From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:06:27 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#52667 <52667@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#52667 <52667@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv Reply-To: bug#52667 <52667@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:06:27 +0000 retitle 52667 System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv reassign 52667 guix submitter 52667 Vivien Kraus severity 52667 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 19 15:36:09 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 20:36:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48301 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2uf-0005yy-MV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:09 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50744) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2ue-0005yq-Ho for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2ue-0001GB-Bc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:08 -0500 Received: from [2a00:5881:4008:2810::309] (port=49478 helo=planete-kraus.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2ua-0004Qz-Q6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:08 -0500 Received: from planete-kraus.eu (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by planete-kraus.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id cf3edba7 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:35:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=planete-kraus.eu; h=from :to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=dkim; bh=00qDg8dJZcdtu//Lg/Q3jNeCKck=; b=Ar2N0cl71Z33lmvGiP6p+1okxnxe w8YRb3pyDRiIog6FkfWstM4jcvr1KD5wP7iMc5e+ZDCkuzv73v1I06Udoxj1QOuZ /NUmMwXHAdvGs6Avi5Hmu9KXPENONfSPwjqo2T1kzx/XChy1tLvX3vtU4uJugwty zXg+a5v1W0PjXz4= Received: by planete-kraus.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2a7b8bdf (TLSv1.3:AEAD-CHACHA20-POLY1305-SHA256:256:NO); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:35:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Vivien Kraus To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:35:52 +0100 Message-ID: <871r28uyc7.fsf@planete-kraus.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:5881:4008:2810::309 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:5881:4008:2810::309; envelope-from=vivien@planete-kraus.eu; helo=planete-kraus.eu X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear guix, On master, I can=E2=80=99t reconfigure my system, because the linux-modules= .drv fails with the following error: Backtrace: 17 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/bvjcb7jbwlky0czin8p66949mil?") In ice-9/eval.scm: 619:8 16 (_ #f) 626:19 15 (_ #) 293:34 14 (_ #(# #)) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 586:29 13 (map1 _) 586:29 12 (map1 _) 586:29 11 (map1 _) 586:29 10 (map1 _) 586:29 9 (map1 _) 586:29 8 (map1 _) 586:29 7 (map1 _) 586:29 6 (map1 _) 586:29 5 (map1 _) 586:29 4 (map1 _) 586:29 3 (map1 _) 586:29 2 (map1 _) 586:17 1 (map1 ("simplefb" "pata_acpi" "pata_atiixp" "isci" "?" ?)) In gnu/build/linux-modules.scm: 257:5 0 (_) gnu/build/linux-modules.scm:257:5: kernel module not found "simplefb" "/gnu= /store/1ai7mxw5ad58ic9slxsjzsxaryi5wksp-linux-libre-5.10.87/lib/modules" The top of the backtrace is this file, /gnu/store/bvjcb7jbwlky0czin8p66949milhvrql-linux-modules-builder: (begin (use-modules (gnu build linux-modules) (guix build utils) (srfi srfi-1) (srfi srfi-26)) (define module-dir (string-append "/gnu/store/1ai7mxw5ad58ic9slxsjzsxaryi5wksp-linux-libre-5.10.87" "/lib/modules")) (define modules (let* ((lookup (cut find-module-file module-dir <>)) (modules (map lookup (quote ("ahci" "usb-storage" "uas" "usbhid" "hid-generic" "hid-apple" "dm-crypt" "xts" "serpent_generic" "wp512" "nls_iso8859-1" "framebuffer_coreboot" "simplefb" "pata_acpi" "pata_atiixp" "isci" "virtio_pci" "virtio_balloon" "virtio_blk" "virtio_net" "virtio_console" "virtio-rng"))))) (append modules (recursive-module-dependencies modules #:lookup-module lookup)))) (define (maybe-uncompress file) (cond ((string-contains file ".ko.gz") (invoke "/gnu/store/9q9z91mvc1r3h8zmi135msv3j1dgv2js-gzip-1.10/bin/gunzip" file)))) (mkdir ((@ (guile) getenv) "out")) (for-each (lambda (module) (let ((out-module (string-append ((@ (guile) getenv) "out") "/" (basename module)))) (format #t "copying '~a'...~%" module) (copy-file module out-module) (maybe-uncompress out-module))) (delete-duplicates modules)) (write-module-name-database ((@ (guile) getenv) "out"))) This is the linux-related part of my system configuration: (operating-system (kernel linux-libre-lts) (kernel-arguments `(,@%default-kernel-arguments "modprobe.blacklist=3Damdgpu,radeon")) =E2=80=A6) Best regards, Vivien --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAEBCAAdFiEEq4yIHjMvkliPpwQnO7C8EjLYuCwFAmG/l6kACgkQO7C8EjLY uCw0zgwAkiMu4gysFcrrelt2a5I0cKfE2rjHi3LQbNNTnDks44FhlcrAoOHnmCZD 377LGQDalumTOQJXUb1EpHIIjl0JxgYQMnikNT0zXxnKfOQXNFk/3wfHDv0GFUrP pEHuOnULc11tuYQK55vi9FTH7SNn6cZ1rtWfRpzV5Pfa5jEeXd4lvmjQGJU6BFsN 6ZxtLkKX0pb1V8gNwsicaQ8DhB758fwkm6MPak3NjjBttWzPKwhs8Q0lQJ+Mn6rL cmvQAd9jluuE65XrPPYADZJLTuSuMCg18ppZQtT1hD4KlneB6jwQ9SVhk33aHDso LBH6A1QWjW+tdCxn9tz4e+t5+9yVxjGShRZDQ0AxGymzk/34aiH+0b23PTE286If uFrJcpHlX9flw/UfhntLyihfzCbynlPyrYd+Rg6r2XG+jKtINlapjbvXFlqldpxh 8Y7xg4CYb2j9kiKOy7sGhL9lspb63npy9tpI56c6XdcKcF/PPi9Be+VyhwvvHgu0 5UHLa0+l =pQ0X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 21 17:14:18 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2021 22:14:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55923 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mznOk-0004tl-5Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:14:18 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:57814) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mznOg-0004tZ-Px for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:14:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=g/TVgNyk0vxG3 gtWr2VkK2/p4MSO2ny8SIdYxC7wa3U=; h=date:to:from; d=tobias.gr; b=eltE8O DY0Xt7HOurAMUGKyyigLKMZDHIJKcxXc0OTaF4iIo4reH2yvJ8yYNhcmF8/mdePAzjZ0Q9 I9bVDiOCniPuK/2D536niE0mWpKAqGXapmmlLcQr6K3MYcXj0qNDgiIQZUtsCEdAKl/utV oxm9tJSy1NOa7p20tl51cuuF0AuJeBLCykh0hWgiGm/kGOpP4dUxjab68MJo3cdJ30QA4R L7Zi4XoF2Vr7nus04ORv0vgQFRWCMSTT1wOMccZRdCuXFQvfYSQRvWp6cp6vVQ64mqv7MZ wbSZxuZbpuDeE+GFeUhSABi7h9KJKhwpNwZpfePv741fcFxeXOYnId/g== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d53d82d6 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:14:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: GNU bug tracker automated control server Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 23:14:42 +0100 BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87y24dehb1.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 52667 52719 Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.241.217.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) merge 52667 52719 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 21 17:50:10 2021 Received: (at 52667) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2021 22:50:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mznxR-0008BC-SK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:50:10 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:57824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mznxP-0008B0-Os for 52667@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:50:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=yQKPJOG/Uo/pX hi1bYYUHhSo8+YoesKcYViYWfnb7Ss=; h=date:subject:to:from; d=tobias.gr; b=LI0dEWn9QkzBMHZxKbnGCVDgH6wgtXUnEQOSX4Dr0VypACL0mIccE1MEr+jXb6mg8DbX z+IKl7WJWyJbHAjYcoQ4Nj9SNcPUcBIk4+E7KxB3LgaiXHqSrI74OWIj2VrJuUN/VpyVPR PhU91o6du7yV3x1QFUlj7xHbbsppz+3ufAt9F3bIGCwZt12xr1K9dW55xcBjoH9TVOSf8+ s57kOAQUnhJn3V5ubevWmj1ZzN2tnecUNE+OHtIkyoAcrIRwe8MM4m3nsicfAblPdMt2Yc utqepA83pKrg4KNe/eRt4a+Q0WmbaJgVArsi/spy4RNh4b8inggRElFvezIzeydg== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 27053f0a (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <52667@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 22:50:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: 52667@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 23:38:44 +0100 BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87tuf1efn8.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52667 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vivien, Thanks for the report! Sorry it took me a while to get back to=20 you. As discussed in #guix, an immediate work-around is: (initrd-modules ;; This cannot be built as a module for linux-libre-lts. ((@ (srfi srfi-1) delete) "simplefb" %base-initrd-modules)) I'm not sure what to do going forward. I see two reasonable=20 solutions. Perhaps there are more, and I welcome suggestions. One is to provide a separate %base-initrd-modules-lts list that's=20 equivalent to the snippet above. It's=E2=80=A6 not great, but then=20 linux-libre-lts itself isn't documented and people still seem to=20 find it. If someone were to document it, they could also add a=20 note about modules. A more straightforward route is to simply build in simplefb even=20 for kernels 5.15 and beyond. Apart from an (unmeasured) size=20 increase of the base image, the main drawback here is that we lose=20 our long-standing CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM=3Dm due to a conflict: =2D CONFIG_DRM_GEM_SHMEM_HELPER=3Dy =2D CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM=3Dm + # CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM unset tristate: Simple framebuffer driver =2D CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE=3Dm + CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE=3Dy tristate: Simple framebuffer support When preparing I considered=20 this a regression and hence bad, but maybe nobody cares=E2=80=A6? Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYcJaSw0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15PBABAN9s31O1VVHFIBLhO3nc1ccrq/qjUW8dVUC+pWGL vtjqAQDafVjv0uQsFH813IZidEZmIkdbLF9Eei2Q74SJEZAFAA== =4Gzy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 21 18:07:19 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2021 23:07:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56108 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzoE3-00009a-I8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:07:19 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34380) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzoDz-00009P-1U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:07:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44704) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzoDy-0008U3-Sg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:07:14 -0500 Received: from [2a02:c205:2020:6054::1] (port=35816 helo=tobias.gr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzoDl-0005wj-CN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:07:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=XkBXw8GN2fZJV Ob5+x8w6mw8m0IFZdfulmceAliOteU=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:from: references; d=tobias.gr; b=FzDY47hbQr4zYx3/2p3prVLn42/DIx09NcVe/Y5zA4c WRYcTu3WllImTh4qQ0CEBsP2XJZBv8M0Fuun8NZMrCrRzCfRSGP4fokIOA+dxOU7ok6R8+ XZX+JCF/EBj64wPojr6qIyMRqE6AEpGPQGkv9Bi4vLDm5HalcOzS4mRV3tfuzgvFNueDGh Qf/0xM+nahdiN+FYscrcbCbrb8snlKPEC6FVvU68YM4MlkyQNFKUt/XqYwT29x5ZyxjNEr le36zu/b68VAYc9hlG3zB9VaJ3htn4I7ckmRF+mV33AZYpJgytsWl1Z0ugBDq+Z/j1W7n2 xSN7EFjPAqFQZn1sj2Q== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id dc68a645 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 23:06:55 +0000 (UTC) References: <871r28uyc7.fsf@planete-kraus.eu> <87tuf1efn8.fsf@nckx> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: bug#52667: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:32 +0100 In-reply-to: <87tuf1efn8.fsf@nckx> BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87pmppeev5.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a02:c205:2020:6054::1 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -2 X-Spam_score: -0.3 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 52667@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC= =9A > I see two reasonable solutions. By the way, I think a better solution longer-term is to merge=20 these tightly-coupled kernel attributes into a single object: (kernel (linux-libre-configuration (package linux-libre-lts =E2=80=A6) (modules-needed-for-boot =E2=80=A6) =E2=80=A6)) Naming aside, something like that. A variant like linux-libre-lts-kernel could then be a coherent &=20 self-contained whole. This has bugged me for a long time,=20 actually=E2=80=A6 Thoughts? T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYcJePg0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15PTQBAMlEphUCev8/+WlTD+A4/fIvWf7difg/MOKmqAB1 UwyfAP9cc5AQ9SkxtMNbLeYCeJRpXhlXfKlKwd8LuK/+KuGfBg== =ddOj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 21 18:11:52 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2021 23:11:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzoIS-0000G2-3S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:11:52 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:51365) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzoIO-0000Fn-Nf for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:11:51 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA805C00C8; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:11:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:11:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=WVD1vk+Ry3kb6I+CRBREwNiEA0yNZKAbk50vfZEt8uo=; b=IpdUu2asx72A 0DE0Lq79/uI1VSTjLkoiNODqNpu79swKBtVWqe7+CdeXWmsFRkkEWFprNHLtOE72 WKfx4715fs1bkSdebmnyxhaCA8yQTzUNliVIt/yn7u9qyZ2DRlr501gCRzQHatuF t3rHARr3aKvADqlwq0of1cexdjih57M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=WVD1vk+Ry3kb6I+CRBREwNiEA0yNZKAbk50vfZEt8 uo=; b=XwL4BH+LQ3AgvUDZQ3qfMfPQAgrQjNo1BEtJYAYgaKfG1LlNU2HwDGFUi 6qH8x1+7cW2lzFrm6Co2/lIn8yWQzt1yKUWGCnm1ZiytyXee5X/gK8ePhKepHkJZ 5r6TEMXVUdlkStQRkOgzcAW8P1+ipTzxUHUDsEh72UPrCGk8hRksp9cE8Lm9sMUJ QukMd6v44TcwFORYlMR21KwD9uhTABJ5PbQs0ddaSvLrN+A38Qs4t2R145D9m5uo S9yV9xnOM6Ql+lLwwhVdG/emJslrMaLJOEdhCS8G5/Rm08iBYiOiqojo3i/geY7h htxxtL7xeZ2s3bRwQqhjslEo8gkuw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddthedgtdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfgmhhpthihuchsuhgsjhgvtghtucdluddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvkfggtggusehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhl rghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpe fhjeeigfefvedvfeetheegledtkeevuddtgedtudeiteehteegvdefffduffefffenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrg hmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:11:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:11:41 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 52719 52667 Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [66.111.4.29 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [66.111.4.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) merge 52719 52667 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 22 13:28:45 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2021 18:28:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59728 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n06M1-0004WM-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:28:45 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:58400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n06Lt-0004Ve-H6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:28:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n06Lt-0005R0-5w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:28:37 -0500 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:40495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n06Lr-0004EI-4q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:28:36 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6D93200D98; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:28:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:28:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=KZJHitudH8Lb8GPOsrnswLBK fMuTWwjQJ6V78sm8jJA=; b=dkmcoTWBGoluDzemtdIGeW2/PRVgFp3Fm+gmxNJe YGNsgPI9vY82qcxU31uNw9xNokTfQCNFDT9nL6NqxwiE6cTZh3eKhqTO2BCcjdIi o/hUFZND+00EOr1PWMVhTPUWpI3i8hQ9zXK497KfRay0RhnTAHH0ObNMTin5BjBT pBU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=KZJHit udH8Lb8GPOsrnswLBKfMuTWwjQJ6V78sm8jJA=; b=LnVEruwOqBy5e1Bx74faCA zOt+xCbnPPENvuzRtwwOoyzjClHiSDCl9pk4hIjlMfhtHx9piYRcXRc45XmFDBOe RFLJiNgNLe6WeaW0t/e7E5IIXKR/CKgrvkLvq3vYYE7XibYabAbNV+Vfois+cJHJ qdLXLr0KiAi7mc6nNGc9he1HUL826YU+PRbHPMkLVSGEnFqtf8DIXZAjQFuULI8D VdFFOFKkvu6sz5izcQdpypbRPj74eHmd9ZfWkEeApoa5ZqnkP7kPKeFXuQdP8UNn 9FZPj8O+WdEfYa4rf0XOolhaVgh/Ye2Ri4LfJm7NaFXd6xFiEm93ulWaZCDr5tkA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddtiedguddtiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheff vefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:28:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:28:30 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: Re: bug#52667: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv Message-ID: References: <871r28uyc7.fsf@planete-kraus.eu> <87tuf1efn8.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tuf1efn8.fsf@nckx> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.21; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 52667@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:38:44PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > (initrd-modules > ;; This cannot be built as a module for linux-libre-lts. > ((@ (srfi srfi-1) delete) "simplefb" %base-initrd-modules)) Sorry if this question has already been answered, but is the problem specific to linux-libre-lts? Or linux-libre-5.10? Or all linux-libre packages aside from the 5.15 series? I'm inclined to just revert the commit that introduced the regression until we have a better solution... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 22 14:25:35 2021 Received: (at 52667) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2021 19:25:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59756 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n07F1-00067u-83 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:25:35 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:57986) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n07Ex-00067k-SX for 52667@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:25:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=7CaAqYktYKBXR bqU2HWJuiqAbsxcwvY3a2wTtLsP8f4=; h=references:in-reply-to:subject:cc: to:from:date; d=tobias.gr; b=G/zZQBMf73obJ/hNI572wPDr2+HF1RvOjxRVYPaXC 4lPjXsGuFT9Xy6SfAUkWMhQJ4p/5Z+nX0foczbmsN2A+fooGpT4Si0zwEOrT908iCjv83d 384Q10WOp/dQL7P0PcOb/oV9zgdUxWD82jPMHhWh4BQcyfQ/Z5y2zhONIj5M6d7e22bVwo CQA/60um8GLII3Tb5P1uB6fp5fugzzls0tnO9b0k0rxjorziHA2ULnR7Nom1faiqaedZMg M/CnVzYR6foBGaQSYrEQr6CkzM/L1HoN4QFKZAvKjscBb2J79/ExkNz/ohPL6nByyGqc1J I/HFUJCnmCxAXjXsx3fpg== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 382d6315; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:25:28 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:25:27 +0100 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#52667: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv In-Reply-To: References: <871r28uyc7.fsf@planete-kraus.eu> <87tuf1efn8.fsf@nckx> Message-ID: <2e16e98b78683bf669bfc3fa26224a39@tobias.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52667 Cc: 52667@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Leo, On 2021-12-22 19:28, Leo Famulari wrote: > Or all linux-libre packages aside from the 5.15 series? This. > I'm inclined to just revert the commit that introduced the regression > until we have a better solution... I think this is merely trading one regression for another, IMO *slightly* nastier one. And no, I'm not personally affected by this bug :-) What about my third suggestion? > build in simplefb even for kernels 5.15 and beyond Your approval as definitely-not-our-linux-libre-maintainer would be one of the major factors. If you have no opinion, I doubt anyone else will object. Realistically, the only way to tease out any unknown users out there is to try it. Kind regards, T G-R Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 22 14:27:32 2021 Received: (at 52667) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2021 19:27:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n07Gu-0006As-JB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:27:32 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:57988) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n07Gt-0006Ai-5Z for 52667@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:27:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=1wEIEvA+UBwHl sdlCA+Hfwa8+3EtO5ef82Iwn1452zQ=; h=references:in-reply-to:subject:cc: to:from:date; d=tobias.gr; b=AI2Jbo91MUOvG8TzrCqN8CNI+gnT2+vpTgDl4aoV2 aaJz48A45wuqYzS6+PxAnO5PoQ5vUxkOwsPm9tl45IqLJPiPJR7p8NVEGOj/OBTtMsTbFR qcKja+hbnpOcU+/0oBkQEm3USimiy+6scZ1MPWUifcHqs4KOpwKrdJ0X3n0jR5b1X/Ybfw ufdfPe+7G1yL/fTdANUdBXRneV6hYdiQgZzQ4lOGNSuZT1H6tSmBCuLjk1p/84nsahpN7u y88rzSk188EiAQaDgnWXnxHPiPUmqScN3b+W4Yf/LAFPeNf3OGAgtYAgftkM8NsAqscQcA xjoP7Qc1aOLhiIcSQVCcQ== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a8debd56; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:27:29 +0100 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#52667: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv In-Reply-To: <2e16e98b78683bf669bfc3fa26224a39@tobias.gr> References: <871r28uyc7.fsf@planete-kraus.eu> <87tuf1efn8.fsf@nckx> <2e16e98b78683bf669bfc3fa26224a39@tobias.gr> Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52667 Cc: 52667@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > unknown users of the conflicting DRM module, I mean. Kind regards, T G-R Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 22 15:11:49 2021 Received: (at 52667) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2021 20:11:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59787 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n07xl-0007Iz-KO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:49 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:33855) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n07xj-0007In-UT for 52667@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:48 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F84532000CC; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=Qm5c75U+/odEmRbVKRQxN6yN yadOt/hWkZInGLSFZbM=; b=kes4Hgnzz3Nq3LygUA3rkOvSQ2hIQMYBamR1PtRD wI3RCcqGeDdVh+WLK8rOLzj9YZHECYDLPTVH+bw70SQrT/dEQ0iF49Evlmssi9Mx sab876UNutqt3ScH7BfxAkUGdELtPRs9N2vhcWQjyeTvwTHtu4GV7s1xbcU1svxG w8s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Qm5c75 U+/odEmRbVKRQxN6yNyadOt/hWkZInGLSFZbM=; b=C6K6kSiJZByzIvDnIQezf0 aAAFgdAFV1NwQ1hIT1ob6MrXQY2CBBHlOSfB907NG2lAG2JpUK9m8YrYzVaK4WSS IvRe3VnjqBeaYq6FZAT+p0qHRVCg363Ehu/QGrI4SKDb+yWyNla/H2CfmPJkxb5r KTmGzlOtvDIN6hHOm+5Mue03mbXFQ8sDmqvsvI/AByY+x7mnCAL8vHiXCrYhwPns NMIUMCWtaJTJsxfpYJZM1NuV4U1K6khoYLVonGkZKnAxa6geTt8147sgC2wFn00q I0TfGwHOvi3e4EPru2BcrzT8x9fBlit88OJ6Qvy6FnAuailfQ6upB8Sfd/MEmCrg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddtiedguddvkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhf eufeeivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffevgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:38 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: bug#52667: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv Message-ID: References: <871r28uyc7.fsf@planete-kraus.eu> <87tuf1efn8.fsf@nckx> <2e16e98b78683bf669bfc3fa26224a39@tobias.