Subject: Re: bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:17:58 +0100

Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]> writes:

>> One could expect something else still: a new buffer in the current
>> default-directory. Meaning, an [e]shell buffer that corresponds (in
>> some way) to
>> the buffer that was previously displayed in that window.

Yes, but...  having a single buffer for things is what we usually do --
*info*, *Help*, etc.

> Isn't that what the prefix argument is for?

Yup.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no