GNU bug report logs - #52580
29.0.50; emoji-insert: no male/female alternatives available

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Michael Welsh Duggan <mwd <at> md5i.com>

Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 15:20:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Michael Welsh Duggan <mwd <at> md5i.com>
Cc: 52580 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#52580: 29.0.50; emoji-insert: no male/female alternatives available
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:46:21 +0100

Michael Welsh Duggan <mwd <at> md5i.com> writes:

> This appears to be due to a discrepancy in the `emoji--derived' data.
> The male/female variants exist, but they are indexed on the male
> version.  For example:
>
> 	       "🙍"
> 	       ("🙍🏻" "🙍🏼" "🙍🏽" "🙍🏾" "🙍🏿")
> 	       "🙍‍♂️"
> 	       ("🙍🏻‍♂️" "🙍🏼‍♂️" "🙍🏽‍♂️" "🙍🏾‍♂️" "🙍🏿‍♂️" "🙍‍♀️" "🙍🏻‍♀️" "🙍🏼‍♀️" "🙍🏽‍♀️" "🙍🏾‍♀️" "🙍🏿‍♀️")
>
> These two lines from emoji-labels.el show the various PERSON FROWNING
> variants.  The base ones are indexed on PERSON FROWNING, but the
> gendered variants are indexed on "man frowning".

Yup.  I've now fixed this in Emacs 29.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 153 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.