GNU bug report logs - #52246
[PATCH] [core-updates-frozen] Build evolution with libsoup 2

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#52246: closed ([PATCH] [core-updates-frozen] Build evolution
 with libsoup 2)
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2021 09:19:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2021 10:18:41 +0100
with message-id <871r2r1kb2.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#52246: [PATCH] [core-updates-frozen] Build evolution with libsoup 2
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #52246,
regarding [PATCH] [core-updates-frozen] Build evolution with libsoup 2
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
52246: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52246
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] [core-updates-frozen] Build evolution with libsoup 2
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 16:45:10 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear guix,

Maxim Cournoyer upgraded evolution in
acd827be09a5d15734be9a09a88e1892d54f8dc4, but used webkitgtk with
libsoup 3, which conflicts with libsoup 2 as used by
evolution-data-server.

I propose that we use the libsoup 2 variant everywhere, what do you
think?

Best regards,

Vivien

[0001-gnu-evolution-Build-with-libsoup-2.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
To: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
Cc: 52246-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#52246: [PATCH] [core-updates-frozen] Build evolution with
 libsoup 2
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2021 10:18:41 +0100

Hey,

> I propose that we use the libsoup 2 variant everywhere, what do you
> think?

Seems fair, pushed as f8490817e70c78502ba7bcb9aa98164d0e72b66c.

Thanks,

Mathieu

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.