GNU bug report logs - #52286
28.0.90; [PATCH] Be consistent in naming of separators in context menu

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 21:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch, wontfix

Found in version 28.0.90

Fixed in version 29.0.50

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 52286 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#52286: 28.0.90; [PATCH] Be consistent in naming of separators in context menu
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2021 12:39:37 +0200
> Cc: 52286 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 23:44:07 -0800
> 
> > The first pretest of Emacs 28 is already out, so this problem is
> > already with us, isn't it?
> 
> If it's too late to change this, that's ok. I just noticed it while 
> working on the patch for bug#52237 and figured it'd be good to file a 
> bug about it while there's still a non-zero chance it could be changed. 
> It's a pretty minor issue, so I don't really mind if this gets closed as 
> wontfix.
> 
> If this change *is* ok to merge, I'll happily update the ELisp manual 
> with a brief summary of the convention before it gets merged.

I'd like to hear opinions of others.  Meanwhile, having the proposed
convention spelled out in the manual would be good to make sure we are
all on the same page regarding the issue.

As for the issue itself: cannot we detect the separators in some more
robust way, one that doesn't depend on how they are named?  And if
that's not feasible, perhaps allow anything that has "separator" in
its name to be considered a separator?

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 181 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.