GNU bug report logs -
#5235
23.1; Unibyte keyboard input problem
Previous Next
Full log
Message #59 received at 5235 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>So does this mean using latin-2 solves your original problem as well?
>That is, are you able to edit the source files without the annoying
>questions from Emacs when you save the files?
No, latin-2 does not solve my problem:) I do not want to read/write file in
latin-2 but cp1250!
But yes, when saving in latin-2 then there is no problem (I mean, no annoying
question) which exists when saving with cp1250. I understand that's
because "convertion tables" are different for these both codepages and e.g.
\210 code is differently converted.
Once again, I want to load my file with cp1250, edit it (writing polish chars
and see them properly on screen) and save buffer with cp1250. (Of course all
the strange chars which comes from cp852 should be unchanged.) When I load
file with cp1250 and then save this buffer with latin-2 then all the polish
chars that were originally in cp1250 will be now in latin-2 and this is not
what I want.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 300 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.