GNU bug report logs -
#52240
29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6
Previous Next
Reported by: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 10:14:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 29.0.50
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
>> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:29:00 +0100
>> Cc: 52240 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
>>
>> > What about what it's actually complaining about, then? I.e.,
>> >
>> > (insert ?\N{left-to-right embedding})
>>
>> Sorry, I thought I had tried that already but didn't look carefully at
>> the result. When I do 'C-u C-x =' at the insertion, I get:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> position: 308 of 308 (100%), column: 37
>> character: (displayed as ) (codepoint 8234, #o20052, #x202a)
>> charset: unicode (Unicode (ISO10646))
>> code point in charset: 0x202A
>> script: symbol
>> syntax: w which means: word
>> category: L:Strong L2R
>> to input: type "C-x 8 RET 202a" or "C-x 8 RET LEFT-TO-RIGHT EMBEDDING"
>> buffer code: #xE2 #x80 #xAA
>> file code: #xE2 #x80 #xAA (encoded by coding system utf-8-dos)
>> display: by this font (glyph code):
>> harfbuzz:-outline-Symbola-regular-normal-normal-serif-12-*-*-*-p-*-iso10646-1 (#x875)
>>
>> Character code properties: customize what to show
>> name: LEFT-TO-RIGHT EMBEDDING
>> general-category: Cf (Other, Format)
>> decomposition: (8234) ('')
>
> Which is correct, right? or did you spot something problematic?
This is correct. So I eval'ed (C-x C-e) the example and the entries
in `glyphless--bidi-control-characters' :
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
?\N{latin small letter a with grave}
224 (#o340, #xe0)
?\N{right-to-left embedding}
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable embedding})
elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil)
eval-last-sexp(nil)
funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil)
command-execute(eval-last-sexp)
?\N{left-to-right override}
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable override})
elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil)
eval-last-sexp(nil)
funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil)
command-execute(eval-last-sexp)
?\N{right-to-left override}
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable override})
elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil)
eval-last-sexp(nil)
funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil)
command-execute(eval-last-sexp)
?\N{left-to-right isolate}
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable isolate})
elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil)
eval-last-sexp(nil)
funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil)
command-execute(eval-last-sexp)
?\N{right-to-left isolate}
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable isolate})
elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil)
eval-last-sexp(nil)
funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil)
command-execute(eval-last-sexp)
?\N{first strong isolate}
8296 (#o20150, #x2068)
?\N{pop directional formatting}
8236 (#o20054, #x202c)
?\N{pop directional isolate}
8297 (#o20151, #x2069)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
It seems to me that something goes wrong when the unicode name contains
a hyphen? As a random example,
?\N{LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK}
also complains about (void-variable MARK}).
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 172 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.