GNU bug report logs -
#52851
git grep feature: boolean logic
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 52851 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-grep <at> gnu.org
:
bug#52851
; Package
grep
.
(Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Kevin Connor Arpe <kevinarpe <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-grep <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,
Recently, I was stumped with a difficult grep problem: I needed to filter
files containing more than one regex (think: logical-and). I didn't know
how to do this using only a single invocation of GNU grep. (Please correct
me if I am wrong.)
A bunch of Googling led me to discover that git has a grep sub-command that
implements boolean logic with and/or/not/parens operators. Manpage:
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-grep, Source:
https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/grep.c
At the moment, it's not possible to use git grep very well outside of git
repositories. There are some issues around absolute and relative paths,
plus "git working directory".
Eventually, I settled on writing a crude shell script that wraps GNU grep
to provide similar functionality. However, I am aware of its inefficiency,
as it requires multiple invocations of grep.
Are people aware of this very cool grep feature with boolean logic? I
tried to search the GNU grep message archive, but I didn't see any
discussion about it. I'm curious what the GNU grep team thinks about this
feature.
Kind regards,
Kevin Arpe
Hongkong
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-grep <at> gnu.org
:
bug#52851
; Package
grep
.
(Tue, 28 Dec 2021 15:45:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 52851 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi.
You may want a different tool:
awk '/pattern1/ && /pattern2/' ...
awk '/pattern1/ || /pattern2/' ...
awk '/pattern1/ && !/pattern2/' ...
And so on.
Seems much easier than stuffing boolean logic into grep.
Just a thought,
Arnold
Kevin Connor Arpe <kevinarpe <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently, I was stumped with a difficult grep problem: I needed to filter
> files containing more than one regex (think: logical-and). I didn't know
> how to do this using only a single invocation of GNU grep. (Please correct
> me if I am wrong.)
>
> A bunch of Googling led me to discover that git has a grep sub-command that
> implements boolean logic with and/or/not/parens operators. Manpage:
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-grep, Source:
> https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/grep.c
>
> At the moment, it's not possible to use git grep very well outside of git
> repositories. There are some issues around absolute and relative paths,
> plus "git working directory".
>
> Eventually, I settled on writing a crude shell script that wraps GNU grep
> to provide similar functionality. However, I am aware of its inefficiency,
> as it requires multiple invocations of grep.
>
> Are people aware of this very cool grep feature with boolean logic? I
> tried to search the GNU grep message archive, but I didn't see any
> discussion about it. I'm curious what the GNU grep team thinks about this
> feature.
>
> Kind regards,
> Kevin Arpe
> Hongkong
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
Request was from
Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:40:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 173 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.