From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 28 11:52:20 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2021 16:52:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Fi0-0002qJ-GF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:52:20 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n2FQg-0002OW-La for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:34:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2FQg-00014b-Et for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:34:26 -0500 Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::235] (port=46910 helo=mail-oi1-x235.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2FQe-0005iB-Fx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:34:26 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-x235.google.com with SMTP id v6so30723798oib.13 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:34:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cameronchaparro-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LMgR/2G+7ZSrnBBmgc4R0bSvrcoEt9UM/mS5yCiPq9k=; b=woqIqD2praUsdY7j4NKsnrzfSvM9sn4BPwTv+Yhsnct3D3iPnF439vEdC5yV3Rpaom mSFDT4tYM1HHbRglK6v8E6LDl28ZZ1l52FttarLybzjaXZ1gz9xHMhfHYwFS3SFyumkI yAFtWzOysbTWEc5671+ZH7yyoYM/45BAAOZ7P2CnznLFuS+A6HI4YDaj95pNCCn/REJd Ir8wuSR54GAl9te5dnlw+Bz+yfhRywobwgNOLu+YmgZKXl9rZzEDms9/Rsp4ANst8qTu IURrL5Z80K9AgyeGflcFTu64yPTx7NqmseyB7ZdGOVuPHYTy/BoK34BsXJwWECdA7ngh boNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LMgR/2G+7ZSrnBBmgc4R0bSvrcoEt9UM/mS5yCiPq9k=; b=D57eR0L6YznAaw7YtbCGvLv8Ds+urZYO3Ii3oWkmTOQjmhi7l8fXY0456qFlolez2Y VvKaPprnvv9ByY9pN5QfiApAVT7stXNFVIalolHb5WD5vD8LfbD/bTKdLlEUp+6b57xz pngpGVV1SL97glIRPLynKXu77cp76aq5vo82lbR3TScdzhZu5nMkr1Xg/SIDTl/p3ZMH sJZeNDGqFWM9CZzWUJpnQlKVsrblEYnRPnvSbN9xxrMjhgc1weQw7XOw+5mH8OchWgn0 bBpizWKQxjLBnnzcvQjn36w/VifqudlIuNTXfDdDHeIjzAj+zRtYDhL0SuXNndNL61w/ oQsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531a04LrSgzhUkGD3rwOsDsVpNU5n1jTYJMLkZ9MYzYlh0RFEFRJ QbHSxVtzW8WvE4E+7eqQkOuj514avVP3fCEuAOt9RA8hUCNSxw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzflHTm6rGHDR98a3OmuQZzZ/WqaXGI4EPS+xMZGrlTwUUpnFNsLNNthzLsP+kkue6i6lYtFjJ/luaym8fEYzU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4d07:: with SMTP id mw7mr26843787pjb.43.1640708798497; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:26:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Cameron Chaparro Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:26:27 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Error when trying to upgrade packages To: bug-guix@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001d563705d4374970" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::235 (failed) Received-SPF: none client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::235; envelope-from=cameron@cameronchaparro.com; helo=mail-oi1-x235.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:52:19 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --0000000000001d563705d4374970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I'm trying to run "guix upgrade" but I keep getting the following error: guix upgrade: error: integer expected from stream I found this bug (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/51983) that seems like it could be related but it's happening as a result of querying bordeaux.guix rather than ci.guix, in my case. That said, I'm still relatively new to Guix (and haven't used Nix before) so I could be wrong. Is there any chance someone could help me with this? If there's something I can fix, please let me know and I'll look into it. Thanks! Cameron --0000000000001d563705d4374970 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm trying to run "guix upgrade" but I = keep getting the following error:

guix upgrade: error: integ= er expected from stream

I found this bug (<= a href=3D"https://issues.guix.gnu.org/51983">https://issues.guix.gnu.org/51= 983) that seems like it could be related but it's happening as a re= sult of querying bordeaux.guix rather than ci.guix, in my case.
<= br>
That said, I'm still relatively new to Guix (and haven= 9;t used Nix before) so I could be wrong. Is there any chance someone could= help me with this? If there's something I can fix, please let me know = and I'll look into it.

Thanks!

<= /div>
Cameron
--0000000000001d563705d4374970-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 28 13:53:16 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2021 18:53:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47401 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Hb1-0007v3-O8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:53:16 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50910) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Hb0-0007uw-OQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:53:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Hax-0006An-Ej for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:53:14 -0500 Received: from [2a02:c205:2020:6054::1] (port=37150 helo=tobias.gr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Hav-0005yR-I8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:53:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=mplJxb/ntdXcu Yoq1Tq2Q4dWgRGh/MbEcGe+lUc1Kgk=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to: from:references; d=tobias.gr; b=bDsZS7nNv8L2cKcfQV2NbVNpkoFmgPeQuWcHVa u6JQoqOuk8yV0n72IsBbJxRKVeRzqTDMyYWo18NYSHxTtPqC1p7CQGMUfs65oCC+TfA4dT di0psbekHxHmJkJQ3GZjx9NAo3He/mgGgWGVqW+ndX+q18cdWxwhkEfpp518jk7sT8Gc8U 0Yy6lf20yq6ppE4qcumzY9bvGUYdYXFNM1xXnjDCATBuvY39StImv3oQMR3YaMulCOW0FP uopHJPuOCWezSoyJ+rz1v/Edu3OAjKlozBZHl7GZanauFfLidWg27RaYgVzayXm+hiK4XQ VHIUQYL9IMMJRwP1pTsegJcQ== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9e47ab79 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 28 Dec 2021 18:53:04 +0000 (UTC) References: From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Cameron Chaparro Subject: Re: bug#52853: Error when trying to upgrade packages Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:52:03 +0100 In-reply-to: BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <874k6sh87p.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a02:c205:2020:6054::1 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 52853@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cameron, Cameron Chaparro =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > guix upgrade: error: integer expected from stream Please upgrade and restart your guix-daemon and try again:=20 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52797 Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYctdKg0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15GJUA/3xB3vH0AUHWhirj/sfEoRS+qw480mgQOyUrNL0x nNYAAP9JZPXOfPw54peOFiTer1dtEbfCuWsRrUYinhSG800xAQ== =d9N6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 29 18:46:21 2021 Received: (at 52853) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2021 23:46:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50672 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n2ieD-0000vp-0c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 18:46:21 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com ([209.85.210.178]:37747) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n2hQC-00073I-J2 for 52853@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:27:49 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id 8so19735357pfo.4 for <52853@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 14:27:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cameronchaparro-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0DRpRB1g9GQXUd4nhNOipHCPWDwg7S/GPd82R5e/fHs=; b=wh6tPr6mVPMU0OA/nvT+xmofL2vShcYBLd8DuQVZRBz3vjHzG2dwUUlotX1WaIdXqb Dtd1dkWM24Lc7reqKcgEDSP1nozJYzQLIN4hgmHlAQQeTC8UWMfu3vmXVJpgo7T1n6if N7xAY/zrqWkRhC7nzupYqYDNRnr5Op3wH3+B4gKxwOWbiiOXOa/5VO3yq0V5TytoGZXb KulBrt9WQHOycZdpW962QksDOFNl8E/XlQNuNoOaYHfljYOb+iVPZf4P0cOWBEkyCks4 lsh8OxYXsj5lGiDY0TsSlz9nKguF6dOsUA/m7My2X82nl7gccldmgAOxEsunDWrR9EuD 1C8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0DRpRB1g9GQXUd4nhNOipHCPWDwg7S/GPd82R5e/fHs=; b=FzgT2ZaD7lf+PvOZgjbZdrVrlp259+lHjabRqgKipl1W5DQV6P85VHxLPHp2sSlqC1 qWdGkIEhAHmDihC+lbY0Mc6Z42X4SFFS8LesvfWrjNDk9xKe/5skstSBeypVOIy1jjYD jgl4ErWF6Pu7wE2/X+TzHsIlpWyHiqNipLfF/l0btVi9b2F4Duz5QtMw6UdvSOJeC5IY OY0EZAbC7Qpx7Cn9KVx0MEolis2AnicZmxfWNjKeP+LLzx5MbZ6w8BDNqf0joKe7BXwh Hj2dc6EO5pDC4ktZu+7UpvphAzlyhxVLZNVlEDDqTM9F7yr55JCTlYAMXft1Q669fsvG Xy6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Ghc0JaNWvCIiIYePlcQM9I5C1LAjX4KR8/j/gjzIJ2VpF+b+X VL+qhomAuyV3CCg9tylneVpE5CPZMQLFmezA8MI8SiC8bFM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnKl4yd9+qxgaMi9dw7uL1pL8WmjKjyz+Q8BxOxkdRgDbru5C/lGGD5o/VhefdvzFT1cPTjviTRycwT/T4RaQ= X-Received: by 2002:a63:f706:: with SMTP id x6mr25047322pgh.69.1640816862261; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 14:27:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <874k6sh87p.fsf@nckx> In-Reply-To: <874k6sh87p.fsf@nckx> From: Cameron Chaparro Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 16:27:31 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#52853: Error when trying to upgrade packages To: 52853@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003784c505d4507253" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52853 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 18:46:20 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --0000000000003784c505d4507253 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" As it turns out, I was able to narrow the problem down to having 0ad installed and needing to be upgraded. I determined this by manually upgrading everything (running `guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm didn't change anything, nor did force-restarting guix-daemon using `herd`). I'm not sure what the specific issue is - increasing the verbosity level didn't actually give any more output - so I just uninstalled that package. For my part, I think this can be closed (I'm not sure how to do that) but the 0ad package seems to be the one that has that issue. --0000000000003784c505d4507253 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As it turns out, I was able to narrow the problem dow= n to having 0ad installed and needing to be upgraded.

<= div>I determined this by manually upgrading everything (running `guix syste= m reconfigure /etc/config.scm didn't change anything, nor did force-res= tarting guix-daemon using `herd`). I'm not sure what the specific issue= is - increasing the verbosity level didn't actually give any more outp= ut - so I just uninstalled that package.

For my pa= rt, I think this can be closed (I'm not sure how to do that) but the 0a= d package seems to be the one that has that issue.
--0000000000003784c505d4507253-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 31 04:42:05 2021 Received: (at 52853-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2021 09:42:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55106 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n3EQG-0005OF-VY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 04:42:05 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:33897) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n3EQE-0005Nj-FJ for 52853-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 04:42:03 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0C27240105 for <52853-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 10:41:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1640943715; bh=LXErYgF9e3D+WY8MOghx24pAqCwBcSVzH/iuiWSvwXo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=Q2H9VpC12btpVAACGHGWH/gP1cvmoArrn45zty9qx1fzmAjQbYmqRrumSbUW7tP57 oRfrVrqA365V2VSnw1N9bu5xs4DwCPOlo1uiozOrll9ZZQlglJcgiOlavJ2LxqRUGY 1lhBXZYKkStDeSYfwj3LM9o15qFeX+bnjGAPbE04N2W/q1VMNpO+CikzwKknFNHBAu 0dj8O13Np86U3FJhBEZ8BHq8e3DbGRVSnSQQJ7Zgdn2hhP2Vd/xEGWDE2xbSWo/qK0 qJr+d5ymDQ1qIvVjVPu2ETa5JJwJJpeVjkAEGcn6vOpoaI4Rurbk/x4+iTwefB+TTB c92lrp7J+paZw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4JQKst6XsCz6tm5 for <52853-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 10:41:54 +0100 (CET) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: 52853-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: bug#52853: Error when trying to upgrade packages Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 09:39:17 +0000 Message-ID: <87tuepaz6m.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52853-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Closing. I opened bug#52913 for the failing 0ad package. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYc7QYQ8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j8r+gD/fAgoNFQQfQ7s/Dadza4z7v2UMCm6bUrWgy56 itT2qm4BAJ/zVjjlodx2iZuBegQeueY51Lhojvm77vMJC9UO1Jub =UfZn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 16:00:32 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator