From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:20:38 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52539: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated Resent-From: Jacob First Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 07:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 52539 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 52539@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.163963807731607 (code B ref -1); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 07:02:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2021 07:01:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34344 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxklR-0008Dj-GE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 02:01:17 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52896) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxklP-0008Da-IT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 02:01:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxklP-0005Kz-6D for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 02:01:15 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180]:36806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxklN-0000uH-9T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 02:01:14 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f180.google.com with SMTP id v13so790404pfi.3 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:01:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=DnCGGNWB9L5QlKVM02GEpQt5mAYTBZgxZhB5RqO3KKQ=; b=KjMwWzBaNv/SACXqd2vrJvhDc1Mxh2sxbxp6Eg/AyRFwbmECAcuSsT47o/7gb6BfH4 dE3VMDi4HBn2DR6lR1TTFj+Zm9IL0iDS+/st1LDBjpkjSpqkNs8rqNMzAfQ2XOopmS7/ Wd0UpkBzfpNIokqXJEqTDdMUkPUelquLBBpBYhTidfWmhYoBxd1RlusOQq0Z53P4uGUT FYamHRV5w8NKHelZQJcwiHT8CJI3xJ/N4gmVdX+qvDyLoVMlPxQJJ5cXiHjQxjoQJZuA Brhiq++M3ep10xRSeX2ZF6R88gMvdMs+wcKMfU2IoKAvFj0B/Ls0jGiMVfjMnA1XoSF9 e25A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53067pY9XhFIKK8eiNEkrh1R1aq9GFnswAvEBKR6H9JKF3DHOsVy 3DHNAZXhc5oqbHO8sN1VK5K4KO1DscohXw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwh0s0OlHLBBtRcYFC6W852VfRkYBH2G//sXo1D612Xz4Nd7brf5oAceUCxV6n7/aa+8K547g== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2645:: with SMTP id m66mr2529886pgm.143.1639638070977; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:01:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com (mail-pj1-f48.google.com. [209.85.216.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 25sm4346262pgz.49.2021.12.15.23.01.10 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:01:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id np6-20020a17090b4c4600b001a90b011e06so21711480pjb.5 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:01:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3ecc:: with SMTP id rm12mr4455422pjb.22.1639638070390; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:01:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jacob First Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 07:00:59 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=first.jacob@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-f180.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) In my Guix system's /etc/passwd file, my user named "abc" has a comment attached to it. The relevant line is: abc:x:1000:998:Old Comment:/home/jkf:/gnu/store/71yp1p06jy2j96bfdz43f4p6ncdym5a1-zsh-5.8/bin/zsh Today the users section of my current config.scm looks like this: (users (cons* (user-account (name "abc") (group "users") (comment "New Comment") (supplementary-groups '("wheel" "netdev" "audio" "video" "disk" "cdrom" "docker" "libvirt" "kvm")) (shell #~(string-append #$zsh "/bin/zsh"))) %base-user-accounts)) After I apply this configuration with `guix system reconfigure', I expect /etc/passwd to have been updated with "New Comment" in place of "Old Comment". However, "Old Comment" remains. Similarly, if I omit the `comment' field entirely, I expect my user comment to be removed from /etc/passwd, since the default value of the `comment' field is documented to be an empty string (manual 10.6). Again, the old comment remains. I am reporting this on a recent Guix version cev9c6c5, but have noticed this issue for a year at least. From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:20:38 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52539: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 04:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52539 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jacob First , 52539@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52539.163971374532164 (code B ref 52539); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 04:03:01 +0000 Received: (at 52539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2021 04:02:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37521 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1my4Rt-0008Me-Bg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:02:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:44704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1my4Rr-0008MQ-5y for 52539@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:02:23 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id t18so1537081wrg.11 for <52539@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 20:02:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R69dqPUmLEV7+VGE+/F0EpFkLERZKcDgQ2B6xm3+VMk=; b=JKjDb9EOWmWL5wDStKNFVsBe/tfQ2RpBKpiWdPXfuOzorgy6NPPH/iG7bVefp6RCJz X0u4wMtbfXpYJ1uBzS1waeNCyHm4GSbvzOUU82LCKCPF8X+AdwVzjuzYwG+MBuTCJjEI opdHarnAXvrDZHEs9VjIAmcKGXt/4z/c58Qcw7tMZSqtrxrM4MtHy+3lYHE7vgLJOjRi DWAbV6OiBEX+P8NWbQKSOvQE1x01rdRaIOFBjqk/8ucngwE9J+eKJpbX0sZESZQHoy/T oNAkHmQLt94ZTpyG6UcQETSdvQGw0/DrsOC2AGMndRgrFC8CtWFiCq2D7nekZYigk4i+ HUHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R69dqPUmLEV7+VGE+/F0EpFkLERZKcDgQ2B6xm3+VMk=; b=VPzf/b1SyHGRNXqetZw44IbS0HkdE/kZso/zA734w2KCF+lwtPpidXtqAX/ALC/7Hy QojS6NUlU7zVz3cww7V2YcGBTszKbQgO65DEEIxMyRLGZACnUvLFfvPyqgkzgAKONfhK aA0k45SjdUwjPxFMzNiWJQDseWIbomXa4xQKV4yJ8X9O4UE1AcNhDL9SwxECe8uouBQ7 Ctjr5UqHobzL6VAC6kxc24cGZXmaF8cjvxVwHEZUv6pzaAIjnmUDmYQ51uVUPUn8SlPJ vGt7/FB87pulktNyXGExM0iY2dZM1DvgMOMzMtBcbLTo7jVYvd8rRhwON8S9BaCZVrad gZrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kySw+0eHc2K0L5i8mFk9BtabFmA/M0jegnEwcG2Uu/XNSomPA KRmjCsC2tPOxq4bUtuM/s3B9vIzvm6Hdbg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSZ42A0P+tcXZVenUMDUag2V+hZmhkSiF0l1BRXUmsj/E/1ZjttULyoR21Uf+oV7cghZYK/w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:da41:: with SMTP id r1mr788271wrl.443.1639713737226; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 20:02:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from nijino.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l22sm6127537wmq.2.2021.12.16.20.02.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 20:02:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8e7f7b1988602bad8d0adf06944726545200800a.camel@gmail.com> From: Liliana Marie Prikler Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 05:02:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 07:00 +0000 schrieb Jacob First: > In my Guix system's /etc/passwd file, my user named "abc" has a > comment attached to it. The relevant line is: > > =?UTF-8?Q?=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0?= abc:x:100 [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL, https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/ [209.85.221.68 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (liliana.prikler[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.68 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Hi, Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 07:00 +0000 schrieb Jacob First: > In my Guix system's /etc/passwd file, my user named "abc" has a > comment attached to it. The relevant line is: > >     abc:x:1000:998:Old > Comment:/home/jkf:/gnu/store/71yp1p06jy2j96bfdz43f4p6ncdym5a1-zsh- > 5.8/bin/zsh > > Today the users section of my current config.scm looks like this: > >     (users (cons* (user-account >                     (name "abc") >                     (group "users") >                     (comment "New Comment") >                     (supplementary-groups '("wheel" >                                             "netdev" >                                             "audio" >                                             "video" >                                             "disk" >                                             "cdrom" >                                             "docker" >                                             "libvirt" >                                             "kvm")) >                     (shell #~(string-append #$zsh "/bin/zsh"))) >                    %base-user-accounts)) > > After I apply this configuration with `guix system reconfigure', I > expect /etc/passwd to have been updated with "New Comment" in place > of "Old Comment". However, "Old Comment" remains. > > Similarly, if I omit the `comment' field entirely, I expect my user > comment to be removed from /etc/passwd, since the default value of > the `comment' field is documented to be an empty string (manual > 10.6). Again, the old comment remains. > > I am reporting this on a recent Guix version cev9c6c5, but have > noticed this issue for a year at least. What if you were to temporarily change your login shell to let's say bash? IIRC, Guix is quite lazy when it comes to updating these values, but a change in the shell ought to get them revised. I think the reason behind it is that it doesn't want to lock you out by messing with the password field, but that's a little unrelated here. Cheers From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:20:38 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52539: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated Resent-From: Jacob First Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52539 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 52539@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52539.16400439709406 (code B ref 52539); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 52539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2021 23:46:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51735 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzSM6-0002Re-Fn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:46:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171]:33782) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzSM1-0002Qo-Fm for 52539@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:46:09 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id y7so9323457plp.0 for <52539@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:46:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=BAr+j0Cn8dbkYJKjAHKRsJ2eLkCHkTK+Tr0DII0bW8Q=; b=OUFDaVRWAMqRB6xjnEltMkdYogxWLbIZtZjKkJdGu/4uG0oWBS3DGIK3PSNY02+uio NmRhZJvrfQRwmjvXwEwjbxr+2gMzBNzO9waXn8JhleouY/A9W60l2hLb7yOXzDssYhn6 xlg/cM7uopgADaaa+KG6Tl73qN0osEFly2uFb28uuJ4HGQv2RyxTFcef9BDMBYuNuhSP 915/0rxHvoL9etYPc52GRiQWVr0Hc2afybCwJwcVr60waJeH8khk8dy77y0w3NAPjBdX vgWbD/OFqYnQIRp0msao5DITplGthWH0uwHCRsD6Fl/DwAoZZX3qV5O6uEj3eXti9Lxy CafA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Na9FHi1MYWQPHv/iMvPFx2iV5kfnYSxO09KhicOWektRrE1/b zbsGgtQPq9+3QBVDNGbCrVxqmbfBmrY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4PJgRMd5AjqkjxjGCoNw+ksyVpf44RGuyZKQrBM/0wJovihe+knz3SMiES5zZjdcorTdjpQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7001:b0:148:b1ec:9b0b with SMTP id y1-20020a170902700100b00148b1ec9b0bmr561583plk.18.1640043959149; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:45:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pj1-f45.google.com (mail-pj1-f45.google.com. [209.85.216.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w13sm343608pgm.5.2021.12.20.15.45.58 for <52539@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:45:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-f45.google.com with SMTP id j6-20020a17090a588600b001a78a5ce46aso781725pji.0 for <52539@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:45:58 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fe0b:: with SMTP id ck11mr764986pjb.22.1640043958476; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:45:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8e7f7b1988602bad8d0adf06944726545200800a.camel@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8e7f7b1988602bad8d0adf06944726545200800a.camel@gmail.com> From: Jacob First Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:45:47 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Changing the shell indeed causes the comment to be updated. If lazy update is the correct behavior, then the docs about user accounts are a bit misleading: "When booting or upon completion of guix system reconfigure, the system ensures that only the user accounts and groups specified in the operating-system declaration exist, and with the specified properties. Thus, account or group creations or modifications made by directly invoking commands such as useradd are lost upon reconfiguration or reboot. This ensures that the system remains exactly as declared." As a user it would be helpful to know from the docs that some of the fields actually persist across reboots/reconfigurations. Thanks for the workaround in any case! On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 4:02 AM Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, dem 16.12.2021 um 07:00 +0000 schrieb Jacob First: > > In my Guix system's /etc/passwd file, my user named "abc" has a > > comment attached to it. The relevant line is: > > > > abc:x:1000:998:Old > > Comment:/home/jkf:/gnu/store/71yp1p06jy2j96bfdz43f4p6ncdym5a1-zsh- > > 5.8/bin/zsh > > > > Today the users section of my current config.scm looks like this: > > > > (users (cons* (user-account > > (name "abc") > > (group "users") > > (comment "New Comment") > > (supplementary-groups '("wheel" > > "netdev" > > "audio" > > "video" > > "disk" > > "cdrom" > > "docker" > > "libvirt" > > "kvm")) > > (shell #~(string-append #$zsh "/bin/zsh"))) > > %base-user-accounts)) > > > > After I apply this configuration with `guix system reconfigure', I > > expect /etc/passwd to have been updated with "New Comment" in place > > of "Old Comment". However, "Old Comment" remains. > > > > Similarly, if I omit the `comment' field entirely, I expect my user > > comment to be removed from /etc/passwd, since the default value of > > the `comment' field is documented to be an empty string (manual > > 10.6). Again, the old comment remains. > > > > I am reporting this on a recent Guix version cev9c6c5, but have > > noticed this issue for a year at least. > What if you were to temporarily change your login shell to let's say > bash? IIRC, Guix is quite lazy when it comes to updating these values, > but a change in the shell ought to get them revised. I think the > reason behind it is that it doesn't want to lock you out by messing > with the password field, but that's a little unrelated here. > > Cheers > From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:20:38 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52539: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 22:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52539 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jacob First Cc: 52539@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52539.164021260618288 (code B ref 52539); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 22:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 52539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2021 22:36:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59938 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0AE2-0004ku-7o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:36:46 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:46576) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0AE0-0004kb-IV for 52539@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:36:45 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1E3329; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 23:36:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ypH0Wh46P-yT; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 23:36:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net [91.160.117.201]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E0052A2; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 23:36:37 +0100 (CET) From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 23:36:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Jacob First's message of "Thu, 16 Dec 2021 07:00:59 +0000") Message-ID: <87v8zgxo5m.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8C1E3329 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi, Jacob First skribis: > After I apply this configuration with `guix system reconfigure', I > expect /etc/passwd to have been updated with "New Comment" in place of > "Old Comment". However, "Old Comment" remains. This is on purpose, per these lines in =E2=80=98allocate-passwd=E2=80=99 in= (gnu build accounts): (real-name (if previous (password-entry-real-name previous) real-name)) This wasn=E2=80=99t a firm decision, but I think the rationale here could be that we=E2=80=99d rather allow users to change their name with =E2=80=98chf= n=E2=80=99 to something other than what the sysadmin chose, than enforce the sysadmin=E2=80=99s choice. (Except that =E2=80=98chfn=E2=80=99 is currentl= y not setuid by default on Guix System, so the scenario above is unlikely.) Thoughts? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:20:38 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52539: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated Resent-From: Jacob First Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 21:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52539 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 52539@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52539.16405558177683 (code B ref 52539); Sun, 26 Dec 2021 21:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 52539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2021 21:56:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41747 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n1bVg-0001zr-Q7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 16:56:57 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]:44888) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n1bVf-0001za-N4 for 52539@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 16:56:56 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f42.google.com with SMTP id k6-20020a17090a7f0600b001ad9d73b20bso12843961pjl.3 for <52539@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 13:56:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O3u09XYKG5/vl/wMRqkte6npiaf1Q/IPbJSpu/jUKW8=; b=tyofBh5dtCtnFxI+N93pH+yrTxL//YjAnQlsCMC7DCagufq4V+w65o5ox8RoOW0Atv yDWCLr5ifZMZ1TEbfjzkO4/bpXYu61OxDqA8pHtvISa1hWaO3MSUZJzB4uLaVtwKV6nI PvBqHN6OvGuNwiOuF0l8zsXgw/T3dkqmuql5rjGS4pXVyFpRox1E/E9TI7a+jmXMPBjR NWoPbm9YI1Prg/Cq4XeP5rT4tc8J0HKJ4S2YmVNzxCeccUyLXA9X6cvCMrOHVem/aXaa EZb3C5G7qn9ktS1hj1f/3ZM/ENB83W+HYSIjA33VGf05bmSOG0OD56F/cTKz9jsIeBA8 IN+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530VthT674aYHHIfKdynZuSLKpsdRU/RGNC/LDp4iPQQ++Z0QP06 lEqvcOCAwS1slwUJKfsHtDU2vqsvhsU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQa/AkXUB723H8W1fFUqt9tH51JQ3sRbSi6LbLFJDBJZCS1BWfreu9hJerred/STRv6ayPzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:281:b0:148:a3f4:1ec4 with SMTP id j1-20020a170903028100b00148a3f41ec4mr14800765plr.158.1640555809606; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 13:56:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pj1-f50.google.com (mail-pj1-f50.google.com. [209.85.216.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d21sm15472359pfv.45.2021.12.26.13.56.49 for <52539@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Dec 2021 13:56:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-f50.google.com with SMTP id iy13so11998009pjb.5 for <52539@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 13:56:49 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fe0b:: with SMTP id ck11mr18473453pjb.22.1640555808801; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 13:56:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87v8zgxo5m.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87v8zgxo5m.fsf@gnu.org> From: Jacob First Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 21:56:37 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Thanks for the explanation. This rationale sounds reasonable to me. If someone with proper permission has modified a user account's comment, it could be important to preserve that customization. As I pointed out in an earlier message, I believe this behavior contradicts the documentation of the `user-account' data type pretty strongly. So it appears there is at least a "doc bug" here. FWIW, I actually reported the present behavior as a bug not because of the doc issue, but based on an assumption that "purely declarative" implied the result of applying a given configuration should not depend on any preexisting system state like a user comment. Sorry for not making that clear: it seemed obvious, but I think it's actually a misconception (even if user accounts are one of the few areas, AFAICT, where the property doesn't hold true). On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:36 PM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > Hi, > > Jacob First skribis: > > > After I apply this configuration with `guix system reconfigure', I > > expect /etc/passwd to have been updated with "New Comment" in place of > > "Old Comment". However, "Old Comment" remains. > > This is on purpose, per these lines in =E2=80=98allocate-passwd=E2=80=99 = in (gnu build > accounts): > > (real-name (if previous > (password-entry-real-name previous) > real-name)) > > This wasn=E2=80=99t a firm decision, but I think the rationale here could= be > that we=E2=80=99d rather allow users to change their name with =E2=80=98c= hfn=E2=80=99 to > something other than what the sysadmin chose, than enforce the > sysadmin=E2=80=99s choice. (Except that =E2=80=98chfn=E2=80=99 is curren= tly not setuid by > default on Guix System, so the scenario above is unlikely.) > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:20:38 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Jacob First Subject: bug#52539: closed (Re: bug#52539: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated) Message-ID: References: <87bl0wptnj.fsf@gnu.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 52539 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 52539@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:33:01 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1640971981-32595-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1640971981-32595-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #52539: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 52539@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 52539: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D52539 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1640971981-32595-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 52539-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2021 17:32:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57393 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n3LlQ-0008Se-Dv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:32:24 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:58368) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n3LlP-0008SS-64 for 52539-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:32:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C2C3F3; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:32:17 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AQnWagzgFVP8; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:32:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net [91.160.117.201]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 965EB287; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:32:16 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Jacob First Subject: Re: bug#52539: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated References: <87v8zgxo5m.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 11 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 230 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:32:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Jacob First's message of "Sun, 26 Dec 2021 21:56:37 +0000") Message-ID: <87bl0wptnj.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B1C2C3F3 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52539-done Cc: 52539-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi Jacob, Jacob First skribis: > Thanks for the explanation. This rationale sounds reasonable to me. If > someone with proper permission has modified a user account's comment, > it could be important to preserve that customization. > > As I pointed out in an earlier message, I believe this behavior > contradicts the documentation of the `user-account' data type pretty > strongly. So it appears there is at least a "doc bug" here. > > FWIW, I actually reported the present behavior as a bug not because of > the doc issue, but based on an assumption that "purely declarative" > implied the result of applying a given configuration should not depend > on any preexisting system state like a user comment. Sorry for not > making that clear: it seemed obvious, but I think it's actually a > misconception (even if user accounts are one of the few areas, AFAICT, > where the property doesn't hold true). I clarified this and ensures =E2=80=98chfn=E2=80=99 is actually usable in c= ommit c76775263e56a10cc1b84d03a5827f42436afe40. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1640971981-32595-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2021 07:01:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34344 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxklR-0008Dj-GE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 02:01:17 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52896) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxklP-0008Da-IT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 02:01:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxklP-0005Kz-6D for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 02:01:15 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180]:36806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxklN-0000uH-9T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 02:01:14 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f180.google.com with SMTP id v13so790404pfi.3 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:01:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=DnCGGNWB9L5QlKVM02GEpQt5mAYTBZgxZhB5RqO3KKQ=; b=KjMwWzBaNv/SACXqd2vrJvhDc1Mxh2sxbxp6Eg/AyRFwbmECAcuSsT47o/7gb6BfH4 dE3VMDi4HBn2DR6lR1TTFj+Zm9IL0iDS+/st1LDBjpkjSpqkNs8rqNMzAfQ2XOopmS7/ Wd0UpkBzfpNIokqXJEqTDdMUkPUelquLBBpBYhTidfWmhYoBxd1RlusOQq0Z53P4uGUT FYamHRV5w8NKHelZQJcwiHT8CJI3xJ/N4gmVdX+qvDyLoVMlPxQJJ5cXiHjQxjoQJZuA Brhiq++M3ep10xRSeX2ZF6R88gMvdMs+wcKMfU2IoKAvFj0B/Ls0jGiMVfjMnA1XoSF9 e25A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53067pY9XhFIKK8eiNEkrh1R1aq9GFnswAvEBKR6H9JKF3DHOsVy 3DHNAZXhc5oqbHO8sN1VK5K4KO1DscohXw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwh0s0OlHLBBtRcYFC6W852VfRkYBH2G//sXo1D612Xz4Nd7brf5oAceUCxV6n7/aa+8K547g== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2645:: with SMTP id m66mr2529886pgm.143.1639638070977; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:01:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com (mail-pj1-f48.google.com. [209.85.216.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 25sm4346262pgz.49.2021.12.15.23.01.10 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:01:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id np6-20020a17090b4c4600b001a90b011e06so21711480pjb.5 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:01:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3ecc:: with SMTP id rm12mr4455422pjb.22.1639638070390; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 23:01:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jacob First Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 07:00:59 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated To: bug-guix@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=first.jacob@gmail.com; helo=mail-pf1-f180.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) In my Guix system's /etc/passwd file, my user named "abc" has a comment attached to it. The relevant line is: abc:x:1000:998:Old Comment:/home/jkf:/gnu/store/71yp1p06jy2j96bfdz43f4p6ncdym5a1-zsh-5.8/bin/zsh Today the users section of my current config.scm looks like this: (users (cons* (user-account (name "abc") (group "users") (comment "New Comment") (supplementary-groups '("wheel" "netdev" "audio" "video" "disk" "cdrom" "docker" "libvirt" "kvm")) (shell #~(string-append #$zsh "/bin/zsh"))) %base-user-accounts)) After I apply this configuration with `guix system reconfigure', I expect /etc/passwd to have been updated with "New Comment" in place of "Old Comment". However, "Old Comment" remains. Similarly, if I omit the `comment' field entirely, I expect my user comment to be removed from /etc/passwd, since the default value of the `comment' field is documented to be an empty string (manual 10.6). Again, the old comment remains. I am reporting this on a recent Guix version cev9c6c5, but have noticed this issue for a year at least. ------------=_1640971981-32595-1-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:20:38 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52539: Fwd: Comments in /etc/passwd don't get updated Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2022 14:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52539 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jacob First , 52539@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52539.164104696727382 (code B ref 52539); Sat, 01 Jan 2022 14:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 52539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2022 14:22:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n3fHT-00077a-8I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 09:22:47 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:46498) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n3fHR-00077J-Is for 52539@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 09:22:45 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1ED917D; Sat, 1 Jan 2022 15:22:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h1UViTJxjPQy; Sat, 1 Jan 2022 15:22:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BBF063; Sat, 1 Jan 2022 15:22:38 +0100 (CET) From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87bl0wptnj.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2022 15:22:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: (GNU bug Tracking System's message of "Fri, 31 Dec 2021 17:33:01 +0000") Message-ID: <877dbjpmc3.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: hera.aquilenet.fr; none X-Rspamd-Server: hera X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D1ED917D X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) > I clarified this and ensures =E2=80=98chfn=E2=80=99 is actually usable in= commit > c76775263e56a10cc1b84d03a5827f42436afe40. Oops, I hadn=E2=80=99t pushed; the right commit ID is 671e6a81804f264ddcdd6fe7579644404da079b8. Ludo=E2=80=99.