From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 14 11:54:33 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 16:54:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59416 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxB4T-0007m2-0Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:54:33 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44026) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxB4R-0007lu-Kg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:54:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxB4R-0004Tv-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:54:31 -0500 Received: from fossa.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.62]:24581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxB4O-0000Z4-P8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:54:30 -0500 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB759461AF6 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a219.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 78254461C14 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:54:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a219.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.114.196.226 (trex/6.4.3); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:54:17 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Language-Bored: 2d9504384d01ae09_1639500857723_2803734265 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1639500857722:1958597649 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1639500857722 Received: from jidanni.org (36-234-81-75.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [36.234.81.75]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a219.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JD4Gd1GDQz1SX for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:54:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jidanni.org; s=jidanni.org; t=1639500857; bh=TFj1eYoOx8RsZ6PcicEjwTJ8HG4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EQP5Wj49lQtVgaRkF7nd9XCyLlvRaKzIvX3SAZ2s6BFwGnw8ENxD8TwFztEnrpj4F 9/hOnn9bnU4vL7JcWm1PynV8Qkpp9SLEIPpjfcQxkY6P2bE/0rEn2RvKws1dsvNpO4 QSRio6S/BNCr8CEvh1hyqp3IIbJb7hcC7IeqdOO4= From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Don't beep/flash as part of a response to a question Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:54:14 +0800 Message-ID: <87bl1j86vd.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=23.83.209.62; envelope-from=jidanni@jidanni.org; helo=fossa.birch.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) When prompted: A compilation process is running; kill it? (yes or no) if we say "no", our screen flashes, like we were a bad boy, and we see "Cannot have two processes in ‘*compilation*’ at once" OK, but why the beep/flash "spanking"? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 16 23:24:05 2021 Received: (at 52484) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2021 04:24:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1my4mr-0000U7-0Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:24:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1my4mp-0000TY-VT for 52484@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:24:04 -0500 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=60550 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1my4mk-0007Ra-F7; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:23:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=8zU1Z3ffPZgJeFfSUGlxkiYQCdoyQFcwh6P+eCMmDw0=; b=nRJ6Qr68TFco T+hs9kfPteyBJ9ueh/OKSc40NZSFW9eBiWffY72uGnOmGcGNJLRJ6IytufJsPKKOW2ihxdsMkbzgk gpjH6dheLPsBXA7YsRqwO0n7DmczHbrvG9IAAoIkLEdt00D+D2LlCw2xyC3rWXGExYW8rMnUYs4GT ZjFBK9U267rvQwTCwqLWo5kEOogxN+LZTBqrKCs4mUdj5X5x+YK4P2OgohkBOgBxnHC4EJvtGB07f 7HaUgJsCVoModYoJKeBriyaeyPdenvz+7gsDeGQMH+WK9YQLmASwVCEcHvZS57jIzxzqVxxvKFU/5 yiskn602hVzr/+cUDkBHmQ==; Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1my4mk-00083i-J6; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:23:58 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 From: Richard Stallman To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson In-Reply-To: <87bl1j86vd.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Subject: Re: bug#52484: Don't beep/flash as part of a response to a question References: <87bl1j86vd.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Message-Id: Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:23:58 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52484 Cc: 52484@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > OK, but why the beep/flash "spanking"? It isn't meant as a rebuke. It just means that the command could not proceed. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 17 01:16:28 2021 Received: (at 52484) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2021 06:16:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37671 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1my6Xc-0005yV-0P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 01:16:28 -0500 Received: from black.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.19]:26831) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1my6Xa-0005yN-ER for 52484@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 01:16:27 -0500 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A82461F9A; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 06:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a284.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B59BC460A3C; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 06:16:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a284.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.105.57.85 (trex/6.4.3); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 06:16:25 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Battle-Stretch: 32924b066d31649b_1639721784979_1507399733 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1639721784979:404766378 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1639721784979 Received: from jidanni.org (36-234-72-185.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [36.234.72.185]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a284.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JFdzD1yH0z1Ky; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 22:16:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jidanni.org; s=jidanni.org; t=1639721784; bh=cU1rsxdGXjHMtr/r2yNHIhqihyE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Content-Type; b=eQA909otb9Tdyv5b6gfsb/qvOKzJXlGYre1oZkimjBGH5hS6ORtxgpdY108RA4m4T o3mQNQpyrWswh7VV7bbvtpLpb6Og2mJQu8sqpFuwIVODQRQUqb3MTEgnhQ3mVrs50Q DtJk8DJ153Wdk4EyWPugVzNU0+ZJk1PxV4Jkk4O8= From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: Richard Stallman Subject: Re: bug#52484: Don't beep/flash as part of a response to a question References: <87bl1j86vd.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:16:20 +0800 Message-ID: <871r2bzrgr.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52484 Cc: 52484@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> "RMS" == Richard Stallman writes: >> OK, but why the beep/flash "spanking"? RMS> It isn't meant as a rebuke. It just means that the command could not RMS> proceed. Yeah, but the fire trucks are already at the scene. No need to turn the siren back on. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 19 07:58:36 2021 Received: (at 52484) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 12:58:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45172 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myvls-0005Ef-Ll for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 07:58:36 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41490) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myvlq-0005ER-La for 52484@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 07:58:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qNmbt7YhHrAf2Q7vghe7nSEXcWjnZAocAAeej6hZB30=; b=Kc8AfksnjB9gFwQdp4FYzJ6QyE EvgVq9QuVLZ0c071xe5UNrRhwAKxfbwfuRMNVdCBxm1Vn/ogHoxygmfNUxYTOiyO8LKU283N/dL7w v9jOZdP3I4BfRtLVBWHo84c2gOBU1+Nqg+VwNYH5NF5jJdLTx4U7XOq5Mhl/oSU+p6gI=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1myvli-0003oM-6t; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:58:28 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson Subject: Re: bug#52484: Don't beep/flash as part of a response to a question References: <87bl1j86vd.5.fsf@jidanni.org> X-Now-Playing: John Martyn's _Inside Out_: "Make No Mistake" Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:58:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87bl1j86vd.5.fsf@jidanni.org> (=?utf-8?B?IuepjeS4ueWwvA==?= Dan Jacobson"'s message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:54:14 +0800") Message-ID: <87ee68sqdq.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes: > When prompted: > A compilation process is running; kill it? (yes or no) > if we say "no", > our screen flashes, like we were a bad boy, > and we see > "Cannot have two processes in ‘*compilation* [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52484 Cc: 52484@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson writes: > When prompted: > A compilation process is running; kill it? (yes or no) > if we say "no", > our screen flashes, like we were a bad boy, > and we see > "Cannot have two processes in =E2=80=98*compilation*=E2=80=99 at once" > OK, but why the beep/flash "spanking"? When you type "no" it proceeds, and then errors out. The error will beep at you, so everything here seems to be working as designed, and I'm closing this bug report. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 19 07:58:52 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 12:58:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45175 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myvm7-0005F8-Sq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 07:58:52 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myvm5-0005Eu-Pa for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 07:58:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5J+TTPxGs01ca6JmjYbwObvQWr4UVz1zIme4rQ81Ctc=; b=bNPyszs6hOiG/0XYSMmdPUzMlc CyjuIXfjWZNTwk+zRh0LLcMQVl50JcS6Eny/WU1QnGFIPunE1MsKvTubXWQIebv1W6ZCHPHi8uOex XpYMB9Eyyl2mIsU8b9bfZKJjFXslYzO7/P7viRDced751NcDYd/neLCDwT8B7oZ6GoOU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1myvlx-0003oW-TE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:58:44 +0100 Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:58:36 +0100 Message-Id: <87czlssqdf.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #52484 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 52484 wontfix close 52484 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 52484 wontfix close 52484 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 19 16:58:24 2021 Received: (at 52484) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 21:58:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48396 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz4CF-0008Aq-RG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:58:24 -0500 Received: from aye.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.6]:7778) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz4CD-0008Ac-0H for 52484@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:58:21 -0500 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2250880C11; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a219.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 171998806C0; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:58:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a219.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.120.81.136 (trex/6.4.3); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:58:19 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Language-Madly: 2501e4f7450d23b3_1639951099780_4040865357 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1639951099780:2928152383 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1639951099780 Received: from jidanni.org (114-41-18-65.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [114.41.18.65]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a219.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JHGn65nFnz18q; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:58:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jidanni.org; s=jidanni.org; t=1639951098; bh=VZ6tWx1UED1VbcSi+ebkG1zeVPU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=dmtmIVT0PqRUW6QjHiw7xh4S94BSP/5n816RLuoiAmUuStvASB/gJvm60rMwPHHrK R08RZsHpBh5rnWejpGY3Ez/HRrfaLuLGyFfGo8mGGM3D9z8qyPOviQFELIUVR6X2l4 0CrN94gpHpO2Okjewrpyj6APAGn6xOUq92gBzgMo= From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#52484: Don't beep/flash as part of a response to a question References: <87bl1j86vd.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87ee68sqdq.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 05:58:15 +0800 Message-ID: <87ilvkxnns.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52484 Cc: 52484@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> "LI" == Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: LI> 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes: >> When prompted: >> A compilation process is running; kill it? (yes or no) >> if we say "no", >> our screen flashes, like we were a bad boy, >> and we see >> "Cannot have two processes in ‘*compilation*’ at once" >> OK, but why the beep/flash "spanking"? LI> When you type "no" it proceeds, and then errors out. The error will LI> beep at you, so everything here seems to be working as designed, and I'm LI> closing this bug report. "You can't have two cars on the same one lane road. Proceed? (yes, no)." No. (And then you redirect him over the cliff instead of just pressing the brake.) OK, never mind. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 19 19:22:52 2021 Received: (at 52484) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2021 00:22:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48499 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz6S4-0003KQ-BX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:22:52 -0500 Received: from donkey.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.49]:33345) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz6S1-0003KE-BW for 52484@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 19:22:50 -0500 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9D7621E4F; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:22:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a264.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C0717621DEA; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:22:47 -0800 (PST) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a264.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.100.11.82 (trex/6.4.3); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:22:48 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Army-Gusty: 5d5d3e0f7143cab2_1639959768006_3029025639 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1639959768006:2852085107 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1639959768006 Received: from jidanni.org (114-41-18-65.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [114.41.18.65]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a264.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JHKzq41Hpz1Rg; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:22:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jidanni.org; s=jidanni.org; t=1639959767; bh=N8hY+naZOFsSFrI38oZqmynj7bU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Content-Type; b=CuCNibS1XJ5Ab6iP0Tk/7Hs/dsQvX5hJ4+mLnlAllNj/yPMl2HWPRi4wrAcR8oOVG ej/f6iMmiwCsnO2CzOGyVSVvd2OijIbzNGNVvPtNSoIaQsuPvQdpLKrNbHoWfe8uBG toQDp76qDM1tY1M3OZjLcgr+sYw9F193atYek9VM= From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#52484: Don't beep/flash as part of a response to a question References: <87bl1j86vd.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87ee68sqdq.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 08:22:44 +0800 Message-ID: <87lf0grup7.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52484 Cc: 52484@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Same broken behavior in Dired: File V_20211207_080008_vHDR_On.mp4 is large (27.7 MiB), really open? (y)es or (n)o or (l)iterally If we say "n" we get a flash or beep, and user-error: Aborted OK, but no need for the flash/beep. P.S., if we say y, then it assumes we want to see the bytes. But it should know we probably want to watch it as a movie. Sure we might not even have a movie player installed, but that's what most people want to do with mp4's. From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:32:35 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 12:24:11 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator