Subject: bug#52383: 29.0.50; [suggestion] Add seq-set-subset-p to seq.el

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:01:11 +0100

Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]> writes:

> If I recall correctly, Stefan wanted a set.el library.  I only want to
> mention that, because... well, it's related (and we already found that
> "subsequence" testing is not what this implements).

Yes, I'd rather have a set.el than adding some set commands to seq.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no