From unknown Sun Jun 15 07:59:20 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#52483 <52483@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#52483 <52483@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Reply-To: bug#52483 <52483@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 14:59:20 +0000 retitle 52483 GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption reassign 52483 guix submitter 52483 Leo Famulari severity 52483 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 14 11:46:31 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 16:46:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59377 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwd-0007VZ-N2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:31 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwX-0007V5-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwV-0004QN-SP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:21 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:54717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwT-0007iZ-VW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:19 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAF15C00DD; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= mesmtp; bh=NyHxbjxOLxgwKoy2gzyrfG+iRFMtDAcx9mSvgAzepI4=; b=AJEPg V5av0V5BZhmSxfwG0GEJz9sEZPkypuLm4QlMApFYvOv2MI7ya9vmty73iPJBCdfW aT6qpXbf/lS5GrlHjzyfcEGG2prEJCm26fOJAOttQe44PzFRyLi1zR6GAAO4Syw5 z7wV9PcMYf9PpStWZ0Sjlpp8s82irCxFE7Ru3Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=NyHxbjxOLxgwKoy2gzyrfG+iRFMtD Acx9mSvgAzepI4=; b=Yy/fjCItA9LCgnGrYh1rM6G+eB58VaLkbbi3fx4tbnmhs oXLvbMUcbSBi+1Ts4OzdogZgWGkACVQ4p97Y02hsV8l8CWjeGWScEqQXYtXX4H98 Ob/vnwsc/L9Kmj4ZSofITFRvULhcP9BOgkBkeNtevlecrqgkSfPo9Zm46OoRLHbL 2P5k5J3AkS55TUHNuLYmn7h6PaUPjNTZMd1Q/M0Ht99gq/x2a4KyNSKe5xr67ApZ OOvpFQcyX1zlmGalz/++h2A8rmn9MB4d6h/X7h7dnmKRB2yFah7Xxw/S17L0y4LY kVZavCFI6KRow2rXoQ8lMTl/BWuk3slE07qfU7rgQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledtgdelvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggusehgtderredttd dvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdr nhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefhteeuffffveduheejfeeggeelffdvffdvhe dvleffledtkedvleduudekfefgudenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhhpghdrohhrghdpghhn uhdrohhrghdpshhtrggtkhgvgigthhgrnhhgvgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgr mhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:12 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6Xc3uR5LPmFETree" Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) --6Xc3uR5LPmFETree Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gJGG8P8sag/4cacj" Content-Disposition: inline --gJGG8P8sag/4cacj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Our GnuPG package is version 2.2.30, which includes this bug: https://dev.gnupg.org/T5577 The effect of this bug is that symmetric encryption / decryption does not work. The bug was fixed in 2.2.31 and 2.3.3. Changing GnuPG will cause 2406 rebuilds. I think that's suboptimal but it's the situation. There is a gnupg-2.2.32 package, but it's hidden because it would break emacs-pinentry: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm?id=861ee6d908fefc47d765f81e33cdf6f84b6d50eb#n350 Here is a patch that unhides gnupg-2.2.32, updates it to 2.2.33, and makes emacs-pinentry use that package variant. If emacs-pinentry cannot use a current GnuPG, what should we do? And maybe we don't need emacs-pinentry anymore?: https://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/64721 --gJGG8P8sag/4cacj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-gnu-GnuPG-Update-gnupg-2.2.32-to-2.2.33.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom b80a537cb9529b2f186519684901fe2be9e0a0f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 =46rom: Leo Famulari Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:40:28 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: GnuPG: Update gnupg-2.2.32 to 2.2.33. * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg-2.2.32): Replace with ... (gnupg-2.2.33): ... new variable. * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-pinentry)[propagated-inputs]: Use gnupg-2.2.33. --- gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 2 +- gnu/packages/gnupg.scm | 13 +++---------- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm index 32915fb6ed..5ce07645ce 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm @@ -21238,7 +21238,7 @@ (define-public emacs-pinentry "1lf30q6r8nz5cjzclbb9bbymsk2y75nskvb55hnjdv93gr3j0sik")))) (build-system emacs-build-system) (propagated-inputs - (list gnupg)) + (list gnupg-2.2.33)) (home-page "https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/pinentry.html") (synopsis "GnuPG Pinentry server implementation") (description diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm b/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm index 665e9e3021..fc7c1fbee0 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm @@ -347,24 +347,17 @@ (define-public gnupg (properties '((ftp-server . "ftp.gnupg.org") (ftp-directory . "/gcrypt/gnupg"))))) =20 -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 +(define-public gnupg-2.2.33 (package (inherit gnupg) - (version "2.2.32") - - ;; Hide this version because packages like 'emacs-pinentry' propagate = the - ;; default GnuPG and "guix install gnupg emacs-pinentry" would fail wi= th a - ;; collision error. - (properties `((hidden? . #t) - ,@(package-properties gnupg))) - + (version "2.2.33") (source (origin (inherit (package-source gnupg)) (uri (string-append "mirror://gnupg/gnupg/gnupg-" version ".tar.bz2")) (sha256 (base32 - "0506gv54z10c96z5821z9p0ksibk1pfilsmag39ffqrcz0sinmxj"))))= )) + "1qz403080hwba8j8vpnfkvh7clg1dbg74kdn1d0p0g84iip87246"))))= )) =20 (define-public gnupg-1 (package (inherit gnupg) --=20 2.34.0 --gJGG8P8sag/4cacj-- --6Xc3uR5LPmFETree Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAmG4ylEACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgIoA/8CrX2kBUogCw4iu9Oq38/YcUeCLFv7SHyoZ9UqtmuDxTMini6sg4j4GcV Fx0NdYdHuhYvrJHmNus+0jqIHa1+BJ5YzEsGKwYldEY458FeQCYVh2fJqhzu0mMi MVBTa7ciHN5SpC8Bu73G2WRnUkJM7m8AoiOJP8KJjUZ1TCD2DHUdAAh6yrfuH3+0 cbYB52y/ld2KTkn/JkhmmSrh3xMjWweahIKQCaSYzleN/sLTw2CkMi8OZJB/4ERX BQXFGQ9wNTUD5cxHDK3sqvYa9FQs00Gu7gelsTGzvWphhWq+cCOBuDzeNxwdIyDT 0E5f0uwpDzgnqQQEPlNrtOhF5nAYkBZKiAQAGOf+aPRUPpXPk+OHXV5ImSiIoW6x BP5gZZDqswO0AgBoUipKtaklC9HZFH2vZD1qTfr5Ak+5DjZM1oaGML7QWQYY6bur 34GeM0OfHHrnZQSKKxMU9id3beLjjk/dlG8qLJBFXBNo21YeXdvgDLZaB9MY2Lek qfVzdTk8OfzrR4MrO8STsCuYy+xKTEi23fkXw/cE/HrQO4MS3u4ADYEBQzjFcgc8 82uRn9r0wN7tesCC4sywlvTjCtfOOUMdHgeLNTgLZLF09dUCXRi96gF4yDHj5/QF EmU61mw0Ru8JiDOisahx4i5sRZ0M1e491d+z4bkbrAcfZ9kaRQs= =rqWB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6Xc3uR5LPmFETree-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 14 12:32:41 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 17:32:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfN-0000IA-FI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:41 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:37904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfM-0000I3-FP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfM-0004HR-3b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:40 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:43279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfK-00063i-8p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:39 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDC95C0226; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=lNiV2KVsjkzun/qLU9uZ7/KU hgT6r7/3tqcvk4x6z5M=; b=k/aXu10PsnCSfyI0PvDCv4RlyTKEsn5rj7cRRwCl 50ehWwS9kxwvby30EgOqO8BGxvopCyH4IzWmrg/vEWb27yp/arwwPNyXEtRY5GHC wcX8Qso4TWQvL+FYPAk9bdT2yatTyge2n8oKsv+A1VL1qCidQAxEyX4nzz2xdJYQ CGk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=lNiV2K Vsjkzun/qLU9uZ7/KUhgT6r7/3tqcvk4x6z5M=; b=VxwrZwz1s339ktX+JMqqx6 RbpOQXePKFWrzUl+qlrcOKewy6M8eG3SoyDUfO3+P6ZwX28V3nSFkrmqQXTTFCAT Rc91aetfAwlBzxOa4W3yS56D9euMvGnQzpn5DmMqGXmD+HdsbO9i+m3BqlPwFPCb 8p+0DMEynvNDOUeL6/tqguavDJRHADgi68GNXXzMhMIMf+R6XKRH9/pR6Mx/PBa4 jQ85PhfiL9j9Z5fJDgu9HmHf0X+RF7TuS0XPPTS85Ew0bt9kQY9hR8NlTClaeZBN egiHXCN2sQFnYOjFVrBNaRDFlQeo3P4PH/zIB930K2D3DMWIqnvBDOkW739GAjKQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledtgddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudekveegteekleetgfeitdejgfejke ffudethedvhfeukeduleeikeejfeehffetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:31 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:46:12AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > Here is a patch that unhides gnupg-2.2.32, updates it to 2.2.33, and > makes emacs-pinentry use that package variant. After sending this patch, I noticed that gnupg-2.2.32 is also used by qgpgme. This bug was noticed earlier, but misinterpreted. Expect a v2 patch that uses 'gnupg-next' instead of gnupg-2.2.33, and adjusts all users accordingly. --CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAmG41SwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhNBxAA1uUiwq7QU6o5Nn44+QGILw/JHDvBD2mFEdoz/VFOU3EsNiYW5oRIlGYf +7gtKcnehOuZ27Ojg1IN99xm2vr/R+V49rQHZt1eRUc/pCVSu8Gy2AAnqXbAlpyW PY7kQbCqfFGjMpbq6b0rNxqUaPJZUd6/Jhmqp6a1/G9inPz+n3JeGBtC/kcl+5k4 Tp927thw+ZSS7OZX3HEI2OUYewgyXg8tRpg14BkQBm50sDQrJEXOhOD2TLoP62Ld 8T+SZNIHy68Mzgr1XqNeXAZxkL5vTNUYJYrCE0IPdYZEm+r/PXVVWejd+JDFcyl/ Xu8kNbme9i7QrPIlyr0m8gb0RRbVi5PWPHO6MLqT+A7jfIgjRaPw0B3yDbET8Vcr gtHP5FLkKa0FMvb6vPQtmBqKrLN3GS5omxanmMJn/Jv06IZDezYoBOg+Xrtdygrr UN1T4KHvwaI6mU9yJh2O7lJJ9pCrv9L8srkubg4CWGyLk84GufUcIQo+DyzpeEu+ NKs3GscPUEZ2hiekDZvWPnNT4olHvA4MI6G8CNsjKr9U1NRekUmQs5dQPgqeuuFa 0b36HIqd7mcZexghmK8cTdLohWpmouHAqlq5sT/uwdRwfoGejJ+onU8/WxHgsjdF 885WtUALCaeHFfAaYXEfFYHweUmwz0xSxBeLxu1ajGzNWt0RwMw= =BbfP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 14 12:33:54 2021 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 17:33:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBgX-0000Kf-Uw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:54 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:37999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBgW-0000KR-60 for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:52 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194E85C0234; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=zRh9vDz+LPfAdTHhLp4GnPJ fdxk1L6RMOZA4Tt/0Dlo=; b=FyjfYk6vkEdSOYkrvOcfjcV+Zy0iaxplI2HM0+L Trog58nuWA05nCXxNYIQ0vJNAUWeAQBviSvgNAGqbI11bufljxkGfEqicxUWXNAQ RxaSZJSvRiEnpYwjS6xynCR6ekezJUWmjbl6qBuIXegiRDikQ2VFjmXHsWu31LBl sNpI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:date:from :message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=zRh9vDz+LPfAdTHhL p4GnPJfdxk1L6RMOZA4Tt/0Dlo=; b=FgdoWBjK8M1Ew87VoRcSTrlG2MG+bl0qy KzthKZ/HM3sVivqN4ycR6MJYcx98T4rW+M14dgS89Bdzwx1a8sjQmV3YMXXhjS6F cYMNQVVUghTNqeZ+1rv8ZoaThpMKoCvP2RUH1zWMQL1ZQD2h8fxbC2C9xL3wsgWF z/VD+sBKOTBIlid+ytfZDgf0m/r+ZobdYzHEmYFOe0kqKJPkVoD6Dd7pSfjF4SSP /wT2kWuVmmZuMqPD9HNn4mqSp1OKqj66nhKgRDFxFK90ULOldsHhIFW1A93mL/q2 RdEuUg1MiwjxE9FKdcI6o4qeu39qtur5pIqPt8BrXxM+a2YFYL8oA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledtgddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkofgggfestdekredtre dttdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhi rdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveffueetleefteehheekgedvieeuvedtgf euudfhveefjeeghedthffggfelueegnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgpdhgnhhu phhgrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <52483@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:45 -0500 (EST) From: Leo Famulari To: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH v2] gnu: GnuPG: Update gnupg-2.2.32 to 2.2.33. Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:39 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg-2.2.32): Replace with ... (gnupg-next): ... new variable. (qgpgme)[native-inputs]: Replace gnupg-2.2.32 with gnupg-next. * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-pinentry)[propagated-inputs]: Use gnupg-next. --- gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 2 +- gnu/packages/gnupg.scm | 18 ++++-------------- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm index 32915fb6ed..b9818e92b9 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm @@ -21238,7 +21238,7 @@ (define-public emacs-pinentry "1lf30q6r8nz5cjzclbb9bbymsk2y75nskvb55hnjdv93gr3j0sik")))) (build-system emacs-build-system) (propagated-inputs - (list gnupg)) + (list gnupg-next)) (home-page "https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/pinentry.html") (synopsis "GnuPG Pinentry server implementation") (description diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm b/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm index 665e9e3021..78dc1e2276 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm @@ -347,24 +347,17 @@ (define-public gnupg (properties '((ftp-server . "ftp.gnupg.org") (ftp-directory . "/gcrypt/gnupg"))))) -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 +(define-public gnupg-next (package (inherit gnupg) - (version "2.2.32") - - ;; Hide this version because packages like 'emacs-pinentry' propagate the - ;; default GnuPG and "guix install gnupg emacs-pinentry" would fail with a - ;; collision error. - (properties `((hidden? . #t) - ,@(package-properties gnupg))) - + (version "2.2.33") (source (origin (inherit (package-source gnupg)) (uri (string-append "mirror://gnupg/gnupg/gnupg-" version ".tar.bz2")) (sha256 (base32 - "0506gv54z10c96z5821z9p0ksibk1pfilsmag39ffqrcz0sinmxj")))))) + "1qz403080hwba8j8vpnfkvh7clg1dbg74kdn1d0p0g84iip87246")))))) (define-public gnupg-1 (package (inherit gnupg) @@ -440,11 +433,8 @@ (define-public qgpgme (chdir "lang/qt") #t))))) (native-inputs - ;; Use GnuPG 2.2.32. With 2.2.30, 'testSymmetricEncryptDecrypt' in - ;; t-encrypt.cpp fails because 'gpg' wrongfully ask for a passphrase do - ;; decrypt the cypher text. (modify-inputs (package-native-inputs gpgme) - (replace "gnupg" gnupg-2.2.32) + (replace "gnupg" gnupg-next) (prepend pkg-config))) (inputs (modify-inputs (package-inputs gpgme) -- 2.34.