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2e16e98b78683bf669bfc3fa26224a39@tobias.gr> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52667 Cc: 52667@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 08:25:27PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > This. Well, I guess this episode demonstrates that people are using 5.15, 5.10, and not much else. It's useful information. > > I'm inclined to just revert the commit that introduced the regression > > until we have a better solution... > > I think this is merely trading one regression for another, IMO *slightly* > nastier one. And no, I'm not personally affected by this bug :-) Okay. From my point of view, things were fine until we added the simplefb module. So that was the regression. > > Your approval as definitely-not-our-linux-libre-maintainer would be one of > the major factors. If you have no opinion, I doubt anyone else will object. > Realistically, the only way to tease out any unknown users out there is to > try it. I have no opinion :) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 28 19:50:46 2021 Received: (at 52667) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2021 00:50:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47772 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n2NAz-0006US-Jt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:50:46 -0500 Received: from mail-oln040092065024.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.65.24]:58242 helo=EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n2KvB-0006y7-Ae for 52667@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:26:20 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OHVOQtKpQUdjaGcQ/OLbslErizA3muUx0r4NfEOe5YggWeSjr2UQMOT55xLIea2Iud2/GKDgbAjwXT+rtOJh5IpiWnU3N/rH9pfgx9rRTRoqTBk4UkcI9mli9rUw+Wyo45AwLWir2bvCeYRYlRovvwbRA7u/I54HWPm8kLXD2VpomOXnZlqjWJdMncvBKqWpQ12eZEfojEiPtinApxuSPwAiYrVHZtN3aj6WnjzAzcBlUp3Tw7bm/7fBb4R7/kI32CiHcc0gCn0dluV2d3GGw2nlKs+5A0FoNFwxSh2YxrvKhfT8e1EbkSuDaS+/qNsNmJHtzfZWEPmMedr5qoKlgA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=g2RcutvYc1nPniyF6QF14lQ0/l18eC8554uFFhh01WI=; b=ViIHRqudkcwS5b10L3tNswSJ7XQBlK7DXgYrU7rF0241tBKBqxhUevabwO6bA+ItAfHv+7uq6GG/cpatjkdbvq363L0JrTAQjvdoinweDo5YAbPbWZwRblqE7z5xArsfq/PwUIzJMpIhawBXIVa4xHipdxrWWL/R/97SHv558q6zP5mjdj9u+WvXOKV6ZhUfikGs2/Cm6KZNoW93an2iLBkjVxoYlNR8Q8lHUpbwFbvgIKmE7XV+xBDZvBUOrug4yTKYyv+1YA6/5oN5vhKyzFv79+D1ugFDivgMQaTf7wCnrzc+70m4H7hViqNq8jQT4TUt7d/j7oP4pm2p48g9Qg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=g2RcutvYc1nPniyF6QF14lQ0/l18eC8554uFFhh01WI=; b=hdIv9IYMZL0JGAybHO1MD6qWLAgElJKG5a+qEshQtbJHKraQhI7r8v34WeVwvCfTAAfYZyfoNGIo/lbBfebOqF9DBxJfdaWBEixEXlEZooK25ZpOHi3zSft7XjFfS+tdPMVmmYkjKfBCDdkEyMWcryAmRXKBPUcBy+NR/lMtPVpDoYBwN13ySSF6bO8NFMEWTTUv+qvEOjxKBkSkR4hpanbkBhIa0yOmOIHX9F+eAINPZXpzFTJCFJWoH4ZEsKGNuTDPx5tvcaihENEQDKJzXMoxTQudO5m3Q2B6Km7rIwo9y9ie2kYY7ujd/Eno5cyXKfIEENUok/A8wfYZ3hLwjg== Received: from AM0PR02MB5763.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:18b::23) by AM0PR02MB5763.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:18b::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4823.18; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 22:26:10 +0000 Received: from AM0PR02MB5763.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c04:2f9c:b10d:a24d]) by AM0PR02MB5763.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c04:2f9c:b10d:a24d%6]) with mapi id 15.20.4823.024; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 22:26:10 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 23:26:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 To: 52667@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv Content-Language: fr From: "Julien L." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TMN: [/pbcbxfskFf4STI2vOOyyofMAHgYgwcX] X-ClientProxiedBy: AM3PR07CA0076.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:207:4::34) To AM0PR02MB5763.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:18b::23) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <2f161cf4-f2e0-2a97-8f9f-090c07eccd43@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: c7ebf7dd-b1b5-4dd0-457e-08d9ca510c12 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM0PR02MB5763:EE_ X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: gSjCm4nmGeL1mkp5g0R5eBYRu9ooj7maNr0RlvBpGA/aFWXvzkO0RtdW65oqnggop92zek7KuMWZgYVmHrHkCKhLYBJkWeAZlUu1tncLJyAPQ7MyxgQ1mlPuCt39y2JDY5g+Z+WqcyX1cMtRj7Ne11HoagmXxMt3utI74tyu/gArtPyDBa7vHUiOvKX7ZTNyDvIzzhdXbXj5fHTqKn4lraMEzrIo5uYUJEj7FOpSHRAxNxN6KaFtHTcRRL89T6/74TXkAiYfDIugcH/wzDC+hUqOnLAM/A23+c3wNFty0yd1D4nBV6KjhQVRMsyr0eH6uq2V5F61Oel7Jd4S62s5DZzznVSbFBEdywrU72huyQw/ce7a+lF8CA0QzaSUZ58ZcvR30iAn8WmRN8sUaGUh+UpgSBgSbubf9kfvkKInT3dM4d+cZN0LOX+X2tDq5xo2pkS0iHEWV3IhNbKdgQw5qBmXzhl+0/7wjLWce+OhXAI1OVt/ZXXY849FB6tU92N8IaWBPvgu9lJJhh2tGwHzworCmToa8nx4fy4UwFFK3W8CC0B9jKFxjrjN0t6Rg7+ZrEskdOOscaDTPTld8pTfig== X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?utf-8?B?ZDZvdDZveDNpaDZUblpqMjFkOGNUc3lVUHplRWUzS1NhTHNBNlR6dGRDazVK?= =?utf-8?B?VlZLd1d1MVBRc2RLNXRhbURuRVBkalVnQk5yOThVZFNTYXFGOEVNaFAvWi82?= =?utf-8?B?VCtMMm52azZrN1FuWXhkY24xZk5wSEloV2FtYlU2UzBFdEdDK1lCRTFaWkR2?= =?utf-8?B?dVdYL2w5QUI1QS9nMzVmYzhLN1EvNTBtSEg0cUN1ZGRwenlScTFkMHpmcTJ0?= =?utf-8?B?MkxnYndYRG8rR1JKY0N4LzhCZ3NtTGJ2OWNHL2hqb3YrN0s2SVAxVHZJZkpi?= =?utf-8?B?L1gvU3lhclVoUDdrOHROMjcwdGxtenEvVGhHd3lOUkR6VWo2VDJaSTJQOStk?= =?utf-8?B?SjJ2ZkFLUEpkeDVSS21UNmUyQXBYVGJMSG1vOUNnejZzWkFJUm4zRXVBanQ1?= =?utf-8?B?c0xkZHBrRHFrdzk0MnBkaWh5RUJTZ2lQVkNlVE1UYXF6ZGN6UFp2TkJkQlAv?= =?utf-8?B?ZVpIRktYblgwbmhUay9DMy9Dbmx6a3RxSzFoa1I2RG9kbng3S3phZ2JkRVFX?= =?utf-8?B?SHdWNFBRYmFFOUZUNUNWaVZZd1BPd3lrc3l0dEs2b1pOZXRrK1RhTmthZ0Ns?= =?utf-8?B?S21JSFRRWVd2aUhmQkpZdFYzaTZ6bnRza3RjWU9HY2Z0YkxFc3hlZS9DekNS?= =?utf-8?B?cFlsRElOZVJJRnBWV2NRM0NGTm5Ud2xqNXhUZWdLMjk4aGpxUStqU2dmOEJi?= =?utf-8?B?VUF6bkVQYmpZdmYrSG1LVW0yc1g0QzNFRHZpTjFTYVFhSmRFV3dBbWxONnhB?= =?utf-8?B?U0hVUXdJQU15ZlZRM0lDdUZvdnVrNHV6dTNMRS9uVFpCRS9YQU1nWWp2clpj?= =?utf-8?B?cG9mZ005R0NsNm1YcUU3UE1wdzlRbDdGVnRSODBNbkNNa0gzNGVLVzJZekJG?= =?utf-8?B?MlVjSVd6anU0RFJhb2F4ZzI5eVQ0QXRWTmRTWEU0b09heVF6MG91S1VGelNB?= =?utf-8?B?aUlPQS9WSVA5TWovVEJMMEg5YWoxYWtJTlpwMkUxRFh3TFFyaXVXa3lsK29I?= =?utf-8?B?aDlRWEM1RmxlcEkxM0xZZzNqYkZwTk1mMElSbGZYL0dFNENIMG1PZmdmOG04?= =?utf-8?B?RGZ0UGVYRmMycGxBbUxZQVR5OXR3VkdZL0s3V09ZWHloT3hRbm5vYms0S2c3?= =?utf-8?B?RjVSb3FrQzR4UlRmek05bDhYclJHd3B6Q2JOTFJrSWNQNXRTaTRoczF5ejV0?= =?utf-8?B?SXFrZnIxbUNjS3QxNFNmWTVtZ0pVTFhBditmQkZvcURSSUJ3WDVhOWlNR1NL?= =?utf-8?B?MWlwRlRxbDcvOG1EYWlqeDYvMXlnbmYrb0xUbGdERUpkcTVYdz09?= X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-4755-11-msonline-outlook-ab7de.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c7ebf7dd-b1b5-4dd0-457e-08d9ca510c12 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM0PR02MB5763.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Dec 2021 22:26:10.3476 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR02MB5763 X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Guix team, I am using linux-libre in version 4.19. In this version there are no modules named framebuffer_coreboot and simplefb. So system reconfiguration complains about framebuffer_corebook being not found. Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [40.92.65.24 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [40.92.65.24 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (julienl81[at]hotmail.com) 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (julienl81[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.6 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52667 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:50:44 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) Dear Guix team, I am using linux-libre in version 4.19. In this version there are no modules named framebuffer_coreboot and simplefb. So system reconfiguration complains about framebuffer_corebook being not found. I of course applied the workaround (specifying initrd-modules with %base-initrd-modules minus framebuffer_coreboot and simplefb) but this is not really nice. I also understand the constraints. Would it be a valid solution that linux-modules.scm discards modules which are not found (instead of returning an error and stopping)? Thanks, -- Julien L. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 04 19:01:37 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2022 00:01:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nG8WH-0007ut-Gq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 19:01:37 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:38181) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nG8WF-0007ue-Rn for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 19:01:36 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56F13201F49; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 19:01:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Feb 2022 19:01:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; bh=0Pqaz1 t3MYZ7qV/ZN7MF2Km2KCH+Mn3hY1BQicLhMBk=; b=FvJTb5z5jTZkc3PkLOxNuf KwB+/alpiFUa113DUIDgUJkbUG1SetbKYLNWISGFHz6BIFG1Cwx8m8KneDqbWzdr CIPP4M6m4hNSFiMTaU9AhWJizrBgigWqUZbeQgJBbqWHS3xXJHGr7wl+HKcKpGBt XRejxzZjaWSLWKum3XVxM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=0Pqaz1t3MYZ7qV/ZN7MF2Km2KCH+Mn3hY1BQicLhMBk=; b=kvW5CPne TlYkNbsrWOJrpKrllb3c78HTAFdUJU5Li5Y6adnUJbYVMwzdw9fTesUNczj1QYuJ xU32eOB2lkV8D+DsESLSkFttpllRa+l2rAy9aOcRGoVLf+jMHK/Dplk1VdO9JQwM gbH07XL5reaybJBp0r40JIuK95XQWxaYusLI5YfAahdy4F8sIQvtzmOLP99bBzHH XMZ7LKWlG7yDiJ2mSWj0GF6lTcSVHH8DTeLYAirmXMFRUJxklzDREXL1oMSLWiGM w+StLnly8Zy6o2nD/yilVF9z/lxeDzmwudkK+rluTmiJmUfgo2uD5wh/Z6I3n98I KApS/jZLaAbrOA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrhedtgddujecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecugfhmphhthicushhusghjvggtthculddutddmnecujf gurhepfffhvffkgggtugesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgr rhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephf ejiefgfeevvdefteehgeeltdekvedutdegtdduieetheetgedvfeffudfffeffnecuvehl uhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmh hulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 19:01:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 19:01:27 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 53554 52667 Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [64.147.123.24 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.7 BODY_EMPTY No body text in message X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 53554 52667 Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [64.147.123.24 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 1.7 BODY_EMPTY No body text in message merge 53554 52667 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 09 11:39:20 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 16:39:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHpzz-0000jw-SH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:39:20 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36204) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHpzy-0000jp-78 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:39:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHpzx-0007hL-V3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:39:18 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:42829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHpzo-0006c5-5n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:39:16 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0BC3201E3E; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:39:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:39:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from :from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; bh=nSsFQn/3j1v lJUmjqmZYWBGYCG5vFLwQNKryV8Z2iJc=; b=mPfGO31Uc9DxAKfUhledt0lpCOy VH1tyATF6Wp29DvHN92X3jdGNVS0lOyCAnzISbdaaGTR74autXPom6n3s6WSVZhy 88tRfZnxRtSMggIDvV0cvgSsTSK+uo1GbKEWipKcSN/z461iqxZ7eFtitQuBI1vI sbQnEngFLg1N7zm0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=nSsFQn/3j1vlJUmjqmZYWBGYCG5vFLwQNKryV8Z2i Jc=; b=l2Mn63aXQEGt2Xb5xFHBodKYO04Z/C8+rECmlbR56XCjwVNyOkv+Mx1U1 szpD1d6D/J6tcT0cF5+2YAZkrtlDA08kgTfvBSyG9tOwBW/Bl83mQSDZ2RI7tfRF bkMvvx6aBC7wL0WKBhnxecLanzfNEyFDVBpwivpKDEHJmX5xOr/NNp8o2CR1r7vJ dJTqVwqHVsNuCcl6Gblt+MyHUEB2B0Y9bjEN9n7lVNnsDTMLOxmqVDsyK6cncZz2 Yoa8JyS9Vw4x2kMzR8+iMM3Ky69pxSmYr9BO+ilOBjl6DMIDa8uNsUwaGz7cv6zm Tpq3vcjHtnCxdKVwcZf9eSs2kD/Fw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrheelgdeltdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtqhortddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeejleefleegveeitddtvddugeettdfhvdefgfefvdeufeeigfeuhfdvveeihfei vdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvg hosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:39:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:39:00 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Vivien Kraus via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: Re: bug#52667: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv Message-ID: References: <871r28uyc7.fsf@planete-kraus.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <871r28uyc7.fsf@planete-kraus.eu> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.20; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 52667-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 09:35:52PM +0100, Vivien Kraus via Bug reports for = GNU Guix wrote: > On master, I can=E2=80=99t reconfigure my system, because the linux-modul= es.drv > fails with the following error: [...]=20 > gnu/build/linux-modules.scm:257:5: kernel module not found "simplefb" "/g= nu/store/1ai7mxw5ad58ic9slxsjzsxaryi5wksp-linux-libre-5.10.87/lib/modules" This should be fixed with commit fd6cfbc05ac093a6b9497e6c38bb4678f33ac14d From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:06:27 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator