From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 29 13:42:01 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2021 18:42:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50356 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n2dth-0004bA-7T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:42:01 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34444) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n2dtf-0004b0-75 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:41:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2dtc-0006VS-QQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:41:57 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:39491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2dtX-0000tw-Jv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:41:52 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05415C01D0; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:41:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:41:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= mesmtp; bh=irCYMlJd/v97AASwtzuqdL9y5NAG3bycI/4CKpOm1tQ=; b=qTTvx gbOtvNDX6hhCueaC+8z82GELfxQ4czAdBzha9IEWfD/0FVbVKqqZF98RWBuaX2Ty vnNN4Eekp8yXd3HsJJVL+noD7yEy5xAAFbKocOvFy5B06v4gChnMTJhNEdKq76Vn j39V9NguF58KNGe5QLwtDFX6ly5cEmGB5eDL3Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=irCYMlJd/v97AASwtzuqdL9y5NAG3 bycI/4CKpOm1tQ=; b=KzIAI6YCZD4KpPHdu7mAB98PKKDBPjqi+ZRWEn4ckhR1r +zREqYpm59KXZUg8vY7pcx5pgRgDjuS/kaF4hXrsm5PdHpuUOzIBU7pA0SxvF2Dk +XRtcABnkWbv7pmHL3jR0JhteLiNdva0rTf4gE0ndtVnnBkSvEPbBWLSpA3dXuDB MuQx2AblOXWNi1NKkbdzQICnbsxn7iCz97cZz/3wgIrABj7PVJUgQQxHh/V2J3nK CDnPQx/NqwJhRdEKN0A9irR9agaIXDJvhlHGNhsgJjGnUlsh+pfmXbJQkSBzxwhI iCDJ8+dVCHTdLf8i9kvs+RmTj7XpsClHKVEb+tnvA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddvuddguddujecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggusehttdertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghr ihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffhedtfeeftddvueeifeduueejvdekhe ffueeijefgvdetleegheegfeehheduudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgr rhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:41:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:41:49 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: [installer] Can we remove locale-2.31 from locale-libcs in the upcoming release? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) I noticed that the installer built from current master includes locales from glibc 2.31 and 2.33, because they are both in %default-locale-libcs. Will we still need this workaround for the upcoming release? Presumably, new installations will not include anything that uses glibc 2.31. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 03 08:48:40 2022 Received: (at 52879-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 13:48:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4NhY-0003s1-If for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 08:48:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60248) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4NhW-0003rn-Ef for 52879-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 08:48:40 -0500 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=51564 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4NhR-0003W6-21; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 08:48:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=RF2RE8gqmCsqwJvH21lW5iE9GEoFwnhPUVzdAJRJc9c=; b=Wv9OXUjgrBSzhEQWxo8k XISmhxAA8BWb3oEilCw9bCGdacBn5g87y5tDlXqh4CE//ySTK2ks88Lbfc9zDmAjmqAsALq6TwzPU vD27skykwHWK/b4dAVg5PIrU90Y21zK8em5QSFVsuYRfMbmcnzLjtMn55KEoc2Ioj6YoezwPs9Kz5 sn0gOK4/rGZmvFuCd6QjbuSc6I85b+VBYJPg5uzvogh1RXfALMfiqabZwElGQB9Gaugz9p+GStWHV 3zLk2SG05cEqWo0uuUL5qpEzl80AnJyt8jFJhYgM4eRwxRfk0qop0On/9WY3VT6EkoteqODqDfjrX f/BZ7LQ0xNnKeA==; Received: from rtr.23.90.204.206.unyc.it ([23.90.204.206]:40544 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4NhR-0008Dy-6u; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 08:48:33 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#52879: [installer] Can we remove locale-2.31 from locale-libcs in the upcoming release? References: Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:48:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:41:49 -0500") Message-ID: <871r1p53rm.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52879-done Cc: 52879-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, > I noticed that the installer built from current master includes locales > from glibc 2.31 and 2.33, because they are both in > %default-locale-libcs. > > Will we still need this workaround for the upcoming release? Presumably, > new installations will not include anything that uses glibc 2.31. Done with 52c94de76795a7e7151bf5f5d6a5a6b9d3240a18. Thanks, Mathieu From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:18:10 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator