GNU bug report logs - #52909
Some man pages are not built correctly

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#52909: closed (Some man pages are not built correctly)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 20:26:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:25:16 -0400
with message-id <87bkr0y383.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#52909: Some man pages are not built correctly
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #52909,
regarding Some man pages are not built correctly
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
52909: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52909
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Some man pages are not built correctly
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 19:00:45 -0500

On Guix Git commit c7d74a9bccfc1b1274fc8754a6e78bb6887c7fea, at least
some manpages are not being built correctly for packages such as elogind
and gnome-keyring-daemon. Are we seeing raw groff input? I'm not sure of
the technology used here.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 52909-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#52909: Some man pages are not built correctly
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:25:16 -0400

Hi,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Leo,
>
> Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:
>
>> On Guix Git commit c7d74a9bccfc1b1274fc8754a6e78bb6887c7fea, at least
>> some manpages are not being built correctly for packages such as elogind
>> and gnome-keyring-daemon. Are we seeing raw groff input? I'm not sure of
>> the technology used here.

[...]

> I've read the same kind of issue reported to the bind9
> project and its resolution, which was very helpful:
> https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2310.  It seems it's
> a DocBook XSL stylesheet problem resolved in
> https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/pull/111 but not yet
> released...

This is now fixable in an ad-hoc fashion on master by replacing the
problematic docbook-xsl with docbook-xsl-next, and fixed for good on
core-updates.

Closing.

Thanks,

Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.