GNU bug report logs - #52448
key-valid-p vs "C-M-x" and "ESC C-x"

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 52448 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 52448 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#52448: key-valid-p vs "C-M-x" and "ESC C-x"
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 05:33:10 -0800

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
>
>> AFAIU, we want exactly one valid way to write keybindings with
>> `key-valid-p'.  Should both of these be `key-valid-p'?
>>
>> 1.  (key-description (kbd "ESC C-x"))
>>     => "C-M-x"
>>
>>     (key-valid-p "ESC C-x")
>>     => t
>
> That's what happens today, but Stefan M had a cunning plan to make
> round-tripping these keystrokes (EST/TAB/RET) work better.
>
> In that case
>
> "ESC C-x"
>
> and
>
> "C-M-x"
>
> would still both be valid, but refer to different things (that get
> resolved to the same thing).

So both will be valid even with the planned changes, and this is
notabug?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.