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 17 12:32:24 2021 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2021 17:32:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40569 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myH5k-0000xI-Dh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:24 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:54757) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myH5e-0000wx-BJ for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:22 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94735C0211; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=9W368L15bD70PK8CjWv1lmDq AFWoVlJVnmtBtaxIaTM=; b=Xl4w8jQIfW0vp3RgoruK7EFUQHgJu7d++ya8S6KF S4K6UjRzQYfxNnBTOhG2hm8o7+MBF21f7bEkZOqxBDEUNmlSWcIUheCiFD1XiNPI FNuQp21SvdHL6QI/gHfohHh064NnDYyH+3N7u/djGdwI8ZBYpTZc4acybCkBD40h UCs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=9W368L 15bD70PK8CjWv1lmDqAFWoVlJVnmtBtaxIaTM=; b=QpbsBYLS80HKuP+usAzYZR iK53fXdSjNffD0oOm3OMPG5sY57BNGXNLMPrakWgc32MPU7Ksyidh6B8GLll6iuo PAWkApQrdZLrs+rgBcyU//6OdOx/+LiGb5bCdsln9NzR2R6tu4hgtOl8wBpNNlH6 6tk+Oj60CfmeeAK8TZgqgxJkVnScnpLhhw/J3mw4kZGYs/gOf5L9joZHg2cYZl2y ayGalptvI5jQWDhuXEOUeXW1uzEV7vkHqPpEOzfI29pwNCuPjgEbiIr/7RjrNvil N9+zOnfxhtw+cPnlTyhAdNz88nlgJ4p+un5uutfpO3LEX1oc28r7ph7/AZZB2SVw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrleeigddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhue efiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheffvefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <52483@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:10 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gnu: GnuPG: Update gnupg-2.2.32 to 2.2.33. Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:33:39PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 > +(define-public gnupg-next I noticed that this package variant omits the pinentry patch. In any case, I'm testing a full upgrade of gnupg to 2.2.33 for the version-1.4.0 branch. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 17 23:56:50 2021 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2021 04:56:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myRm6-0004cP-9m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 23:56:50 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f46.google.com ([209.85.219.46]:35465) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myRm4-0004cD-9o for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 23:56:49 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f46.google.com with SMTP id kj16so332913qvb.2 for <52483@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 20:56:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=lF/c/QaE4Ijf3OnRciQuRRIl9zETRzHfhdWSko6YQmw=; b=o3hPhTRUC6j38PSGJSpRjCP3MlD+ruEks3+vuoMF1eGeyWUTWBiceZpw+hLYXz3yqF 8A9sfJ4XBGehjMOTNxVuSkjMyRYKzEJ2z2v+92FRF5ksFuqA9DgEv3cVgYlNSIsCoH9I Sut7eOcdzbsTucuAMpMFNuIE0bFlY3Ws3AxjWmC6I+zk0+RwHXC6AtHld0PjbLzM3mmp +n+9cKthHfN/+faOB2eXbb192CGkQfeZN3hwRYVXQL+iH6Nh1AbaaWi6C4w/9SwSMbXW X3VG7JwYiBdx69AeY1V7ZtGT0X6WiNkSUBd7lgVzGZPXLlF1xpenaN0qb9qRKos4TdJd wOVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lF/c/QaE4Ijf3OnRciQuRRIl9zETRzHfhdWSko6YQmw=; b=OcdicDvuXJgmRNO9rzhnsQ7Q8FBJ/PU+C1mHw9SoQ+VqBeAKdUhLyn7sCdXKcu0wdh ou8/1A/I1IY1ioV2lsC+DaS1wLo4fYZNaVyroVvs4Aegp1ZWSzc8eXILHzlmWwrEROc5 GgOIEcgvlsIJCBuMdyotBtEQ7ztajTvxIp8eqBbz5FfL5BNy//ToLUEBVqqCELATDXvY 8EfQpyoQ7XJ9v/psrKbg+Wvkt6xp5r3neH+Wp+g3AwjHBtUXSlw6PEBr5oA1G8nV31kh +5bLstBS9dYzeOmx3s9eyMia6jb1G7zADBnWVhWGEXGcWvOYVsGJZuKCcN7kdiBc/x0v ZNpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rBvTvRxTZhvq7+fitnybWJVmeY7+n/WlOCksA+CRHj0vGlO6J L7N7NbzFn4Bmx4L1jN7X9k9j7jIJfGQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9JA6D6LZ/63E4mr7QJzWF5HJfkeqO9+KSQ/hXKZZ91wLRI88zw3QQ6Xd8hVOUZdeo0Guwug== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2523:: with SMTP id gg3mr5296176qvb.56.1639803402532; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 20:56:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd ([207.35.95.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s4sm6441041qko.47.2021.12.17.20.56.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 20:56:42 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 23:56:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:10 -0500") Message-ID: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483 Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi! Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:33:39PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 >> +(define-public gnupg-next > > I noticed that this package variant omits the pinentry patch. In any > case, I'm testing a full upgrade of gnupg to 2.2.33 for the version-1.4.0 > branch. I'm testing this: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.3.3. * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg): Update to 2.3.3. (gnupg-2.2.32): Delete variable. (qgpgme)[native-inputs]: Use the regular gnupg package. 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) gnu/packages/gnupg.scm | 32 ++++---------------------------- modified gnu/packages/gnupg.scm @@ -279,15 +279,15 @@ (define-public npth (define-public gnupg (package (name "gnupg") - (version "2.2.30") + (version "2.3.3") (source (origin (method url-fetch) - (uri (string-append "mirror://gnupg/gnupg/gnupg-" version + (uri (string-append "ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-" version ".tar.bz2")) (patches (search-patches "gnupg-default-pinentry.patch")) (sha256 (base32 - "1111ry31gaxv76miqsy6l0kwxwlx8sz0jk41jhyrjwx649p6sqyc")))) + "0dz9x0r5021bhk1kjh29m1q13xbslwb8yn9qzcp7b9m1lrnvi2ap")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (native-inputs (list pkg-config)) @@ -347,25 +347,6 @@ (define-public gnupg (properties '((ftp-server . "ftp.gnupg.org") (ftp-directory . "/gcrypt/gnupg"))))) -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 - (package - (inherit gnupg) - (version "2.2.32") - - ;; Hide this version because packages like 'emacs-pinentry' propagate the - ;; default GnuPG and "guix install gnupg emacs-pinentry" would fail with a - ;; collision error. - (properties `((hidden? . #t) - ,@(package-properties gnupg))) - - (source (origin - (inherit (package-source gnupg)) - (uri (string-append "mirror://gnupg/gnupg/gnupg-" version - ".tar.bz2")) - (sha256 - (base32 - "0506gv54z10c96z5821z9p0ksibk1pfilsmag39ffqrcz0sinmxj")))))) - (define-public gnupg-1 (package (inherit gnupg) (version "1.4.23") @@ -437,14 +418,9 @@ (define-public qgpgme "lang/cpp/src/libgpgmepp.la") (symlink (string-append gpgme "/lib/libgpgme.la") "src/libgpgme.la")) - (chdir "lang/qt") - #t))))) + (chdir "lang/qt")))))) (native-inputs - ;; Use GnuPG 2.2.32. With 2.2.30, 'testSymmetricEncryptDecrypt' in - ;; t-encrypt.cpp fails because 'gpg' wrongfully ask for a passphrase do - ;; decrypt the cypher text. (modify-inputs (package-native-inputs gpgme) - (replace "gnupg" gnupg-2.2.32) (prepend pkg-config))) (inputs (modify-inputs (package-inputs gpgme) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 18 18:53:11 2021 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2021 23:53:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myjVn-00037X-1O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:11 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:60743) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myjVl-00037L-Qv for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:10 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0476C32006F2; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=KhVJzW0jIP0UAdKc9uoAbODG ls6EdFpVTnRzH6Mz2nc=; b=dnUpU0EZMaG2JCi1l+w3ojm0NylEuVvnbfmXPvR0 xbuQz7g973T0y/nLpvxHdjr6pM7743Su3WQcJ3GrlJlapGKItoiIXaX2YSKGLcy7 NMAOSLR+QXjZDXd2c1VI/AiWUS/RSNbNeoIthLGzGifu0tISyirnI1aXyIeQgcuE +YI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=KhVJzW 0jIP0UAdKc9uoAbODGls6EdFpVTnRzH6Mz2nc=; b=jNI7m0F0Z/Q1v58kU/ELpb nG7NIxWQgWYS6tfpf/NeBSi5omzvrXvp/Ns8LIVQn8+et3Rqx7fYNM6K/H2fatny GgKf0TuwZB3n9WcWxheL5f+JEWTq0jQOH6u+Pdhl0Rz8OWEHkQvE4W8/YqDYcDXw guia0URy6HlR0QVe4tYGm5AVAV0gqvVwck48qZUIwo53ni529qBYjkx6JCZsVBrW yT29px7Q8qzZiRIBevVA1J/9punEeOirv81TAEYqPPPZOiotcJt9PlWlpE56VqVF B3RXg4gDaen/DzwwYYKbRIA1O7YhtSK5LsD2YQ0xl50dYh9C/0yBxSgjVUt68I4Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrleelgdduhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgr mhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheffvefg necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvoh esfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:01 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483 Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:56:41PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > I'm testing this: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.3.3. > > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg): Update to 2.3.3. > (gnupg-2.2.32): Delete variable. > (qgpgme)[native-inputs]: Use the regular gnupg package. Okay. Make sure to also adjust emacs-pinentry. I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG 2.2.32. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 18 20:32:53 2021 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 01:32:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44560 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myl4G-0005XC-RW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 20:32:53 -0500 Received: from wp224.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.231]:45102) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myl4F-0005X2-BD for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 20:32:51 -0500 Received: from www.rohleder.de ([37.61.204.227]); authenticated by wp224.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1myl4D-0005Xi-AZ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 02:32:49 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (helo=micha) by www.rohleder.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1myl3t-0005Qq-So; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 02:32:48 +0100 From: Michael Rohleder To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption References: Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 02:32:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:12 -0500") Message-ID: <875yrlbcqo.fsf@rohleder.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;mike@rohleder.de;1639877571;8a357c52; X-HE-SMSGID: 1myl4D-0005Xi-AZ X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483 Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari writes: > If emacs-pinentry cannot use a current GnuPG, what should we do? And > maybe we don't need emacs-pinentry anymore?: > > https://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/64721 > I don't think emacs-pinentry is needed, because adding "allow-emacs-pinentry" to gpg-agent.conf worked (for me) (at least) since several years in (guix) emacs w/o using emacs-pinentry (or other emacs customization). =2D-- Wir kommen nackt auf diese Welt und atmen ein. Wir atmen aus und verlassen diese Welt mit leeren H=C3=A4nden. und dazwischen gestalten wir unser Leben. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFFBAEBCAAvFiEEdV4t5dDVhcUueCgwfHr/vv7yyyUFAmG+i78RHG1pa2VAcm9o bGVkZXIuZGUACgkQfHr/vv7yyyXdegf7B2ghPt9jAkWEECnhsTx3hzkWV/ClDplb xWX7s7hMqFqf0yVw5ab3vNGoQg4fRaTUwflK/W/rfEFaZw6Sewa7uW/3M+EBD+lq uikXoeNOeaZCUedatBa0dOJy3/vOsHa0Up6KktiL+BvTDGrku8rJT3Bfs57tvOmS xYGLF+plXfWi9FwtVc9MhGRS36DnZDyA5v9pj9weA3JE3cCiE4RN6RQMTxECHkko ytxnyRgH/8OwV+beGyVtA0KoYLQNUdcnJxa3p4czpy3OEO0JhHDTT8JSi8UVzblU BJDhYIoxWVTB1bJBCSfydcmeSBWNnqTPioAZBixus09fROSh9DDNYg== =CqSh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 19 15:25:51 2021 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 20:25:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2kg-0005hD-Vo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:25:51 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f182.google.com ([209.85.160.182]:45856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2kf-0005gz-IH for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:25:49 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f182.google.com with SMTP id p19so7997663qtw.12 for <52483@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:25:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=L3pbpHrXM0lxzWcaAhpmyVFDYgPZm4kuHXomr6qMMsk=; b=QM+lcWTeNLxRKydSHQi6HWuMIpeQ6W3zp3AFJwOQsEaFw5byhs9dOCsgn00fgU0NVL puWpYiNjoh/ytmztBIdiV7bqedvWBJfhAIbDteJEDVwD3EuMSw+NWK7if7KcVo6ITw45 bj5EG/WieU1vD6XA+fDACcqWSjtFO72rOHH6G/0h4MK60FRm60Apt6FawKuvKvsN85Jz ICCI39WdHZ54RBh81RtANkA8vi+tQ/Exf4EL+OJOSt/8ogrXkbhaGjnc5NQUkOYpAk2U 64L7XdQ7IGx1HzsL7FP4YitCSKhlTYHpVrBMRyxu6R+tFnk/jRuPsr4EHb3pvG0WxQcg sXUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=L3pbpHrXM0lxzWcaAhpmyVFDYgPZm4kuHXomr6qMMsk=; b=kG8soRgmP+fYUM9Cw7mAJWOSEXWDw8zfcmwcbSJxGm2nQ98TV/xh3Z2kLb/eEhl+44 c6am7OG6Up8NCb9FVKxl9jQGV9ENClt25E9guMcrdvB/2I1jdTwtbPz/CdYqYKa1v45g 6tjKhbx307LIP3SfIwl4NJNuaTxAvHneiHz/Na+k+ns5iRQITfXzExqlEVry0Ac/jG1c f61FMvnuQCSpMaX+BnU8ZzRaUF4YsYWA8+b2vdjBew3UqLEjoga8z9ZDv81Gzpj3Q5ru L/SOTsTlevzQuxhufcwIush6ioDeYj8wvRTmMCWO5w8yAaH/miWjoE24PfhUbJPf+9Uu kOjA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533A9Bspc0xG69zLdccrx7+/cjJPQMyWcS6IOlM9OuyBxYzZZ15g 2NOrL0TZBi+TCjlZOXiOYaggVlGVWMc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9Wud0TReDh8pALnWbFBG55i5dSu7CeKgkoeqI0h440Y75NY7R4dx7SlTHV+rQW3eEJ0rfDA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:164e:: with SMTP id y14mr10122154qtj.651.1639945543995; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:25:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-133-19.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.133.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2sm13121689qta.11.2021.12.19.12.25.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:25:43 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:25:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:01 -0500") Message-ID: <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483 Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Leo, Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:56:41PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> I'm testing this: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.3.3. >> >> * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg): Update to 2.3.3. >> (gnupg-2.2.32): Delete variable. >> (qgpgme)[native-inputs]: Use the regular gnupg package. > > Okay. Make sure to also adjust emacs-pinentry. > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > 2.2.32. I ended up sticking with 2.2.33, since this is the current "LTS" release. Unfortunately it fails 3 new tests of python-gnupg, and its author think it is a regression in GnuPG itself [0]. [0] https://github.com/vsajip/python-gnupg/issues/163 We'll see what upstream has to say about it. Thank you, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 19 15:33:27 2021 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 20:33:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48293 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2s3-0005uS-0W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:27 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:60459) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2s0-0005uE-PL for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:25 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B743200A64; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=Wf29vl2tHtggQ9DbprunWicg eOYeoEaWC9vk0vjhcNw=; b=jidguiwbVX6W3F+G5MbqrmrcL3Ir1AWN+VNqoCQz epAWwdNyFSc9+cFfJ7Z0jAHl9djPLKJSvxmWzcSAG1P0iwxM5KhWFajXvX4Lhvgl o+WKaBWv7MhnbANW+9cbKjlDK0IVFaujnfx2LEHnrKXevHne+mNJql63ZKKrpomx MXY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Wf29vl 2tHtggQ9DbprunWicgeOYeoEaWC9vk0vjhcNw=; b=nA+NiE2BuGeuVy2tPrIJGP 4MOph850Cx9iah24vm09IsNK7lf42PqxbQPHmaslPn1Kv5xXJYJdk7X6jki9h3Ef Dmmmbl7EYJgCDThXDIyrgCfJ1R93vD9ugVaBtcgpHEMdCszfpIkmG5l6YHx6doIL HfIfK8dla18B+ex0HdVhxFH8i1ZK6vyyJNBskn+rPYmg54tcYSV/KH+dmaf/FGq+ IerYL5rLMWS4Bvx2nzs7+Tny+S06QM7KBiaBLOn+98kBfT1ejfONFvEi1HJ2j9L4 FutFtNxB1D0fy0l9d3e2u8zu+rs7WXecknOqO372MX6lakBs5ulJLp9pPBVgdudA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddttddgudegtdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhephefgleevhfdttdefheeitdfgheffffffledvlefhgfektdethefguefgheeg tefhnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:16 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483 Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > I ended up sticking with 2.2.33, since this is the current "LTS" > release. Unfortunately it fails 3 new tests of python-gnupg, and its > author think it is a regression in GnuPG itself [0]. > > [0] https://github.com/vsajip/python-gnupg/issues/163 Right, this is why I used 2.2.32. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 19 15:36:36 2021 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 20:36:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2v6-0005zd-0K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:36 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:32799) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2v4-0005zQ-3x for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:34 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE3432009BD; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=3fgZhrRh74ceoJPE/SisiCfu LUe/D0pg5scxzwWQQRg=; b=nhyPGYGQ+FdLE18Jdc+JQ2Aeo2M8iQdke6C0qnd4 GUNo5I1DN6tiFgv88nzPw834MY7yxuG44AX2H/2YuHyJItqAm5o0kQ1FYQ53ndsY MyjXB3SPyCD8bBthmAZ95BdHXuAC8gJAAtc6mQjmoTlMlzv1aJAkQLvbNF+v2BSD /RA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=3fgZhr Rh74ceoJPE/SisiCfuLUe/D0pg5scxzwWQQRg=; b=emahvDgeMLCgPYjnuwW46B 8dAgx4gu9VUf85IMKBLuTDZRYgx+z50WDHEAzcMyD9ewV8xLZM69e8g+2mkeBOoJ j0Irpze0AcbdLKDoMxkIJr6H8rK7/PjykwSyICX4flgQym4n+V6xSAjI3OEFtC3P RZzHu2lCtFPZqkoyDHvByijT1knluW+N/MZxWMDtWMkxFCAnaHZ4C3Segybv30fK Ap7Q5R4q5B8KQ4NNlf+dfHtLCzqXZfCtAT8EwGHhpkUtm8OuY4YQSUh/EwSC2w7c i3lk5LnpxY4INBpruRKAh+UvCxpEt/xIvrQtRPqJ4W6A990eI+rqvM6NjZEk5fFA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddttddgudegudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheff vefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:25 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483 Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > > 2.2.32. I see that my message was confusing, with mixed up version numbers. There's no regressions on x86_64 with 2.2.32. Since it fixes this bug, I'd like to make it available soon. Maybe we can unhide the gnupg-2.2.32 variable, and remove emacs-pinentry, since everyone is saying that it's no longer useful. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 22 19:01:24 2021 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2021 00:01:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60045 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0BXv-0000hW-Qw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:24 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:48559) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0BXu-0000hH-Ce for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:22 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF685C016A; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=Cb1Sspz9MQsg+95otJu6hhkI +2oDj82QItcnZJYBPW4=; b=JqVSrQNLMrGlAIJ6IzpGO4qoOvWZN6b8h+YF2Wuw fjHLxfwLOnBg55bLWSNv/ncR0MKpKFaPOHTMkVlBGamDtvxCR1zcq5seuFZcTED1 6sMMPTC1zytaKfPiRklCqz6eHhF8qMqhpA1uPvgO1FXdi1qL/24fTsdBFTrZsk1i aMM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Cb1Ssp z9MQsg+95otJu6hhkI+2oDj82QItcnZJYBPW4=; b=a2gurMF1qIKMiUn1kpcdXh frCbC2+4ALL75SWa3/0/CbO84TucnYs0znWwVWa2SWWtYwDO9flVngCQ7A82BC5D fFdw9/eQ4S1FmuaGKlXK6gG0mjGX6Xyjls5xHWytOZLkewleoKrBYppCZoMOTvTe y0Y/U0UcN381I68Sb5hsRcmzaRbyI1QSJsNAg3N13s0iSbNOsC0jib24xGt8ES2Q X3kToZkC5B0aqcMTHaDlXkC/Jxbs5NC/IF9iWkF2rlCaE/4DGcCa1jdqKx+D0u6n iQ2lrNGBYEQeLhxABbWg9nb7yEF1KHyAFdUuuUbJlYeFkzx3JS5gjvHhrCqnWBbg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddtjedgudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhffgkeeikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudff ieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:15 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483 Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:36:25PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > > > 2.2.32. > > I see that my message was confusing, with mixed up version numbers. > There's no regressions on x86_64 with 2.2.32. Since it fixes this bug, > I'd like to make it available soon. Maybe we can unhide the gnupg-2.2.32 > variable, and remove emacs-pinentry, since everyone is saying that it's > no longer useful. Here are patches for this: From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 26 17:46:50 2021 Received: (at 52483-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2021 22:46:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n1cHy-0003P5-Nx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:50 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:44907) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n1cHx-0003Op-75 for 52483-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:49 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C0D3200A16; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=J7M0osnYs3osl/GHfl79nXnY Py7xq8TPFrm+7wYficQ=; b=WExc3xzEA2z0Fm45+ABGPBQ9g9k0C00OiS/slmfe ZbvOtf8vvg6okEo/A9U9hlaTIPpai5Hf0WjhU25VbZPWlFLy9qROZuwrEj2Ss/SY X1WR7U8NMvScIpPl2Rbo+pW142UdyGJvidVD2OU+of/QolVfrv3f06vaxnszuQaw HOU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=J7M0os nYs3osl/GHfl79nXnYPy7xq8TPFrm+7wYficQ=; b=OC56CXTAxH/U6mKDSGAxHN G9XdPivmfC4BuLgp5JVzvK2w9kCo4TJiHv62IyIt+R9H7LvRWU3Or9wP8wpu9e6E VhocyUxDpxOpBWsBcoX87uvBb0SAMClKeOhXvD1gcCc+w7pXgnG7LlyLUVqkld7d uhoGel+FfL0JFkJSL2fFB8fu60/hNNDGpkW1i84cyV9knT42gKYNLjjmW95SffT0 K0hUFgy/eCEL0wSk3K0exWLmS3UbHlrd9FiAflQ2Tjhl7o0n1MwOP7aVcaJ+CyWT SmNAUfx6MCkxSUZER/ygAoDwSJeq/07t6M331ttEFokOWz3GiLJQYv9rQwNZrmGA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddugedgjeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhfeufeeivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffev gfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvg hosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:41 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483-done Cc: 52483-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:36:25PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > > > 2.2.32. > > I see that my message was confusing, with mixed up version numbers. > There's no regressions on x86_64 with 2.2.32. Since it fixes this bug, > I'd like to make it available soon. Maybe we can unhide the gnupg-2.2.32 > variable, and remove emacs-pinentry, since everyone is saying that it's > no longer useful. I pushed commit d03aa942d, which makes GnuPG 2.2.32 available in the UI. I didn't remove emacs-pinentry... that's something that Emacs users should decide how to handle. From unknown Sun Jun 15 07:59:20 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:24:12 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator