From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 20 17:55:36 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2021 22:55:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51682 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzRZA-00014q-L1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:55:36 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzRZ7-00014g-3Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:55:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzRZ6-00014p-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:55:32 -0500 Received: from latitanza.investici.org ([82.94.249.234]:64955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzRZ4-00078L-Fz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:55:32 -0500 Received: from mx3.investici.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by latitanza.investici.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JHw0Z0l58zGp49 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 22:55:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onenetbeyond.org; s=stigmate; t=1640040926; bh=dX+yQ1VwEBzFQckUnlq6Weix1PKAyxvdG7W/5tHW2GI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=rOnrmGT/Nf8yjfMmyvznXg70+yX01j1aQYskDG0N536JU24fMTPU0zYLkLsI5puMX ngZZp0zUBp3hXzfXRSxz+I3xNSYePYTygMhFc9OF4J7Y6rTLJ3eLCJvp/fboRcuafF YjKH25P4qqYqsXWCNXh5Ntfaxf9kfwUHi5eCgxWI= Received: from [82.94.249.234] (mx3.investici.org [82.94.249.234]) (Authenticated sender: dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JHw0Y5FNvzGp3p for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 22:55:25 +0000 (UTC) From: dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 29.0.50; term / use display-buffer Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:55:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87tuf27up1.fsf@onenetbeyond.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=82.94.249.234; envelope-from=dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org; helo=latitanza.investici.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain The function 'term' use actually 'switch-to-buffer'. I think it's better to let users decide where the window will appear with 'display-buffer-alist' or 'display-buffer-base-action', and so, to use 'display-buffer'. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-diff Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-Use-display-buffer-with-term-lisp-term.el-term.patch Content-Description: use_display-buffer >From ae03d8bb6e10027334c2dd6c37bd0e8faf74932c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dal Blazej Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:48:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Use display-buffer with term* lisp/term.el (term): * list/term.el (term): Let users decides which window 'term' will take. --- lisp/term.el | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lisp/term.el b/lisp/term.el index 698bef08b2..5374815c69 100644 --- a/lisp/term.el +++ b/lisp/term.el @@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ commands to use in that buffer. shell-file-name)))) (set-buffer (make-term "terminal" program)) (term-char-mode) - (switch-to-buffer "*terminal*")) + (display-buffer "*terminal*")) (defun term-exec (buffer name command startfile switches) "Start up a process in buffer for term modes. -- 2.30.2 --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 21 05:17:46 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2021 10:17:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzcDK-0003uQ-H5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 05:17:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:33323) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzcDF-0003u8-Pb for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 05:17:45 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id y7so10416736plp.0 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 02:17:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JSP9r2UcxOB/5BYkBIBX/9svuHYBem7RrfBJ7RAVD4k=; b=TmQ6YFFLCxO6N8vinAQPQkXXrJpsCObjQQBNU355H+O/NKLtWF8fkjReSHwO0imqb2 C21CQGcq38z06k4VCekoL25/uBfSg+ON4LwmypktJNO/Q1UgRD8Gs/sNQJNP2r0sZ3F3 j8CQvTxNKLZFXLeU7y78FHLQQ5ha2jr63ochY0qpZT4ZBakSf90WNTENn1bvw0PL9i+P c1Hoey5cgHEhoEIfzTbB7AJkJxc2XXmntwSAs6GRDXf5Kt5CTlXjb5+tKtjNKuZrMSx9 kQx4Uij1hoZAhORYPR5SwKGo+cEajTHA7Eymq67+NfbdQFNEZXbZ2Jay/dxPEib3ylwq SOdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vAACpP6DMpI8W5pmJWMCtgGUWcRnikwl4tx1W2KOfR+8Lg/xM p0F2vGzK1ZmM5IGriSQJT3IO40hn3aKi2sreb+3rfuS4 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKU6sgF5kft2jYF5lTP6x5UaTz7U+uMkjMBaJtVBJymk3oNSbRiFOzUjavtrzsLyjV7eQtOD3pjYGyB4gMhPA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7615:b0:148:db50:6b9f with SMTP id k21-20020a170902761500b00148db506b9fmr2339940pll.102.1640081855636; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 02:17:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 02:17:35 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 02:17:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: control message for bug #52688 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) tags 52688 + patch severity 52688 wishlist quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 21 05:48:39 2021 Received: (at 52688) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2021 10:48:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52489 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzchD-0000sZ-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 05:48:39 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36360) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzch9-0000sG-8o for 52688@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 05:48:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=H1NYQGU4tssKKMP+1M3Sdyvv1P66iyN7Oes/bxIzz6o=; b=reMB/02PwkxLBJpb/IN280ID7J 0Wm6G0+ruHe43DxrD8Ct+Gi6q8J9C9l0NAWPS66Pnm8gm7nexTwmIfNSm34Z8DSWv3obulYz5EJjM NC2lzAc1Q/Pqv5odw3MEvOAeHkH84u8ETJXVrENNVSIMaiJej6YB5Eq66qpRZn/QqM+U=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzch0-0005Uj-3R; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 11:48:28 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org Subject: Re: bug#52688: 29.0.50; term / use display-buffer References: <87tuf27up1.fsf@onenetbeyond.org> X-Now-Playing: Laurie Freelove's _Songs From The Nineline_: "Broken" Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 11:48:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87tuf27up1.fsf@onenetbeyond.org> (dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org's message of "Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:55:22 +0100") Message-ID: <87bl1ai68b.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org writes: > The function 'term' use actually 'switch-to-buffer'. I think it's better > to let users decide where the window will appear with > 'display-buffer-alist' or 'display-buffer-base-action', and so, to [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52688 Cc: 52688@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org writes: > The function 'term' use actually 'switch-to-buffer'. I think it's better > to let users decide where the window will appear with > 'display-buffer-alist' or 'display-buffer-base-action', and so, to use > 'display-buffer'. [...] > - (switch-to-buffer "*terminal*")) > + (display-buffer "*terminal*")) This would change the behaviour considerably from the current one, so I don't think this would fly. But we could use `pop-to-buffer-same-window', I guess? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 21 05:48:45 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2021 10:48:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52492 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzchJ-0000st-O2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 05:48:45 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36374) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzchI-0000sX-8J for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 05:48:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Wq/ddJHGegh5byUgMZuRz9xLQTvBcBpPwxz23n2o/TE=; b=EZhKmiB+KdbML4klBudIsqtfug 1BeAhNukdyJ0DHKqJHQIRTuxbS8ecdzlXlaEKVkCRgrr7VF4+WddHnPqcPNNL2YdfN2y9QBUvsDHy sMkTHYtahvle3LPxvCYFPWiVsQUSbqJw9QqW2e5vjZ5FWFRK9/1H4XVZc6xDkpu12jCk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzch9-0005Uq-TQ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 11:48:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 11:48:35 +0100 Message-Id: <87a6gui67w.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #52688 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 52688 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 52688 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 22 07:01:40 2021 Received: (at 52688) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2021 12:01:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56975 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n00JQ-00026u-F7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:01:40 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48302) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n00JO-00026f-IF for 52688@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:01:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=H7kw/QSL6MN3ETCKgWhZBNHITOwiCCTp2YwAKPw2l3U=; b=tcbsSrxuWxN0oRktTWyAsz/6sJ HPs5rYOv4cBzzHQhpoOsVOFiwjhttRjeWnDYvbC8BWQy7rx5l12Uw8HJYtVAdTi0YJyPlxnvIgfLq ElISnilEV8jYvck8IvuI8fZ3ftFRz6nf6NpfRqL0PBsINnusLZ/XTBT5dfsCdBcIzaAg=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n00JG-0008Al-4Y; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:01:32 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org Subject: Re: bug#52688: 29.0.50; term / use display-buffer References: <87tuf27up1.fsf@onenetbeyond.org> <87bl1ai68b.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee65svov.fsf@onenetbeyond.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAGFBMVEX9/Pjc1dCwp6GS hniOb2BVUUIjKB////9Z1785AAAAAWJLR0QHFmGI6wAAAAd0SU1FB+UMFgs2NnAsLt4AAAGMSURB VDjLzZPdcaQwDIAxmdyz5UzueS1oIMgUkNhsAcFyBbH7LyEysCxkX3MzJ/Bg9OnHSKJp/gfRoJtG llJHbavNxdinBrV5giNQFVyMlgvsCQBYBVpbUPoUqoF6a1WXVuoWDSTCpTXWtCCuaPRu3kqCtmps g80FQd8zgAQHDapu1Q7+vSgwuEs3UEdEvoLXXB4kL4DPupIyL+Dv8poePRZQQrg+gCUHT1w2r3TL sZgwhVWfP/B6BHFw/v2F5qnvcNxAtYxTcAExFY5E7gCYYwijHDx/yaYcj8ucUk1bLa6H44oPr4/A Hq874KoSh09plGPf30NVUMpskSz0YajgeQcpk8HxHYH97iF5xeMTwRASpVjBn5pB4meu7UCHk+Mb 2CrnB+OmGeee+Qz4TZo5Dtj5HyASAvReOpxPQEovn9HT0HVlP+4aigeDHXaOcp3FZy7bOOQ000DW +FBWkLYWyefkGD5wdryC+5jEILWc4riBtE9WniqJHBZwGDjJz7Xwi0d7H1ALN/nVn+Ab0Z+3/cTJ 8a8AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMTItMjJUMTE6NTQ6NTQrMDA6MDDdcZSdAAAAJXRF WHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTEyLTIyVDExOjU0OjU0KzAwOjAwrCwsIQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Laura Jean's _Our Swan Song_: "Our Swan Song" Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:01:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ee65svov.fsf@onenetbeyond.org> (dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org's message of "Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:40:32 +0100") Message-ID: <87tuf0g86f.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org writes: > Yes, I forgot about the selection of the > window. `pop-to-buffer-same-window' seems better. OK; I've now done that in Emacs 29. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52688 Cc: 52688@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) dal-blazej@onenetbeyond.org writes: > Yes, I forgot about the selection of the > window. `pop-to-buffer-same-window' seems better. OK; I've now done that in Emacs 29. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 22 07:01:13 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2021 12:01:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56972 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n00Iz-00026B-8C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:01:13 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48290) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n00Ix-00025p-SV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:01:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lfeCOh3TrjltanXmllRKUvAGg+bmjfdMB/Vi/7sDK4g=; b=bAMHM9vijR70QgcbFjl75GEqxp snXsu0DhKXOaN2C9Bb9tAH+xBf4LrmCfOkprjAHRBjAxwe5NrBY+3DqtcYdDOh7+eul+Gtx2uwuc8 LKkBVZXWZ5NH3OJkoGFKwfF85gRK84EIbcnokzIltjYW8zIzClfVH5/MC99EDuQgWVuA=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n00Ip-0008Ad-Dn for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:01:05 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:01:02 +0100 Message-Id: <87y24cg875.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #52688 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 52688 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 52688 29.1 quit From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:57:32 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator