GNU bug report logs - #52897
[PATCH] doc: Add instructions on upgrading the build daemon with doas.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>

Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 11:13:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #22 received at 52897-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com>, 52897-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Subject: Re: bug#52897: [PATCH] doc: Add instructions on upgrading the build
 daemon with doas.
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 14:27:47 -0400
Hello,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 23:49, Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> I've explicitly removed sudo from my machine as supposedly sudo is a
>> large complex codebase that likely has bugs (although that's probably
>> just openBSD propaganda).
>
> Guix documentation uniquely relies on ’sudo’.  And for instance, I was
> not aware of such propaganda. :-)
>
> Well, I do not have an opinion, but AFAIK, Guix does not work on the top
> of OpenBSD (yet! who knows if someone will not port a BSD kernel with a
> GNU userland as Debian did some time ago [1] ;-))
>
> For me, it is a niche and for consistency, all the commands using ’sudo’
> should also provide the ’doas’ way.  And I am not convinced the burden
> is worth.  Well, I do not have an opinion.

I'm also not convinced it brings much, especially since Guix can't be
used where 'doas' is likely to be encountered (BSDs).

Closing.

Thanks for the discussion!

Maxim




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 319 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.