyHkovD59XzhNhBrI6wLkDpKyxXeqXs hMvD7C2bjPP4XdZJ7yhz+4HaQj8SUqKHYEZjAopoYlFXOTfzFs77/G3ajweghMX2S5Cr cbaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530MMDiBgeW4ug4QMBoy7tIvW5+8mZhkHub/pUMjWJZ+RjfNtiCd B0baX0UgbSH3otyDh26Q+lHjuUSm97hmIXmTqMA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeMdR96ZbSCMN0SkjuFG5uDojO4a2ixFohktl7Kwi9++T0cztOheBEWoU+AIp1iH6eXGbm1g1gTCn0nT00WF8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2444:b0:4ab:15b9:20e5 with SMTP id d4-20020a056a00244400b004ab15b920e5mr46840492pfj.0.1641228531776; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 08:48:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 11:48:51 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 02 Jan 2022 23:22:21 -0500") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 11:48:51 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#52971: Tests warn after eieio-compat.el was moved to obsolete/ To: Stefan Monnier Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52971 Cc: 52971@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Stefan Monnier writes: >> I'm not sure about the best way to fix them. Could we just move those >> parts that require eieio-compat.el to a new file eieio-compat-tests.el? > > That will just move the warnings. My thinking was that if these tests are only for obsolete code, it would be better to isolate them all in one file. But I have no real opinion either way. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 14 03:59:59 2022 Received: (at 52971) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2022 08:59:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35552 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n8IRD-0003zC-8T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 03:59:59 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:35218) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n8IQw-0003ya-EP for 52971@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 03:59:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nfIu/LGKFupwNkTcclss47Vlw2X/lrTsF6Mr6rEQY5M=; b=BltStgcvwJ/OiHgiAS7I9m/M9w +0m3OP4Rtsctugj2yPI7LN9vUd95lgF/G38mAo+ZlAFsrFmAPLQ9oCiemQtb70PIjytdDjsVI50E2 lR5YIrAc7FNKnv6eH6nKNs6e3xvtKLYvip3SeJCPS1Qq7s6EG4QAY4CAsmIM5YJe0q4A=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n8IQm-0001ue-RU; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:59:35 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#52971: Tests warn after eieio-compat.el was moved to obsolete/ References: X-Now-Playing: Noveller's _Arrow_: "Pattern Recognition" Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:59:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Mon, 3 Jan 2022 11:48:51 -0500") Message-ID: <87lezipua3.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >>> I'm not sure about the best way to fix them. Could we just move those >>> parts that require eieio-compat.el to a new file eieio-compat-tests. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52971 Cc: 52971@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Kangas writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >>> I'm not sure about the best way to fix them. Could we just move those >>> parts that require eieio-compat.el to a new file eieio-compat-tests.el? >> >> That will just move the warnings. > > My thinking was that if these tests are only for obsolete code, it would > be better to isolate them all in one file. But I have no real opinion > either way. I think isolating them in a new test file makes sense -- makes things clearer. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 18 07:11:06 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2022 11:11:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54040 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOdQY-0006hW-Ip for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 07:11:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-f48.google.com ([209.85.222.48]:43998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOdQS-0006gX-S8 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 07:11:05 -0400 Received: by mail-ua1-f48.google.com with SMTP id s18so513225uac.10 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 04:11:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:from:to:cc; bh=2Ong3SU3YfZZ07XFNHs0ZeUXMSiyyeUMTNj43GocoA8=; b=ba0BrjGHM/F6tVdxFam4ucIcDZt+PJzbHRQO2JQkqNvMevWvS1+bk+b2XaDWrnoXWA 6qZiPYhVvSMjLDa1HvT8VZgqFBQTYwONwev6ecNLezVIlY0rYlJxp3z3ouTn7pKVlnt5 7Ys1ra5WdNJXZAo2c8LGmXx+Oio/5EdEniGx5zWPcOjFiCGGmIXYRPEjtZUnGw7vJdsi /hZ/Dz/3ivch7vk1mxaXe2DWz4eAfW19d1UVt3/VrHDTomoD2pYvlFAbUhQ8mSgk0Tpw X4LAD+LyE63hUOJ7DAYumXmCe51/9LHutQDnhP8vjvniQvE2rzAcfeKdFDR0PJpZ+Pm0 9LJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc; bh=2Ong3SU3YfZZ07XFNHs0ZeUXMSiyyeUMTNj43GocoA8=; b=63FkR6nYJJDI/fewagl04QgDjdirBASaGn47yTbCxAHy72BwtIWIkUN2NUz9Ukfcqm aO/UdFZKvFyjQuSnd2oJG0dG1lts9VC44ZAfmqS3MwEoWGDXr8pYMEQFY/ECR4GuSQrC E/YAVf0uPjP9m+5wEL1VDaZOpnEHNT/KHJZtEd45X1tLPKOSL8ySFwfIE4g/YxOGfy6L rGHeYTMu9PaznzE0TLps9QyrACiQ6q/aXCjzu860TiQ+wtFaxgngzlqviTALj7j3cbVz 4toW7RehK0RAeg/SlZmYxfKpFtMnimbznyeXwA8Fnf3dgUZ5jaPg5/Yuh7yk/C0IQfbk OveA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2pFAiBsI2PXbOPG+MU6pmvUT3qIydp1yXJ4XIQ97zt66aJKWL/ chWsBlQnIgcQVZlyN5XD9uk/HugnSim/NQQ/wsaJQycC X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7HDgv8DS8TV3R7DBhh+l58GCTFNvL5aAD3mOwSXtxfnKMBXW5TrEAmKaRmvjV2TIsD8lYv+dihn1UVW0IrLSU= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6397:0:b0:383:eeaf:7c4b with SMTP id y23-20020ab06397000000b00383eeaf7c4bmr823670uao.47.1660821055299; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 04:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 04:10:54 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 04:10:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: control message for bug #52971 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) severity 52971 wishlist quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 28 14:34:25 2025 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2025 19:34:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1to67s-0007Mq-IC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:34:25 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]:59868) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1to67q-0007Lu-5C for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:34:23 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e5050d19e9so1653819a12.3 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:34:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740771256; x=1741376056; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V9qxdYSi3v5ilnnDJ2UvKl8luBNRQGNty1PpZtHcX7E=; b=I29EmsWgBumkCfa8OfcDden1oDDHBiMpksunzCcdKYERcAUfsOngcDynZpmnLvUl30 RXJBB0Z9HWSx4nLj/LjrTbbDJMtNw8Pfc+jesP0inp3LsDvwLMs46kEzcKi0/Q6FzFRx Z24coILEHLX14Dc/uZkD8tq7gArtpInPnr1R6B7hnaVkmhOBbtdSxPt7KPMKNZd9E9Yu X8DwO+jILP+UcQfnOV7EuolxVgQ1yEwohXG31ngcvZaSwwcZo+8TOKFOqp9lDfIrG6wM lJwsRA+UVAy67jBdgPm/4a+v3z21uOM3xXiwDJ+4EbgsUJF+DXiiPRUqsuzHEBXaYN4R gToA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740771256; x=1741376056; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V9qxdYSi3v5ilnnDJ2UvKl8luBNRQGNty1PpZtHcX7E=; b=phxI1XNck6H41nkvdeMKIAA7iH8eNDkuF9hktWxQK/3ZU2cFSDC8vn685GhxadH6dC +jO2CS4Qe0SgjPCD982b8zVLXcEopnT1JubsCPdOMd+ccVRXYHRme6JFbY1G59ZPHP/z J70SqZLSnd6ZWfF1I83K9tSSeW2mF3yG+mMd5q0F6TFtLTAy+dos5MqiHntPCA/VknvY Jys47ZLcLchIupRsDYov2yTFqINlyGLWA7oBEcUBiPNtshuot05QvuBctjFTTnO692BG tG+rte3C87qhpID49CjzxlRr4yn1RSgqMVHaw7hrWtOFJyGn5FD7DO1nZgeK0YAkfP1z 1+5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwthtcN/HlpYpeZoZ47h08nQ10uCsoyoY21r6po/QeS4wtislWT 2ypvrPhjj5La9Asp4lMD2bXj5+paRng3GGMYEIvSOVICgzdPn6+hzEAhmVke48eRrOa+QoU63tf SaI+hIuvdEyu1FDNCFTRSukhKQetbB0Wv X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsz4n3hS0/TspWl4fzwmg73ltg2DMMb/QLBZBmHZZjGZ0xlYKxhXZEeFYD7Cpg DCdVazxFsAxvmI9UXVIv/nXOPZS3IVW2si3nMZraT+nN+j/F9mY97S3dceWkyYIBvYHEDGLaas6 UrpiS8Xv4+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEtOPEGQHzWaQNGyuZsTwRfeq9sLA6yMrnL0GkBf7zfqD3rMKsDt92UNF6tWLIWuJca05sDvviemKmT0zFaVzU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2695:b0:5d9:fc81:e197 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e4d6ad5f88mr3577244a12.8.1740771255913; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:34:15 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:34:15 -0800 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JrgFH20Q9q64BigV20b9jv1tY6oQVelSznbaQVT58IBWc7L5DCuS7Oza14 Message-ID: Subject: control message for bug #52971 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 52971 quit From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:56:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 11:24:38 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator