Subject: Re: bug#52383: 29.0.50; [suggestion] Add seq-set-subset-p to seq.el

From: Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 02:19:46 +0100

Juri Linkov <[email-masked]> writes:

> There are already some commands in seq that look like set commands:
> seq-union, seq-intersection, seq-difference.

Yes, but that's unfortunate, and we need to stop at some point.  These
functions also don't really fit in seq.el.

Michael.