From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.163950039128875 (code B ref -1); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:47:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 16:46:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59377 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwd-0007VZ-N2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:31 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwX-0007V5-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwV-0004QN-SP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:21 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:54717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwT-0007iZ-VW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:19 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAF15C00DD; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= mesmtp; bh=NyHxbjxOLxgwKoy2gzyrfG+iRFMtDAcx9mSvgAzepI4=; b=AJEPg V5av0V5BZhmSxfwG0GEJz9sEZPkypuLm4QlMApFYvOv2MI7ya9vmty73iPJBCdfW aT6qpXbf/lS5GrlHjzyfcEGG2prEJCm26fOJAOttQe44PzFRyLi1zR6GAAO4Syw5 z7wV9PcMYf9PpStWZ0Sjlpp8s82irCxFE7Ru3Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=NyHxbjxOLxgwKoy2gzyrfG+iRFMtD Acx9mSvgAzepI4=; b=Yy/fjCItA9LCgnGrYh1rM6G+eB58VaLkbbi3fx4tbnmhs oXLvbMUcbSBi+1Ts4OzdogZgWGkACVQ4p97Y02hsV8l8CWjeGWScEqQXYtXX4H98 Ob/vnwsc/L9Kmj4ZSofITFRvULhcP9BOgkBkeNtevlecrqgkSfPo9Zm46OoRLHbL 2P5k5J3AkS55TUHNuLYmn7h6PaUPjNTZMd1Q/M0Ht99gq/x2a4KyNSKe5xr67ApZ OOvpFQcyX1zlmGalz/++h2A8rmn9MB4d6h/X7h7dnmKRB2yFah7Xxw/S17L0y4LY kVZavCFI6KRow2rXoQ8lMTl/BWuk3slE07qfU7rgQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledtgdelvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggusehgtderredttd dvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdr nhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefhteeuffffveduheejfeeggeelffdvffdvhe dvleffledtkedvleduudekfefgudenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhhpghdrohhrghdpghhn uhdrohhrghdpshhtrggtkhgvgigthhgrnhhgvgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgr mhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:12 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6Xc3uR5LPmFETree" Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) --6Xc3uR5LPmFETree Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gJGG8P8sag/4cacj" Content-Disposition: inline --gJGG8P8sag/4cacj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Our GnuPG package is version 2.2.30, which includes this bug: https://dev.gnupg.org/T5577 The effect of this bug is that symmetric encryption / decryption does not work. The bug was fixed in 2.2.31 and 2.3.3. Changing GnuPG will cause 2406 rebuilds. I think that's suboptimal but it's the situation. There is a gnupg-2.2.32 package, but it's hidden because it would break emacs-pinentry: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm?id=861ee6d908fefc47d765f81e33cdf6f84b6d50eb#n350 Here is a patch that unhides gnupg-2.2.32, updates it to 2.2.33, and makes emacs-pinentry use that package variant. If emacs-pinentry cannot use a current GnuPG, what should we do? And maybe we don't need emacs-pinentry anymore?: https://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/64721 --gJGG8P8sag/4cacj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-gnu-GnuPG-Update-gnupg-2.2.32-to-2.2.33.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom b80a537cb9529b2f186519684901fe2be9e0a0f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 =46rom: Leo Famulari Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:40:28 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: GnuPG: Update gnupg-2.2.32 to 2.2.33. * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg-2.2.32): Replace with ... (gnupg-2.2.33): ... new variable. * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-pinentry)[propagated-inputs]: Use gnupg-2.2.33. --- gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 2 +- gnu/packages/gnupg.scm | 13 +++---------- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm index 32915fb6ed..5ce07645ce 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm @@ -21238,7 +21238,7 @@ (define-public emacs-pinentry "1lf30q6r8nz5cjzclbb9bbymsk2y75nskvb55hnjdv93gr3j0sik")))) (build-system emacs-build-system) (propagated-inputs - (list gnupg)) + (list gnupg-2.2.33)) (home-page "https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/pinentry.html") (synopsis "GnuPG Pinentry server implementation") (description diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm b/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm index 665e9e3021..fc7c1fbee0 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm @@ -347,24 +347,17 @@ (define-public gnupg (properties '((ftp-server . "ftp.gnupg.org") (ftp-directory . "/gcrypt/gnupg"))))) =20 -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 +(define-public gnupg-2.2.33 (package (inherit gnupg) - (version "2.2.32") - - ;; Hide this version because packages like 'emacs-pinentry' propagate = the - ;; default GnuPG and "guix install gnupg emacs-pinentry" would fail wi= th a - ;; collision error. - (properties `((hidden? . #t) - ,@(package-properties gnupg))) - + (version "2.2.33") (source (origin (inherit (package-source gnupg)) (uri (string-append "mirror://gnupg/gnupg/gnupg-" version ".tar.bz2")) (sha256 (base32 - "0506gv54z10c96z5821z9p0ksibk1pfilsmag39ffqrcz0sinmxj"))))= )) + "1qz403080hwba8j8vpnfkvh7clg1dbg74kdn1d0p0g84iip87246"))))= )) =20 (define-public gnupg-1 (package (inherit gnupg) --=20 2.34.0 --gJGG8P8sag/4cacj-- --6Xc3uR5LPmFETree Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAmG4ylEACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgIoA/8CrX2kBUogCw4iu9Oq38/YcUeCLFv7SHyoZ9UqtmuDxTMini6sg4j4GcV Fx0NdYdHuhYvrJHmNus+0jqIHa1+BJ5YzEsGKwYldEY458FeQCYVh2fJqhzu0mMi MVBTa7ciHN5SpC8Bu73G2WRnUkJM7m8AoiOJP8KJjUZ1TCD2DHUdAAh6yrfuH3+0 cbYB52y/ld2KTkn/JkhmmSrh3xMjWweahIKQCaSYzleN/sLTw2CkMi8OZJB/4ERX BQXFGQ9wNTUD5cxHDK3sqvYa9FQs00Gu7gelsTGzvWphhWq+cCOBuDzeNxwdIyDT 0E5f0uwpDzgnqQQEPlNrtOhF5nAYkBZKiAQAGOf+aPRUPpXPk+OHXV5ImSiIoW6x BP5gZZDqswO0AgBoUipKtaklC9HZFH2vZD1qTfr5Ak+5DjZM1oaGML7QWQYY6bur 34GeM0OfHHrnZQSKKxMU9id3beLjjk/dlG8qLJBFXBNo21YeXdvgDLZaB9MY2Lek qfVzdTk8OfzrR4MrO8STsCuYy+xKTEi23fkXw/cE/HrQO4MS3u4ADYEBQzjFcgc8 82uRn9r0wN7tesCC4sywlvTjCtfOOUMdHgeLNTgLZLF09dUCXRi96gF4yDHj5/QF EmU61mw0Ru8JiDOisahx4i5sRZ0M1e491d+z4bkbrAcfZ9kaRQs= =rqWB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6Xc3uR5LPmFETree-- From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16395031611130 (code B ref -1); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:33:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 17:32:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfN-0000IA-FI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:41 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:37904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfM-0000I3-FP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfM-0004HR-3b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:40 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:43279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBfK-00063i-8p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:39 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDC95C0226; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=lNiV2KVsjkzun/qLU9uZ7/KU hgT6r7/3tqcvk4x6z5M=; b=k/aXu10PsnCSfyI0PvDCv4RlyTKEsn5rj7cRRwCl 50ehWwS9kxwvby30EgOqO8BGxvopCyH4IzWmrg/vEWb27yp/arwwPNyXEtRY5GHC wcX8Qso4TWQvL+FYPAk9bdT2yatTyge2n8oKsv+A1VL1qCidQAxEyX4nzz2xdJYQ CGk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=lNiV2K Vsjkzun/qLU9uZ7/KUhgT6r7/3tqcvk4x6z5M=; b=VxwrZwz1s339ktX+JMqqx6 RbpOQXePKFWrzUl+qlrcOKewy6M8eG3SoyDUfO3+P6ZwX28V3nSFkrmqQXTTFCAT Rc91aetfAwlBzxOa4W3yS56D9euMvGnQzpn5DmMqGXmD+HdsbO9i+m3BqlPwFPCb 8p+0DMEynvNDOUeL6/tqguavDJRHADgi68GNXXzMhMIMf+R6XKRH9/pR6Mx/PBa4 jQ85PhfiL9j9Z5fJDgu9HmHf0X+RF7TuS0XPPTS85Ew0bt9kQY9hR8NlTClaeZBN egiHXCN2sQFnYOjFVrBNaRDFlQeo3P4PH/zIB930K2D3DMWIqnvBDOkW739GAjKQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledtgddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtre ertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudekveegteekleetgfeitdejgfejke ffudethedvhfeukeduleeikeejfeehffetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:32:31 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:46:12AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > Here is a patch that unhides gnupg-2.2.32, updates it to 2.2.33, and > makes emacs-pinentry use that package variant. After sending this patch, I noticed that gnupg-2.2.32 is also used by qgpgme. This bug was noticed earlier, but misinterpreted. Expect a v2 patch that uses 'gnupg-next' instead of gnupg-2.2.33, and adjusts all users accordingly. --CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAmG41SwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhNBxAA1uUiwq7QU6o5Nn44+QGILw/JHDvBD2mFEdoz/VFOU3EsNiYW5oRIlGYf +7gtKcnehOuZ27Ojg1IN99xm2vr/R+V49rQHZt1eRUc/pCVSu8Gy2AAnqXbAlpyW PY7kQbCqfFGjMpbq6b0rNxqUaPJZUd6/Jhmqp6a1/G9inPz+n3JeGBtC/kcl+5k4 Tp927thw+ZSS7OZX3HEI2OUYewgyXg8tRpg14BkQBm50sDQrJEXOhOD2TLoP62Ld 8T+SZNIHy68Mzgr1XqNeXAZxkL5vTNUYJYrCE0IPdYZEm+r/PXVVWejd+JDFcyl/ Xu8kNbme9i7QrPIlyr0m8gb0RRbVi5PWPHO6MLqT+A7jfIgjRaPw0B3yDbET8Vcr gtHP5FLkKa0FMvb6vPQtmBqKrLN3GS5omxanmMJn/Jv06IZDezYoBOg+Xrtdygrr UN1T4KHvwaI6mU9yJh2O7lJJ9pCrv9L8srkubg4CWGyLk84GufUcIQo+DyzpeEu+ NKs3GscPUEZ2hiekDZvWPnNT4olHvA4MI6G8CNsjKr9U1NRekUmQs5dQPgqeuuFa 0b36HIqd7mcZexghmK8cTdLohWpmouHAqlq5sT/uwdRwfoGejJ+onU8/WxHgsjdF 885WtUALCaeHFfAaYXEfFYHweUmwz0xSxBeLxu1ajGzNWt0RwMw= =BbfP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CHjMzBYbr9RBi//q-- From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: [PATCH v2] gnu: GnuPG: Update gnupg-2.2.32 to 2.2.33. References: In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52483.16395032341285 (code B ref 52483); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:34:02 +0000 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 17:33:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBgX-0000Kf-Uw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:54 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:37999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxBgW-0000KR-60 for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:52 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194E85C0234; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=zRh9vDz+LPfAdTHhLp4GnPJ fdxk1L6RMOZA4Tt/0Dlo=; b=FyjfYk6vkEdSOYkrvOcfjcV+Zy0iaxplI2HM0+L Trog58nuWA05nCXxNYIQ0vJNAUWeAQBviSvgNAGqbI11bufljxkGfEqicxUWXNAQ RxaSZJSvRiEnpYwjS6xynCR6ekezJUWmjbl6qBuIXegiRDikQ2VFjmXHsWu31LBl sNpI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:date:from :message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=zRh9vDz+LPfAdTHhL p4GnPJfdxk1L6RMOZA4Tt/0Dlo=; b=FgdoWBjK8M1Ew87VoRcSTrlG2MG+bl0qy KzthKZ/HM3sVivqN4ycR6MJYcx98T4rW+M14dgS89Bdzwx1a8sjQmV3YMXXhjS6F cYMNQVVUghTNqeZ+1rv8ZoaThpMKoCvP2RUH1zWMQL1ZQD2h8fxbC2C9xL3wsgWF z/VD+sBKOTBIlid+ytfZDgf0m/r+ZobdYzHEmYFOe0kqKJPkVoD6Dd7pSfjF4SSP /wT2kWuVmmZuMqPD9HNn4mqSp1OKqj66nhKgRDFxFK90ULOldsHhIFW1A93mL/q2 RdEuUg1MiwjxE9FKdcI6o4qeu39qtur5pIqPt8BrXxM+a2YFYL8oA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledtgddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkofgggfestdekredtre dttdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhi rdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveffueetleefteehheekgedvieeuvedtgf euudfhveefjeeghedthffggfelueegnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgpdhgnhhu phhgrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <52483@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:45 -0500 (EST) From: Leo Famulari Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:33:39 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg-2.2.32): Replace with ... (gnupg-next): ... new variable. (qgpgme)[native-inputs]: Replace gnupg-2.2.32 with gnupg-next. * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-pinentry)[propagated-inputs]: Use gnupg-next. --- gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 2 +- gnu/packages/gnupg.scm | 18 ++++-------------- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm index 32915fb6ed..b9818e92b9 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm @@ -21238,7 +21238,7 @@ (define-public emacs-pinentry "1lf30q6r8nz5cjzclbb9bbymsk2y75nskvb55hnjdv93gr3j0sik")))) (build-system emacs-build-system) (propagated-inputs - (list gnupg)) + (list gnupg-next)) (home-page "https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/pinentry.html") (synopsis "GnuPG Pinentry server implementation") (description diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm b/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm index 665e9e3021..78dc1e2276 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm @@ -347,24 +347,17 @@ (define-public gnupg (properties '((ftp-server . "ftp.gnupg.org") (ftp-directory . "/gcrypt/gnupg"))))) -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 +(define-public gnupg-next (package (inherit gnupg) - (version "2.2.32") - - ;; Hide this version because packages like 'emacs-pinentry' propagate the - ;; default GnuPG and "guix install gnupg emacs-pinentry" would fail with a - ;; collision error. - (properties `((hidden? . #t) - ,@(package-properties gnupg))) - + (version "2.2.33") (source (origin (inherit (package-source gnupg)) (uri (string-append "mirror://gnupg/gnupg/gnupg-" version ".tar.bz2")) (sha256 (base32 - "0506gv54z10c96z5821z9p0ksibk1pfilsmag39ffqrcz0sinmxj")))))) + "1qz403080hwba8j8vpnfkvh7clg1dbg74kdn1d0p0g84iip87246")))))) (define-public gnupg-1 (package (inherit gnupg) @@ -440,11 +433,8 @@ (define-public qgpgme (chdir "lang/qt") #t))))) (native-inputs - ;; Use GnuPG 2.2.32. With 2.2.30, 'testSymmetricEncryptDecrypt' in - ;; t-encrypt.cpp fails because 'gpg' wrongfully ask for a passphrase do - ;; decrypt the cypher text. (modify-inputs (package-native-inputs gpgme) - (replace "gnupg" gnupg-2.2.32) + (replace "gnupg" gnupg-next) (prepend pkg-config))) (inputs (modify-inputs (package-inputs gpgme) -- 2.34.0 From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: [PATCH v2] gnu: GnuPG: Update gnupg-2.2.32 to 2.2.33. Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52483.16397623443680 (code B ref 52483); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2021 17:32:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40569 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myH5k-0000xI-Dh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:24 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:54757) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myH5e-0000wx-BJ for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:22 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94735C0211; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=9W368L15bD70PK8CjWv1lmDq AFWoVlJVnmtBtaxIaTM=; b=Xl4w8jQIfW0vp3RgoruK7EFUQHgJu7d++ya8S6KF S4K6UjRzQYfxNnBTOhG2hm8o7+MBF21f7bEkZOqxBDEUNmlSWcIUheCiFD1XiNPI FNuQp21SvdHL6QI/gHfohHh064NnDYyH+3N7u/djGdwI8ZBYpTZc4acybCkBD40h UCs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=9W368L 15bD70PK8CjWv1lmDqAFWoVlJVnmtBtaxIaTM=; b=QpbsBYLS80HKuP+usAzYZR iK53fXdSjNffD0oOm3OMPG5sY57BNGXNLMPrakWgc32MPU7Ksyidh6B8GLll6iuo PAWkApQrdZLrs+rgBcyU//6OdOx/+LiGb5bCdsln9NzR2R6tu4hgtOl8wBpNNlH6 6tk+Oj60CfmeeAK8TZgqgxJkVnScnpLhhw/J3mw4kZGYs/gOf5L9joZHg2cYZl2y ayGalptvI5jQWDhuXEOUeXW1uzEV7vkHqPpEOzfI29pwNCuPjgEbiIr/7RjrNvil N9+zOnfxhtw+cPnlTyhAdNz88nlgJ4p+un5uutfpO3LEX1oc28r7ph7/AZZB2SVw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrleeigddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhue efiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheffvefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <52483@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:10 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:33:39PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 > +(define-public gnupg-next I noticed that this package variant omits the pinentry patch. In any case, I'm testing a full upgrade of gnupg to 2.2.33 for the version-1.4.0 branch. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 04:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52483.163980341017763 (code B ref 52483); Sat, 18 Dec 2021 04:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2021 04:56:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myRm6-0004cP-9m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 23:56:50 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f46.google.com ([209.85.219.46]:35465) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myRm4-0004cD-9o for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 23:56:49 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f46.google.com with SMTP id kj16so332913qvb.2 for <52483@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 20:56:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=lF/c/QaE4Ijf3OnRciQuRRIl9zETRzHfhdWSko6YQmw=; b=o3hPhTRUC6j38PSGJSpRjCP3MlD+ruEks3+vuoMF1eGeyWUTWBiceZpw+hLYXz3yqF 8A9sfJ4XBGehjMOTNxVuSkjMyRYKzEJ2z2v+92FRF5ksFuqA9DgEv3cVgYlNSIsCoH9I Sut7eOcdzbsTucuAMpMFNuIE0bFlY3Ws3AxjWmC6I+zk0+RwHXC6AtHld0PjbLzM3mmp +n+9cKthHfN/+faOB2eXbb192CGkQfeZN3hwRYVXQL+iH6Nh1AbaaWi6C4w/9SwSMbXW X3VG7JwYiBdx69AeY1V7ZtGT0X6WiNkSUBd7lgVzGZPXLlF1xpenaN0qb9qRKos4TdJd wOVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lF/c/QaE4Ijf3OnRciQuRRIl9zETRzHfhdWSko6YQmw=; b=OcdicDvuXJgmRNO9rzhnsQ7Q8FBJ/PU+C1mHw9SoQ+VqBeAKdUhLyn7sCdXKcu0wdh ou8/1A/I1IY1ioV2lsC+DaS1wLo4fYZNaVyroVvs4Aegp1ZWSzc8eXILHzlmWwrEROc5 GgOIEcgvlsIJCBuMdyotBtEQ7ztajTvxIp8eqBbz5FfL5BNy//ToLUEBVqqCELATDXvY 8EfQpyoQ7XJ9v/psrKbg+Wvkt6xp5r3neH+Wp+g3AwjHBtUXSlw6PEBr5oA1G8nV31kh +5bLstBS9dYzeOmx3s9eyMia6jb1G7zADBnWVhWGEXGcWvOYVsGJZuKCcN7kdiBc/x0v ZNpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rBvTvRxTZhvq7+fitnybWJVmeY7+n/WlOCksA+CRHj0vGlO6J L7N7NbzFn4Bmx4L1jN7X9k9j7jIJfGQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9JA6D6LZ/63E4mr7QJzWF5HJfkeqO9+KSQ/hXKZZ91wLRI88zw3QQ6Xd8hVOUZdeo0Guwug== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2523:: with SMTP id gg3mr5296176qvb.56.1639803402532; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 20:56:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd ([207.35.95.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s4sm6441041qko.47.2021.12.17.20.56.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 20:56:42 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 23:56:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2021 12:32:10 -0500") Message-ID: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi! Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:33:39PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 >> +(define-public gnupg-next > > I noticed that this package variant omits the pinentry patch. In any > case, I'm testing a full upgrade of gnupg to 2.2.33 for the version-1.4.0 > branch. I'm testing this: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.3.3. * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg): Update to 2.3.3. (gnupg-2.2.32): Delete variable. (qgpgme)[native-inputs]: Use the regular gnupg package. 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) gnu/packages/gnupg.scm | 32 ++++---------------------------- modified gnu/packages/gnupg.scm @@ -279,15 +279,15 @@ (define-public npth (define-public gnupg (package (name "gnupg") - (version "2.2.30") + (version "2.3.3") (source (origin (method url-fetch) - (uri (string-append "mirror://gnupg/gnupg/gnupg-" version + (uri (string-append "ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-" version ".tar.bz2")) (patches (search-patches "gnupg-default-pinentry.patch")) (sha256 (base32 - "1111ry31gaxv76miqsy6l0kwxwlx8sz0jk41jhyrjwx649p6sqyc")))) + "0dz9x0r5021bhk1kjh29m1q13xbslwb8yn9qzcp7b9m1lrnvi2ap")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (native-inputs (list pkg-config)) @@ -347,25 +347,6 @@ (define-public gnupg (properties '((ftp-server . "ftp.gnupg.org") (ftp-directory . "/gcrypt/gnupg"))))) -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 - (package - (inherit gnupg) - (version "2.2.32") - - ;; Hide this version because packages like 'emacs-pinentry' propagate the - ;; default GnuPG and "guix install gnupg emacs-pinentry" would fail with a - ;; collision error. - (properties `((hidden? . #t) - ,@(package-properties gnupg))) - - (source (origin - (inherit (package-source gnupg)) - (uri (string-append "mirror://gnupg/gnupg/gnupg-" version - ".tar.bz2")) - (sha256 - (base32 - "0506gv54z10c96z5821z9p0ksibk1pfilsmag39ffqrcz0sinmxj")))))) - (define-public gnupg-1 (package (inherit gnupg) (version "1.4.23") @@ -437,14 +418,9 @@ (define-public qgpgme "lang/cpp/src/libgpgmepp.la") (symlink (string-append gpgme "/lib/libgpgme.la") "src/libgpgme.la")) - (chdir "lang/qt") - #t))))) + (chdir "lang/qt")))))) (native-inputs - ;; Use GnuPG 2.2.32. With 2.2.30, 'testSymmetricEncryptDecrypt' in - ;; t-encrypt.cpp fails because 'gpg' wrongfully ask for a passphrase do - ;; decrypt the cypher text. (modify-inputs (package-native-inputs gpgme) - (replace "gnupg" gnupg-2.2.32) (prepend pkg-config))) (inputs (modify-inputs (package-inputs gpgme) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Maxim From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52483.163987159112004 (code B ref 52483); Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2021 23:53:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myjVn-00037X-1O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:11 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:60743) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myjVl-00037L-Qv for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:10 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0476C32006F2; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=KhVJzW0jIP0UAdKc9uoAbODG ls6EdFpVTnRzH6Mz2nc=; b=dnUpU0EZMaG2JCi1l+w3ojm0NylEuVvnbfmXPvR0 xbuQz7g973T0y/nLpvxHdjr6pM7743Su3WQcJ3GrlJlapGKItoiIXaX2YSKGLcy7 NMAOSLR+QXjZDXd2c1VI/AiWUS/RSNbNeoIthLGzGifu0tISyirnI1aXyIeQgcuE +YI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=KhVJzW 0jIP0UAdKc9uoAbODGls6EdFpVTnRzH6Mz2nc=; b=jNI7m0F0Z/Q1v58kU/ELpb nG7NIxWQgWYS6tfpf/NeBSi5omzvrXvp/Ns8LIVQn8+et3Rqx7fYNM6K/H2fatny GgKf0TuwZB3n9WcWxheL5f+JEWTq0jQOH6u+Pdhl0Rz8OWEHkQvE4W8/YqDYcDXw guia0URy6HlR0QVe4tYGm5AVAV0gqvVwck48qZUIwo53ni529qBYjkx6JCZsVBrW yT29px7Q8qzZiRIBevVA1J/9punEeOirv81TAEYqPPPZOiotcJt9PlWlpE56VqVF B3RXg4gDaen/DzwwYYKbRIA1O7YhtSK5LsD2YQ0xl50dYh9C/0yBxSgjVUt68I4Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrleelgdduhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgr mhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheffvefg necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvoh esfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:01 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:56:41PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > I'm testing this: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.3.3. > > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg): Update to 2.3.3. > (gnupg-2.2.32): Delete variable. > (qgpgme)[native-inputs]: Use the regular gnupg package. Okay. Make sure to also adjust emacs-pinentry. I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG 2.2.32. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Resent-From: Michael Rohleder Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 01:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52483.163987757321283 (code B ref 52483); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 01:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 01:32:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44560 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myl4G-0005XC-RW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 20:32:53 -0500 Received: from wp224.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.231]:45102) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myl4F-0005X2-BD for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 20:32:51 -0500 Received: from www.rohleder.de ([37.61.204.227]); authenticated by wp224.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1myl4D-0005Xi-AZ; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 02:32:49 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (helo=micha) by www.rohleder.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1myl3t-0005Qq-So; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 02:32:48 +0100 From: Michael Rohleder References: Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 02:32:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:12 -0500") Message-ID: <875yrlbcqo.fsf@rohleder.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;mike@rohleder.de;1639877571;8a357c52; X-HE-SMSGID: 1myl4D-0005Xi-AZ X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari writes: > If emacs-pinentry cannot use a current GnuPG, what should we do? And > maybe we don't need emacs-pinentry anymore?: > > https://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/64721 > I don't think emacs-pinentry is needed, because adding "allow-emacs-pinentry" to gpg-agent.conf worked (for me) (at least) since several years in (guix) emacs w/o using emacs-pinentry (or other emacs customization). =2D-- Wir kommen nackt auf diese Welt und atmen ein. Wir atmen aus und verlassen diese Welt mit leeren H=C3=A4nden. und dazwischen gestalten wir unser Leben. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFFBAEBCAAvFiEEdV4t5dDVhcUueCgwfHr/vv7yyyUFAmG+i78RHG1pa2VAcm9o bGVkZXIuZGUACgkQfHr/vv7yyyXdegf7B2ghPt9jAkWEECnhsTx3hzkWV/ClDplb xWX7s7hMqFqf0yVw5ab3vNGoQg4fRaTUwflK/W/rfEFaZw6Sewa7uW/3M+EBD+lq uikXoeNOeaZCUedatBa0dOJy3/vOsHa0Up6KktiL+BvTDGrku8rJT3Bfs57tvOmS xYGLF+plXfWi9FwtVc9MhGRS36DnZDyA5v9pj9weA3JE3cCiE4RN6RQMTxECHkko ytxnyRgH/8OwV+beGyVtA0KoYLQNUdcnJxa3p4czpy3OEO0JhHDTT8JSi8UVzblU BJDhYIoxWVTB1bJBCSfydcmeSBWNnqTPioAZBixus09fROSh9DDNYg== =CqSh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52483.163994555121903 (code B ref 52483); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 20:25:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2kg-0005hD-Vo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:25:51 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f182.google.com ([209.85.160.182]:45856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2kf-0005gz-IH for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:25:49 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f182.google.com with SMTP id p19so7997663qtw.12 for <52483@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:25:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=L3pbpHrXM0lxzWcaAhpmyVFDYgPZm4kuHXomr6qMMsk=; b=QM+lcWTeNLxRKydSHQi6HWuMIpeQ6W3zp3AFJwOQsEaFw5byhs9dOCsgn00fgU0NVL puWpYiNjoh/ytmztBIdiV7bqedvWBJfhAIbDteJEDVwD3EuMSw+NWK7if7KcVo6ITw45 bj5EG/WieU1vD6XA+fDACcqWSjtFO72rOHH6G/0h4MK60FRm60Apt6FawKuvKvsN85Jz ICCI39WdHZ54RBh81RtANkA8vi+tQ/Exf4EL+OJOSt/8ogrXkbhaGjnc5NQUkOYpAk2U 64L7XdQ7IGx1HzsL7FP4YitCSKhlTYHpVrBMRyxu6R+tFnk/jRuPsr4EHb3pvG0WxQcg sXUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=L3pbpHrXM0lxzWcaAhpmyVFDYgPZm4kuHXomr6qMMsk=; b=kG8soRgmP+fYUM9Cw7mAJWOSEXWDw8zfcmwcbSJxGm2nQ98TV/xh3Z2kLb/eEhl+44 c6am7OG6Up8NCb9FVKxl9jQGV9ENClt25E9guMcrdvB/2I1jdTwtbPz/CdYqYKa1v45g 6tjKhbx307LIP3SfIwl4NJNuaTxAvHneiHz/Na+k+ns5iRQITfXzExqlEVry0Ac/jG1c f61FMvnuQCSpMaX+BnU8ZzRaUF4YsYWA8+b2vdjBew3UqLEjoga8z9ZDv81Gzpj3Q5ru L/SOTsTlevzQuxhufcwIush6ioDeYj8wvRTmMCWO5w8yAaH/miWjoE24PfhUbJPf+9Uu kOjA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533A9Bspc0xG69zLdccrx7+/cjJPQMyWcS6IOlM9OuyBxYzZZ15g 2NOrL0TZBi+TCjlZOXiOYaggVlGVWMc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9Wud0TReDh8pALnWbFBG55i5dSu7CeKgkoeqI0h440Y75NY7R4dx7SlTHV+rQW3eEJ0rfDA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:164e:: with SMTP id y14mr10122154qtj.651.1639945543995; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:25:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-133-19.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.133.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2sm13121689qta.11.2021.12.19.12.25.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:25:43 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:25:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:53:01 -0500") Message-ID: <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Leo, Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:56:41PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> I'm testing this: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.3.3. >> >> * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg): Update to 2.3.3. >> (gnupg-2.2.32): Delete variable. >> (qgpgme)[native-inputs]: Use the regular gnupg package. > > Okay. Make sure to also adjust emacs-pinentry. > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > 2.2.32. I ended up sticking with 2.2.33, since this is the current "LTS" release. Unfortunately it fails 3 new tests of python-gnupg, and its author think it is a regression in GnuPG itself [0]. [0] https://github.com/vsajip/python-gnupg/issues/163 We'll see what upstream has to say about it. Thank you, Maxim From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52483.163994600722724 (code B ref 52483); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:34:02 +0000 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 20:33:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48293 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2s3-0005uS-0W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:27 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:60459) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2s0-0005uE-PL for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:25 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B743200A64; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=Wf29vl2tHtggQ9DbprunWicg eOYeoEaWC9vk0vjhcNw=; b=jidguiwbVX6W3F+G5MbqrmrcL3Ir1AWN+VNqoCQz epAWwdNyFSc9+cFfJ7Z0jAHl9djPLKJSvxmWzcSAG1P0iwxM5KhWFajXvX4Lhvgl o+WKaBWv7MhnbANW+9cbKjlDK0IVFaujnfx2LEHnrKXevHne+mNJql63ZKKrpomx MXY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Wf29vl 2tHtggQ9DbprunWicgeOYeoEaWC9vk0vjhcNw=; b=nA+NiE2BuGeuVy2tPrIJGP 4MOph850Cx9iah24vm09IsNK7lf42PqxbQPHmaslPn1Kv5xXJYJdk7X6jki9h3Ef Dmmmbl7EYJgCDThXDIyrgCfJ1R93vD9ugVaBtcgpHEMdCszfpIkmG5l6YHx6doIL HfIfK8dla18B+ex0HdVhxFH8i1ZK6vyyJNBskn+rPYmg54tcYSV/KH+dmaf/FGq+ IerYL5rLMWS4Bvx2nzs7+Tny+S06QM7KBiaBLOn+98kBfT1ejfONFvEi1HJ2j9L4 FutFtNxB1D0fy0l9d3e2u8zu+rs7WXecknOqO372MX6lakBs5ulJLp9pPBVgdudA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddttddgudegtdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhephefgleevhfdttdefheeitdfgheffffffledvlefhgfektdethefguefgheeg tefhnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:33:16 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > I ended up sticking with 2.2.33, since this is the current "LTS" > release. Unfortunately it fails 3 new tests of python-gnupg, and its > author think it is a regression in GnuPG itself [0]. > > [0] https://github.com/vsajip/python-gnupg/issues/163 Right, this is why I used 2.2.32. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52483.163994619623046 (code B ref 52483); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 20:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 20:36:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2v6-0005zd-0K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:36 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:32799) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz2v4-0005zQ-3x for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:34 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE3432009BD; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=3fgZhrRh74ceoJPE/SisiCfu LUe/D0pg5scxzwWQQRg=; b=nhyPGYGQ+FdLE18Jdc+JQ2Aeo2M8iQdke6C0qnd4 GUNo5I1DN6tiFgv88nzPw834MY7yxuG44AX2H/2YuHyJItqAm5o0kQ1FYQ53ndsY MyjXB3SPyCD8bBthmAZ95BdHXuAC8gJAAtc6mQjmoTlMlzv1aJAkQLvbNF+v2BSD /RA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=3fgZhr Rh74ceoJPE/SisiCfuLUe/D0pg5scxzwWQQRg=; b=emahvDgeMLCgPYjnuwW46B 8dAgx4gu9VUf85IMKBLuTDZRYgx+z50WDHEAzcMyD9ewV8xLZM69e8g+2mkeBOoJ j0Irpze0AcbdLKDoMxkIJr6H8rK7/PjykwSyICX4flgQym4n+V6xSAjI3OEFtC3P RZzHu2lCtFPZqkoyDHvByijT1knluW+N/MZxWMDtWMkxFCAnaHZ4C3Segybv30fK Ap7Q5R4q5B8KQ4NNlf+dfHtLCzqXZfCtAT8EwGHhpkUtm8OuY4YQSUh/EwSC2w7c i3lk5LnpxY4INBpruRKAh+UvCxpEt/xIvrQtRPqJ4W6A990eI+rqvM6NjZEk5fFA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddttddgudegudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheff vefgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplh gvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:25 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > > 2.2.32. I see that my message was confusing, with mixed up version numbers. There's no regressions on x86_64 with 2.2.32. Since it fixes this bug, I'd like to make it available soon. Maybe we can unhide the gnupg-2.2.32 variable, and remove emacs-pinentry, since everyone is saying that it's no longer useful. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52483 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 52483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52483.16402176842702 (code B ref 52483); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 52483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2021 00:01:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60045 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0BXv-0000hW-Qw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:24 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:48559) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0BXu-0000hH-Ce for 52483@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:22 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF685C016A; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=Cb1Sspz9MQsg+95otJu6hhkI +2oDj82QItcnZJYBPW4=; b=JqVSrQNLMrGlAIJ6IzpGO4qoOvWZN6b8h+YF2Wuw fjHLxfwLOnBg55bLWSNv/ncR0MKpKFaPOHTMkVlBGamDtvxCR1zcq5seuFZcTED1 6sMMPTC1zytaKfPiRklCqz6eHhF8qMqhpA1uPvgO1FXdi1qL/24fTsdBFTrZsk1i aMM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Cb1Ssp z9MQsg+95otJu6hhkI+2oDj82QItcnZJYBPW4=; b=a2gurMF1qIKMiUn1kpcdXh frCbC2+4ALL75SWa3/0/CbO84TucnYs0znWwVWa2SWWtYwDO9flVngCQ7A82BC5D fFdw9/eQ4S1FmuaGKlXK6gG0mjGX6Xyjls5xHWytOZLkewleoKrBYppCZoMOTvTe y0Y/U0UcN381I68Sb5hsRcmzaRbyI1QSJsNAg3N13s0iSbNOsC0jib24xGt8ES2Q X3kToZkC5B0aqcMTHaDlXkC/Jxbs5NC/IF9iWkF2rlCaE/4DGcCa1jdqKx+D0u6n iQ2lrNGBYEQeLhxABbWg9nb7yEF1KHyAFdUuuUbJlYeFkzx3JS5gjvHhrCqnWBbg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddtjedgudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhffgkeeikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudff ieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:01:15 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:36:25PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > > > 2.2.32. > > I see that my message was confusing, with mixed up version numbers. > There's no regressions on x86_64 with 2.2.32. Since it fixes this bug, > I'd like to make it available soon. Maybe we can unhide the gnupg-2.2.32 > variable, and remove emacs-pinentry, since everyone is saying that it's > no longer useful. Here are patches for this: From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:35:45 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#52483: closed (Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption) Message-ID: References: X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 52483 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 52483@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 22:47:01 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1640558821-13117-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1640558821-13117-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 52483@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 52483: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D52483 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1640558821-13117-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 52483-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2021 22:46:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n1cHy-0003P5-Nx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:50 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:44907) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n1cHx-0003Op-75 for 52483-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:49 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C0D3200A16; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=J7M0osnYs3osl/GHfl79nXnY Py7xq8TPFrm+7wYficQ=; b=WExc3xzEA2z0Fm45+ABGPBQ9g9k0C00OiS/slmfe ZbvOtf8vvg6okEo/A9U9hlaTIPpai5Hf0WjhU25VbZPWlFLy9qROZuwrEj2Ss/SY X1WR7U8NMvScIpPl2Rbo+pW142UdyGJvidVD2OU+of/QolVfrv3f06vaxnszuQaw HOU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=J7M0os nYs3osl/GHfl79nXnYPy7xq8TPFrm+7wYficQ=; b=OC56CXTAxH/U6mKDSGAxHN G9XdPivmfC4BuLgp5JVzvK2w9kCo4TJiHv62IyIt+R9H7LvRWU3Or9wP8wpu9e6E VhocyUxDpxOpBWsBcoX87uvBb0SAMClKeOhXvD1gcCc+w7pXgnG7LlyLUVqkld7d uhoGel+FfL0JFkJSL2fFB8fu60/hNNDGpkW1i84cyV9knT42gKYNLjjmW95SffT0 K0hUFgy/eCEL0wSk3K0exWLmS3UbHlrd9FiAflQ2Tjhl7o0n1MwOP7aVcaJ+CyWT SmNAUfx6MCkxSUZER/ygAoDwSJeq/07t6M331ttEFokOWz3GiLJQYv9rQwNZrmGA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddugedgjeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhfeufeeivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffev gfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvg hosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:46:41 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: bug#52483: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: References: <87mtky4ik6.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <874k744a0p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 52483-done Cc: 52483-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:36:25PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > > I tested with GnuPG 2.2.23 by building all packages that depend directly > > > on GnuPG. There were no new failures on x86_64-linux when using GnuPG > > > 2.2.32. > > I see that my message was confusing, with mixed up version numbers. > There's no regressions on x86_64 with 2.2.32. Since it fixes this bug, > I'd like to make it available soon. Maybe we can unhide the gnupg-2.2.32 > variable, and remove emacs-pinentry, since everyone is saying that it's > no longer useful. I pushed commit d03aa942d, which makes GnuPG 2.2.32 available in the UI. I didn't remove emacs-pinentry... that's something that Emacs users should decide how to handle. ------------=_1640558821-13117-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 16:46:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59377 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwd-0007VZ-N2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:31 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwX-0007V5-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwV-0004QN-SP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:21 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:54717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxAwT-0007iZ-VW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:19 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAF15C00DD; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= mesmtp; bh=NyHxbjxOLxgwKoy2gzyrfG+iRFMtDAcx9mSvgAzepI4=; b=AJEPg V5av0V5BZhmSxfwG0GEJz9sEZPkypuLm4QlMApFYvOv2MI7ya9vmty73iPJBCdfW aT6qpXbf/lS5GrlHjzyfcEGG2prEJCm26fOJAOttQe44PzFRyLi1zR6GAAO4Syw5 z7wV9PcMYf9PpStWZ0Sjlpp8s82irCxFE7Ru3Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=NyHxbjxOLxgwKoy2gzyrfG+iRFMtD Acx9mSvgAzepI4=; b=Yy/fjCItA9LCgnGrYh1rM6G+eB58VaLkbbi3fx4tbnmhs oXLvbMUcbSBi+1Ts4OzdogZgWGkACVQ4p97Y02hsV8l8CWjeGWScEqQXYtXX4H98 Ob/vnwsc/L9Kmj4ZSofITFRvULhcP9BOgkBkeNtevlecrqgkSfPo9Zm46OoRLHbL 2P5k5J3AkS55TUHNuLYmn7h6PaUPjNTZMd1Q/M0Ht99gq/x2a4KyNSKe5xr67ApZ OOvpFQcyX1zlmGalz/++h2A8rmn9MB4d6h/X7h7dnmKRB2yFah7Xxw/S17L0y4LY kVZavCFI6KRow2rXoQ8lMTl/BWuk3slE07qfU7rgQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledtgdelvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggusehgtderredttd dvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdr nhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefhteeuffffveduheejfeeggeelffdvffdvhe dvleffledtkedvleduudekfefgudenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhhpghdrohhrghdpghhn uhdrohhrghdpshhtrggtkhgvgigthhgrnhhgvgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgr mhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:46:12 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: GnuPG 2.2.30 cannot do symmetric encryption Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6Xc3uR5LPmFETree" Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) --6Xc3uR5LPmFETree Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gJGG8P8sag/4cacj" Content-Disposition: inline --gJGG8P8sag/4cacj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Our GnuPG package is version 2.2.30, which includes this bug: https://dev.gnupg.org/T5577 The effect of this bug is that symmetric encryption / decryption does not work. The bug was fixed in 2.2.31 and 2.3.3. Changing GnuPG will cause 2406 rebuilds. I think that's suboptimal but it's the situation. There is a gnupg-2.2.32 package, but it's hidden because it would break emacs-pinentry: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm?id=861ee6d908fefc47d765f81e33cdf6f84b6d50eb#n350 Here is a patch that unhides gnupg-2.2.32, updates it to 2.2.33, and makes emacs-pinentry use that package variant. If emacs-pinentry cannot use a current GnuPG, what should we do? And maybe we don't need emacs-pinentry anymore?: https://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/64721 --gJGG8P8sag/4cacj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-gnu-GnuPG-Update-gnupg-2.2.32-to-2.2.33.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom b80a537cb9529b2f186519684901fe2be9e0a0f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 =46rom: Leo Famulari Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:40:28 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: GnuPG: Update gnupg-2.2.32 to 2.2.33. * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg-2.2.32): Replace with ... (gnupg-2.2.33): ... new variable. * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-pinentry)[propagated-inputs]: Use gnupg-2.2.33. --- gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 2 +- gnu/packages/gnupg.scm | 13 +++---------- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm index 32915fb6ed..5ce07645ce 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm @@ -21238,7 +21238,7 @@ (define-public emacs-pinentry "1lf30q6r8nz5cjzclbb9bbymsk2y75nskvb55hnjdv93gr3j0sik")))) (build-system emacs-build-system) (propagated-inputs - (list gnupg)) + (list gnupg-2.2.33)) (home-page "https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/pinentry.html") (synopsis "GnuPG Pinentry server implementation") (description diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm b/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm index 665e9e3021..fc7c1fbee0 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gnupg.scm @@ -347,24 +347,17 @@ (define-public gnupg (properties '((ftp-server . "ftp.gnupg.org") (ftp-directory . "/gcrypt/gnupg"))))) =20 -(define-public gnupg-2.2.32 +(define-public gnupg-2.2.33 (package (inherit gnupg) - (version "2.2.32") - - ;; Hide this version because packages like 'emacs-pinentry' propagate = the - ;; default GnuPG and "guix install gnupg emacs-pinentry" would fail wi= th a - ;; collision error. - (properties `((hidden? . #t) - ,@(package-properties gnupg))) - + (version "2.2.33") (source (origin (inherit (package-source gnupg)) (uri (string-append "mirror://gnupg/gnupg/gnupg-" version ".tar.bz2")) (sha256 (base32 - "0506gv54z10c96z5821z9p0ksibk1pfilsmag39ffqrcz0sinmxj"))))= )) + "1qz403080hwba8j8vpnfkvh7clg1dbg74kdn1d0p0g84iip87246"))))= )) =20 (define-public gnupg-1 (package (inherit gnupg) --=20 2.34.0 --gJGG8P8sag/4cacj-- --6Xc3uR5LPmFETree Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAmG4ylEACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgIoA/8CrX2kBUogCw4iu9Oq38/YcUeCLFv7SHyoZ9UqtmuDxTMini6sg4j4GcV Fx0NdYdHuhYvrJHmNus+0jqIHa1+BJ5YzEsGKwYldEY458FeQCYVh2fJqhzu0mMi MVBTa7ciHN5SpC8Bu73G2WRnUkJM7m8AoiOJP8KJjUZ1TCD2DHUdAAh6yrfuH3+0 cbYB52y/ld2KTkn/JkhmmSrh3xMjWweahIKQCaSYzleN/sLTw2CkMi8OZJB/4ERX BQXFGQ9wNTUD5cxHDK3sqvYa9FQs00Gu7gelsTGzvWphhWq+cCOBuDzeNxwdIyDT 0E5f0uwpDzgnqQQEPlNrtOhF5nAYkBZKiAQAGOf+aPRUPpXPk+OHXV5ImSiIoW6x BP5gZZDqswO0AgBoUipKtaklC9HZFH2vZD1qTfr5Ak+5DjZM1oaGML7QWQYY6bur 34GeM0OfHHrnZQSKKxMU9id3beLjjk/dlG8qLJBFXBNo21YeXdvgDLZaB9MY2Lek qfVzdTk8OfzrR4MrO8STsCuYy+xKTEi23fkXw/cE/HrQO4MS3u4ADYEBQzjFcgc8 82uRn9r0wN7tesCC4sywlvTjCtfOOUMdHgeLNTgLZLF09dUCXRi96gF4yDHj5/QF EmU61mw0Ru8JiDOisahx4i5sRZ0M1e491d+z4bkbrAcfZ9kaRQs= =rqWB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6Xc3uR5LPmFETree-- ------------=_1640558821-13117-1--