GNU bug report logs - #52493
29.0.50; Setting Inconsolata up in init.el makes default face rendered wrong

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 23:45:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Full log


Message #128 received at 52493 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>
Cc: rudalics <at> gmx.at, larsi <at> gnus.org, 52493 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim <at> gmail.com,
 dgutov <at> yandex.ru
Subject: Re: bug#52493: 29.0.50; Setting Inconsolata up in init.el makes
 default face rendered wrong
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 09:20:19 +0200
> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 23:39:34 +0000
> From: Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>
> cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, 
>     rudalics <at> gmx.at, rpluim <at> gmail.com, 52493 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > 2. I start 'emacs -Q' and evaluate (set-face-attribute 'default nil 
> > :height 105 :family "Inconsolata_dz") in *scratch*. I get that 
> > weird-looking font that blinks briefly in scenario 1. 'M-x describe-face 
> > RET default' reports "Ubuntu Condensed" as family.
> >
> 
> Again, can you try to evaluate (set-face-attribute 'default nil :height 
> 110 :font "Inconsolata_dz") (with ":font", not ":family") instead, and 
> tell us what happens?
> 
> Can you try your other recipes, using ":font" where you used ":family", 
> and tell us whether what happens is what you expected?

What is the significance of using :font instead of :family in these
cases, for the purpose of discussing and investigating this issue?




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 249 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.