From unknown Fri Sep 19 17:22:32 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#52494 <52494@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#52494 <52494@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 13.0.14; Please rerun for me, if necessary Reply-To: bug#52494 <52494@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 00:22:32 +0000 retitle 52494 13.0.14; Please rerun for me, if necessary reassign 52494 auctex submitter 52494 Rolf Ade severity 52494 normal tag 52494 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 14 19:11:08 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2021 00:11:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxHsy-0005x3-Iw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:11:08 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxHsw-0005wu-7p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:11:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxHsv-0001uo-Vv for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:11:06 -0500 Received: from mxout5.interscholz.de ([85.236.196.72]:40277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxHsq-0005cw-5U for bug-auctex@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:11:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (mxout5 [127.0.0.1]) by mxout5.interscholz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F68205EE for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 01:10:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: interscholz amavisd-new at mxout5.interscholz.de Received: from server.web01.interscholz.net (server.web01.interscholz.net [85.236.196.138]) by mxout5.interscholz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8856D213BF for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 01:10:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from pointsman2 (pd9fd6fea.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.253.111.234]) by server.web01.interscholz.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15FEE340405; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 01:10:02 +0100 (CET) From: Rolf Ade To: bug-auctex@gnu.org Subject: 13.0.14; Please rerun for me, if necessary Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 01:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: <875yrqsp7q.fsf@pointsman.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.236.196.72; envelope-from=rolf@pointsman.de; helo=mxout5.interscholz.de X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) TeX-LaTeX-sentinel notices the user in at least five cases per message() he should rerun LaTeX (or a similar command) for this or that reason. I stumbled over that as user of the longtable package If is it necessary to rerun the command and the tex file otherwise formatted successfully why isn't this done automatically for me? The only reason I can think of for not immediately rerun in such cases is formatting time and the intermediate result is fine enough for what it was generated. So opt-in would be pretty fine. Providing a patch would be even better, I'm aware, but not able to provide one, atm. But from tinkering around a bit in the AucTeX sources code I figure it should be a somewhat low hanging fruit for someone familiar with the inner yards. Emacs : GNU Emacs 26.2 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of 2019-04-19 Package: 13.0.14 current state: ============== (setq AUCTeX-date "2021-08-26" window-system 'x LaTeX-version "2e" From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 14 20:30:29 2021 Received: (at 52494) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2021 01:30:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59917 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxJ7l-0007pA-8V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:30:29 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:51591) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxJ7i-0007ow-1W for 52494@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:30:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1639531819; bh=tn59tSVtO8fjU2dw9lh8Skt7nJrcZ8mrXRXU79ZWZ+4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Reply-to; b=bj39b6ey1Nb/bh0RW4v9C9fxLQ/xG0fWUA/IfneP3i1+iSAHEMAsc760GCrsg8vIU +9RJ9lPWT54uBpsr0NBGFPEB+sHS7B5+ZJkh5UccdfFQnamwfdUS60ia6bJfJ5Kwno RGrSFHGlcodpqMU9QaD5g+vlkohAZeoJkHAY9A/s= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from vhost ([87.123.101.26]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MRk0W-1n4Qvx0odm-00TVci; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:30:19 +0100 From: Reinhard Kotucha MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <25017.17706.408378.213356@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:30:18 +0100 To: Rolf Ade Subject: Re: bug#52494: 13.0.14; Please rerun for me, if necessary In-Reply-To: <875yrqsp7q.fsf@pointsman.de> References: <875yrqsp7q.fsf@pointsman.de> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:b3u17ag3klhgXsMPxe3i+rfj+XkROgI0cs0ezb1w37eUyf4GNi5 lwp3JJh+PNHdUg09oYvgtlgWIiUXfciF1blpHNdX2Aplm/7PnJ2E54z2rLM7u4kVqxqILUg PdllUUuj9HqcBqffySrMilyUzLhL62Zr6QWUuGmsS74SMoMzeGFENciQc9iLwAgFiuZs17J WDFUOhq0p3hHWbg+1HWww== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:46nN90mxsME=:ssXgFI988C0qLDVnljxdGv 4Mvi81r91ujYLoetecPLCpxr0IAsNvnVNOliKAAjxAHLTzhjj9XsR2eGA8KuNt9M3H9G4JQRI xvavjNzC5qUwDVzhMROyD4NyoVwR663h48Nxj5IIsL+d81Abz6B/tzcWBjOdNimo/y7hOLJhR 2hN5fkUuw7XFNNlX7VHuzccLmdI+xxWtaqmmd1u0MFk3JGObSfzFpRO1SpWr1li/K2GV9ThO+ ka2SDg0U8MixUPYrBkfuQ0lBGkP5j0bZdFFlfF8639lHV57zurhZixOm4fRiLbRkI6oHi9buU HbQ43J0h68VdQxRBocJkyQrJxyK9UOZ6hcHdFLMSN5Pvlu6BRCun0REYAwZgGQGXEatjcv4mH WFEtLU1+hRifejdVKXQf0p/hkyHw0v3ILFC+MWm74fGBnyBs342U3fMAtlMxqskbibLSgS3dd kLiCkgHtfrfjqYQiUc/u9lxloFh3iZLlCocWrmD+tEtBymerA5LD1Prxvq3Lmfh6fsaTxQLHV pJIC/kYkGg2g7L5Ufx4f4OWm7pfSmKSeao0C+5gOy0RXSpLqCuDokZp6MwWh24/xxFjhc3fiA +0IeA7irQv87ULYECdfPPp+RZ3qGv0Fhm41cxna6vyoDF6SxJKHEC5byZOeBNN4edzDhwqKrd M+ZBLKKvdZ+JP6Vqzs4jpWGwx28TV0sAJaV6meFYSNP4EEtgnlbgPu2jOWLiwEnaC2LxOV6FU jS0fDmxaV4MwKCKJ5MYInrrsECilhGZ8QATesCo89L9NwSErFrIZuCg0AIoyY96S7BV1xNW88 ZyXj6o3ICh43YZyW3dFYUimNLOcX7ewqi/DP+g17FfHWYQgzTdiU1ciMCC43FL1Mt8YT6rWVZ xkNDKydUz9jGs3gbl5jKNDPl2qrBc0F82VmBhaxQGHMDQTu5xJsijOxH6v0Mups+eevvOiRB1 ZnrgHj6x1d4IKvgjm00liUXafQ6WYoNxR7bbo2mVFilns/lsFb9iPxpzksiduR2leIYHXBBE3 s+mZwuLHACAcFuZ2aZkWSJU1qKwZyV6Yd6AUJWOp+/sXrDLkxMOGlYZVO38c5vXtPSLl/m4Nj 6SPhy54fqxHD5I= X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52494 Cc: 52494@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: reinhard.kotucha@web.de Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) On 2021-12-15 at 01:10:01 +0100, Rolf Ade wrote: > > TeX-LaTeX-sentinel notices the user in at least five cases per message(= ) > he should rerun LaTeX (or a similar command) for this or that reason. I > stumbled over that as user of the longtable package > > If is it necessary to rerun the command and the tex file otherwise > formatted successfully why isn't this done automatically for me? And run bibtex and makeindex etc. automatically too? In this case it would be much better and easier to compile with latexmk instead of {lua,pdf,xe}latex. > The only reason I can think of for not immediately rerun in such > cases is formatting time and the intermediate result is fine enough > for what it was generated. Of course. Emacs is fine while working on a particular file and compile time definitely matters. It's less important that the TOC is up-to-date then. And even if all cross references are resolved but bibtex and makeindex aren't run you don't get the final document anyway. Are you aware of latexmk? It's part of the TeX Live distribution. Don't know about MiKTeX. It's worth a try anyhow. Though I usually run latexmk on the command line I could imagine that AUCTeX offers an option to invoke latexmk when pressing C-c C-c in addition to "LaTeX", "View", ... Regards, Reinhard =2D- =2D----------------------------------------------------------------- Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112 Marschnerstr. 25 D-30167 Hannover mailto:reinhard.kotucha@web.de =2D----------------------------------------------------------------- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 15 01:38:09 2021 Received: (at 52494) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2021 06:38:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxNvU-00015w-N8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 01:38:08 -0500 Received: from smtp1a.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:40624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxNvS-00015m-BU for 52494@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 01:38:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (61-24-168-185.rev.home.ne.jp [61.24.168.185]) by smtp1a.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B627962; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:38:03 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: Rolf Ade , reinhard.kotucha@web.de Subject: Re: bug#52494: 13.0.14; Please rerun for me, if necessary In-reply-to: <25017.17706.408378.213356@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <875yrqsp7q.fsf@pointsman.de> <25017.17706.408378.213356@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Comments: In-reply-to Reinhard Kotucha message dated "Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:30:18 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <95886.1639550283.1@localhost> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:38:03 +0900 Message-ID: <95887.1639550283@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52494 Cc: 52494@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Rolf and Reinhard, >>>>> Reinhard Kotucha writes: > On 2021-12-15 at 01:10:01 +0100, Rolf Ade wrote: >> >> TeX-LaTeX-sentinel notices the user in at least five cases per message() >> he should rerun LaTeX (or a similar command) for this or that reason. I >> stumbled over that as user of the longtable package >> >> If is it necessary to rerun the command and the tex file otherwise >> formatted successfully why isn't this done automatically for me? There is already such a feature. Try C-c C-a in the document bufffer. Here is an excerption from info document `(auctex) Starting a Command'. ,---- | It is also possible to compile automatically the whole document until | it is ready with a single command: 'TeX-command-run-all'. | | -- Command: TeX-command-run-all | ('C-c C-a') Compile the current document until an error occurs or | it is finished. If compilation finishes successfully, run the | viewer at the end. `---- > And run bibtex and makeindex etc. automatically too? In this case it > would be much better and easier to compile with latexmk instead of > {lua,pdf,xe}latex. >> The only reason I can think of for not immediately rerun in such >> cases is formatting time and the intermediate result is fine enough >> for what it was generated. I guess that the most important reason is that it isn't guaranteed that AUCTeX infers correctly what command and how many times it should run. It is always safe to give the user a chance to decide what to do next. > Are you aware of latexmk? It's part of the TeX Live distribution. > Don't know about MiKTeX. It's worth a try anyhow. As Reinhard told, there is a tool latexmk which is specialized to execute the sequencial commands in line. You can try it. (But I don't know whether latexmk works for other formats than LaTeX (plain TeX, AMS-TeX, ConTeXt etc.)) > Though I usually run latexmk on the command line I could imagine that > AUCTeX offers an option to invoke latexmk when pressing C-c C-c in > addition to "LaTeX", "View", ... You can customize `TeX-command-list' to inlcude an entry to run latexmk. And as always, patches are welcome. ;-) Regards, Ikumi Keita From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 15 09:10:13 2021 Received: (at 52494) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2021 14:10:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60589 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxUyz-0002WT-1p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:10:13 -0500 Received: from mxout5.interscholz.de ([85.236.196.72]:32832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxUyu-0002VW-MT for 52494@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:10:12 -0500 Received: from localhost (mxout5 [127.0.0.1]) by mxout5.interscholz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C575320439; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:09:56 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: interscholz amavisd-new at mxout5.interscholz.de Received: from server.web01.interscholz.net (server.web01.interscholz.net [85.236.196.138]) by mxout5.interscholz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A6120164; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:09:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from pointsman2 (pd9fd6fea.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.253.111.234]) by server.web01.interscholz.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B524C34026C; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:09:26 +0100 (CET) From: Rolf Ade To: Ikumi Keita Subject: Re: bug#52494: 13.0.14; Please rerun for me, if necessary References: <875yrqsp7q.fsf@pointsman.de> <25017.17706.408378.213356@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <95887.1639550283@localhost> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:09:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <95887.1639550283@localhost> (Ikumi Keita's message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:38:03 +0900") Message-ID: <8735murmcp.fsf@pointsman.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52494 Cc: reinhard.kotucha@web.de, 52494@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Ikumi, Ikumi Keita writes: >>>>>> Reinhard Kotucha writes: >> On 2021-12-15 at 01:10:01 +0100, Rolf Ade wrote: >>> >>> TeX-LaTeX-sentinel notices the user in at least five cases per message() >>> he should rerun LaTeX (or a similar command) for this or that reason. I >>> stumbled over that as user of the longtable package >>> >>> If is it necessary to rerun the command and the tex file otherwise >>> formatted successfully why isn't this done automatically for me? > > There is already such a feature. Try C-c C-a in the document bufffer. > Here is an excerption from info document `(auctex) Starting a Command'. > ,---- > | It is also possible to compile automatically the whole document until > | it is ready with a single command: 'TeX-command-run-all'. > | > | -- Command: TeX-command-run-all > | ('C-c C-a') Compile the current document until an error occurs or > | it is finished. If compilation finishes successfully, run the > | viewer at the end. > `---- thanks for that hint. I tried it with my use case and it works pretty well. And automatically starting the viewer (without asking me for confirmation the view command, as C-c C-c does) if the compilation finished successfully is a welcomed plus. As far as I'm concerned this could be closed with "feature already there, user hasn't studied the documentation close enough". Thanks again and regards rolf From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 15 11:14:08 2021 Received: (at 52494) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2021 16:14:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxWuu-00063M-9C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:14:08 -0500 Received: from smtp1a.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:42028) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxWus-00063A-8a for 52494@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:14:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (61-24-168-185.rev.home.ne.jp [61.24.168.185]) by smtp1a.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0B06461; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 01:14:03 +0900 (JST) From: Ikumi Keita To: Rolf Ade Subject: Re: bug#52494: 13.0.14; Please rerun for me, if necessary In-reply-to: <8735murmcp.fsf@pointsman.de> References: <875yrqsp7q.fsf@pointsman.de> <25017.17706.408378.213356@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <95887.1639550283@localhost> <8735murmcp.fsf@pointsman.de> Comments: In-reply-to Rolf Ade message dated "Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:09:26 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <97076.1639584843.1@localhost> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 01:14:03 +0900 Message-ID: <97077.1639584843@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52494 Cc: reinhard.kotucha@web.de, 52494@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> Rolf Ade writes: > As far as I'm concerned this could be closed with "feature already > there, user hasn't studied the documentation close enough". OK, I'll close this bug. Bye, Ikumi Keita From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 15 11:14:37 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2021 16:14:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33558 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxWvN-00064A-FX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:14:37 -0500 Received: from smtp1a.inetd.co.jp ([210.129.88.11]:42034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxWvM-000642-9q for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:14:36 -0500 Received: from localhost (61-24-168-185.rev.home.ne.jp [61.24.168.185]) by smtp1a.inetd.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 861F061 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 01:14:35 +0900 (JST) To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Ikumi Keita Subject: control message for bug #52494 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <97083.1639584875.1@localhost> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 01:14:35 +0900 Message-ID: <97084.1639584875@localhost> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 52494 notabug close 52494 quit From unknown Fri Sep 19 17:22:32 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator