GNU bug report logs - #52428
28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#52428: closed (28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is
 unbound on MS-DOS)
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 07:52:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2021 15:51:43 +0800
with message-id <87ilvuz2eo.fsf <at> yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: bug#52428: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #52428,
regarding 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
52428: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52428
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 18:53:15 +0800

On MS-DOS, start eshell, and type any command that will result in a
synchronous subprocess being started:

c:/djgpp/bin $ djecho hello

Eshell will complain that `processp' is unbound, because there are two
uses of `processp' in `eshell-eval-command' that need to be replaced
with `eshell-processp'.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 52428-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#52428: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound
 on MS-DOS
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 15:51:43 +0800

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
>> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:06:35 +0800
>> 
>> > c:/djgpp/bin $ djecho hello
>> >
>> > Eshell will complain that `processp' is unbound, because there are two
>> > uses of `processp' in `eshell-eval-command' that need to be replaced
>> > with `eshell-processp'.
>> 
>> If nobody minds, I'll fix this on the release branch by replacing those
>> calls with `eshell-processp'.
>> 
>> Eli, is that okay?
>
> Yes, of course.  Eshell should never directly call 'processp', except
> perhaps in code that makes no sense and isn't called on MS-DOS.

Done, and I'm closing this bug.  Thanks!

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.